Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mindspillage

I see the job of the Committee as to sort out problems that have gotten so bad that no one else can deal with them, and that are wasting the time of editors who are here to write, and to seek the ideal solution: the one that ends up with the least damage and lets the people who are here to work cooperatively and productively on articles do just that.

I believe strongly in keeping a civil and productive atmosphere on Wikipedia, and not being overly bound by precedent in search of a proper outcome. I also believe in using no firmer a touch than is necessary to remedy a problem.

There are certain issues I am firm on, including civility and respect as well as the proper use of admin powers. I also am a strong supporter of ignoring all rules, which makes me all the more disturbed when that guideline is abused for ends it wasn't meant for.

As a temporary appointee I believe most of my time on the AC so far has been spent "learning the ropes", and have found I would rather write articles than serve on the AC; what sane person wouldn't? But it hasn't made me want to snap yet, either, so I will fill the post if I am wanted back. Questions welcomed.

Questions

Support

  1. Phroziac . o º O ( ♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 00:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Zach (Smack Back) Fair use policy 00:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. M A Mason 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Support. David | explanation | Talk 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Friday (talk) 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Voice of All T| @| ESP 00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. -- a.n.o.n.y.m t 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Michael Snow 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Support -- Doc ask? 00:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Shanes 00:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  11. Antandrus (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  12. Support. - Seth Ilys 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  13. Support. See my voting rationale. Talrias ( t | e | c) 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  14. – ugen64 00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  15. -- Sean| Bla ck 00:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  16. Jtkiefer T | C | @ ---- 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  17. Support. One of the best. Ambi 00:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  18. The Land 00:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  19. Support. – Quadell ( talk) ( bounties) 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  20. — Kirill Lok s hin 00:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  21. Cryptic (talk) 00:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  22. Support -- PRueda29 / Ptalk29 / Pcontribs29 00:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  23. Strongest support. She is intelligent, kind, extremely helpful, and has excellent judgement. -- NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 00:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  24. Support. -- GraemeL (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  25. Support — Omegatron 00:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  26. Support - Sango 123 (talk) 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  27. brenneman (t) (c) 00:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  28. Speedy Support -- Jaranda wat's sup 00:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  29. Dmcdevit· t 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  30. Nunh-huh 00:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  31. Support ➥the Epopt 00:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  32. Support. User:Zoe| (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  33. Support. — David Levy 01:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  34. Support. -- Dragonfiend 01:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  35. Support. An outstanding editor and arbitor, long may she continue. Batmanand 01:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  36. Support. — Ruud 01:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  37. Strong support. Carbonite | Talk 01:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  38. Support– Gnomz 007( ?) 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  39. Tony Sidaway| Talk 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  40. Support. -- Миборовский U| T| C| M| E| Chugoku Banzai! 01:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  41. Support - Mark 01:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  42. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 01:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  43. Support - EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  44. Support, a good editor who has done a fairly good job. JYolkowski // talk 01:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  45. Support - Mackensen (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  46. Support. -- Golbez 01:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  47. Support -- Angelo 01:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  48. Support - no question.- gadfium 01:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  49. Support-- Duk 01:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  50. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 02:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  51. Support -- one of the finest. -- Wgfinley 02:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  52. Support Bjelleklang - talk 02:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  53. Why the hell not? Johnleemk | Talk 02:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  54. Support Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  55. Support — Bunchofgrapes ( talk) 02:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Strong Support Let's just clone 15-20 Mindspillages and end this election now. karmafist 02:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  56. Support Anytime, "Kat" is one of the most honest persons I know in Wiki. What I like about her is that she is fair in her judgement and if your wrong she will not hesitate to tell you even if you have a friendly relationship with her (I know from experience). Tony the Marine 02:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  57. Borderline support. Tries to be fair at least. Grace Note 02:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  58. Prompt resolutions and excellent communications!!! A+++++++++++++++ — 0918 BRIAN • 2006-01-9 02:54
  59. Support KillerChihuahua ?!? 02:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  60. -- ⟳ausa کui × 02:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  61. Support. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 03:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  62. King of All the Franks 03:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  63. Bigtime Support. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 03:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  64. Support - Banyan Tree 03:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  65. Support-- ragesoss 03:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  66. Support Fred Bauder 03:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  67. Support Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 03:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  68. Support- Very level headed, has been an excellent ArbCom member. Paul August ☎ 03:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  69. Support. Indeed. kmccoy (talk) 03:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  70. Support —the preceding unsigned comment is by GregAsche ( talk •  contribs) 03:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  71. Support One of the best choices we've got by far. -- InShaneee 04:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  72. Support. -- Viriditas 04:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  73. Support 172 04:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  74. Support. Thought she already was one. ;-) Jonathunder 04:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  75. Support. Rhobite 04:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  76. Strongly. — Dan | talk 04:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  77. Support Dottore So 04:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  78. Support. Past containment. -- MarkSweep  (call me collect) 04:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  79. — Charles P.  (Mirv) 04:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  80. uh-huh Grutness... wha? 04:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  81. Support -- Crunch 04:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  82. Bobet 04:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  83. Support. -- maru (talk) Contribs 05:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  84. Support. -- Aaron 05:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  85. Support incumbent with laudable record. HGB 05:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  86. Support -- Hurricane111 05:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  87. Support Dysprosia 05:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  88. Support, very good answers and good work on ArbCom. feydey 05:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  89. Support Good work so far in the role of arbitrator. Hamster Sandwich 05:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  90. Support -- Saikiri Remixed? 05:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  91. Support. Calm, rational user. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 05:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  92. Support. — Cleared as filed. 05:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  93. Support – Clockwork Soul 05:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  94. Support. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  95. Support -- Tabor 05:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  96. Support-- cj | talk 05:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  97. Support. android 79 06:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  98. Support. · Katefan0 (scribble)/ mrp 06:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  99. Support Trust implicitly, both character and judgement.-- Tznkai 06:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  100. Rob Church Talk 06:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  101. Support. — Catherine\ talk 06:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  102. Support. -- Angr ( tɔk) 06:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  103. Support. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  104. Support. Isomorphic 07:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  105. Support. Elle vécut heureusement toujours dorénavant ( Be eudaimonic!) 07:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  106. Pileon Support, we don't agree on everything, but I feel this user is fair — Locke Cole • t • c 07:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  107. Support. - Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 07:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  108. Support Best overall candidate-- MONGO 07:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  109. Support Charles Stewart 07:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  110. Support. utcursch | talk 07:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  111. Support, proven record as arbitrator. -- MPerel ( talk | contrib) 08:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  112. Support. Nandesuka 08:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  113. Support Sarah Ewart 08:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  114. Support -- Rama 09:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  115. Support Solid arbitrator. -- SCZenz 09:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  116. Support - Physchim62 (talk) 09:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  117. Support. -- Kefalonia 09:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  118. Support. -- MJ( ☎| @| C) 10:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC). reply
  119. Support, in part, for ideal stance on IAR.  —  Saxifrage |  ☎ 10:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  120. Support'. -- Missmarple 10:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  121. Support Geogre 11:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  122. Raven4x4x 11:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  123. Support. -- Woohookitty (cat scratches) 11:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  124. Support. 'I also am a strong supporter of ignoring all rules, which makes me all the more disturbed when that guideline is abused for ends it wasn't meant for' -- Amen. -- Nick Boalch ?!? 11:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  125. Support. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  126. support: Ombudsman 11:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  127. Support. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs Germany 11:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  128. Strongly support intelligent supporters of IAR. — Nightstallion (?) 12:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  129. Support Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  130. Support this user GETS what WP:IAR is about.   ALKIVAR ™ 13:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  131. Support - Mindspillage is reasonable, level-headed, and possessed of sound judgement. Ξxtreme Unction| yakkity yak 13:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  132. Suppport -- Michael Slone ( talk) 13:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  133. Support Mindspillage's not evil.  Grue  13:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  134. Troppus noelip emertxe. R adiant _>|< 13:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  135. Support. Friendly and reasonable.-- Eloquence * 14:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  136. Support. — BrianSmithson 14:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  137. Support. Thought she already was one... oh wait... the wub "?!" RFR - a good idea? 15:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  138. Support. -- Alabamaboy 15:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  139. Support The Literate Engineer 15:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  140. Support. Cberlet 16:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  141. Support -- kingboyk 16:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  142. Support. Keep it up.— Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 16:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  143. Support -- Ferkelparade π 17:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  144. Support Demi T/ C 18:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  145. Support Rhion 18:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  146. Support per IRC cabal ... errr ... I mean, There is no Cabal. -- Cyde Weys vote talk 18:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  147. Support -- Ixfd64 19:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  148. Support Garion96 (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  149. Haukur 19:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  150. Support. BD2412 T 19:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  151. Support. — Quarl ( talk) 2006-01-09 20:37 Z
  152. Support -- pgk( talk) 20:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  153. Support: -- It's-is-not-a-genitive 21:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  154. Support. Gamaliel 21:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  155. -- jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 21:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  156. Support Theo (Talk) 22:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  157. Support Naturenet | Talk 22:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  158. Support -- EMS | Talk 22:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  159. Support. siafu 22:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  160. Support Excellent stuff so far. — Matthew Brown ( T: C) 22:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  161. Splash talk 23:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  162. Support due to behavior in the past, and Everyking's oppose. Avriette 23:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  163. Support good job so far, and seems to have the right attitude for the job. CarbonCopy (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  164. Support Rangek 23:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  165. "Support' Smmurphy( Talk) 23:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  166. Support. Wally 00:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  167. Reluctant support; reluctant for no other reason than that it might take him away from editing articles. One of the Wikipedians I respect most. Matt Yeager 00:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  168. Support. Bishonen | talk 00:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC). reply
  169. Support. Remarkably sane, and definitely "new blood". Her position on the "riots" isn't the best, but makes enough sense. Oh and Matt, Mindspillage is a she :-P ~~ N ( t/ c) 00:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  170. Strongly support; cool headed, intelligent collaborator. Antonio Not Throwing the Towel Myself Martin 01:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  171. support BL kiss the lizard 01:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  172. Support. Mindspillage seems to be someone who continues to treat others with respect after she is given more power. What higher compliment could I pay? AnnH (talk) 01:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  173. Support. trustworthy, fine job so far.-- cjllw | TALK 01:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  174. older≠ wiser 02:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  175. Support. Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  176. Support. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 03:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  177. Support Maltmomma (chat) 03:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  178. support -- Irpen 03:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  179. Support Dlyons493 Talk 03:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  180. Support Olorin28 03:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  181. Support - please note that user shows obvious evidence of insanity by seeking re-election, however. :) - Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 05:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  182. Support Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  183. Support Good contributor — Sebastian (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  184. Support. silsor 05:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  185. Support – Abe Dashiell ( t/ c) 06:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  186. Support. JeremyA 06:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  187. Support. -- Fire Star 07:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  188. Support. -- Curps 08:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  189. Support Willmcw/ user:Will Beback/10:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  190. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 12:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  191. Support. Wikipedia needs more common sense. Kosebamse 13:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  192. Support. I have had nothing but positive experiences with her, and she has done a good job since joining the ArbCom. Rje 18:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  193. Support howch e ng { chat} 18:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  194. Support. No explanation necessary. Ral315 (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  195. Support, can identify dicks on wikipedia that need circumcision. Something we lacked efficency on the last arbcom team when I had a hearing. I wasnt too satisfied with that one. I am not criticising all past arbcomers, just perhaps a spesific one who knows who he/she is. -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 20:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  196. Support Damn straigt! Oskar 20:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  197. Support. Seems to be doing a good job. -- G Rutter 20:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  198. Support. I highly value the inclusive view of the ArbComm task. JFW |  T@lk 21:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support Hipocrite - «Talk» 22:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Hipocrite - «Talk» 22:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  199. Support Surprisingly, the vote fraud detected directly above would not have changed anything. Hipocrite - «Talk» 23:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  200. Support. Well-respected user. - SocratesJedi | Talk 23:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  201. Support. HollyAm 01:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  202. Support (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 01:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  203. Support Vsmith 02:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  204. Support. — David Wahler (talk) 02:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  205. Support. enochlau ( talk) 05:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  206. Support. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  207. Support Sunray 08:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  208. Support: delayed as I was verifying her from her photo identity card. -- Bhadani 10:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  209. Support-- R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 11:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  210. Support -- Terence Ong Talk 13:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  211. Support. Andre ( talk) 14:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  212. Support Cormaggio @ 18:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  213. - Vote Signed By: Chazz- Place comments here
  214. Support KTC 20:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  215. Support-- A Y Arktos 21:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  216. Support, appointed ArbCom member. — Ian Manka Questions? Talk to me! 22:06, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support All in 22:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  217. Support DreamGuy 01:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  218. Support Sharpdust 02:40, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  219. Support -- Carnildo 05:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  220. Support At last, a sensible candidature!!! Sjc 05:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  221. Support pfctdayelise 07:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  222. Support - Huldra 09:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support - She kicks more butt than the others. -Wonderfool -- Nightsleeper 15:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Nightsleeper does not have suffrage, he's a sockpuppet of a user banned by arbcom. -- Phroziac . o º O ( ♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 16:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  223. Support. Palmiro | Talk 16:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  224. Support Dr. B 17:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  225. Support – AB C D e ✉ 18:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  226. Support Perfection is out of this world, but this is the only candidacy in this whole elections that I can support without reservations. Phil s 21:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  227. support William M. Connolley 22:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  228. Support Pavel Vozenilek 21:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  229. Support. Solid statement, proven record (even if slightly tarnished) Velvetsmog 23:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  230. Support -- Loopy e 00:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  231. Support -- Ancheta Wis 02:24, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  232. Support ntennis 04:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  233. Support for admin policy. — Simetrical ( talk •  contribs) 07:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  234. Support: all the right enemies. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  235. Support -- Ze miguel 08:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  236. Support Alphax 14:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  237. Support. Bahn Mi 19:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support Zebruh 20:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    I'm sorry, but your account is newer than 2005-9-30 and your edit count is less than 150, so your vote cannot count. -- TML1988 21:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  238. Support, a kind and considerate user who believes in and uses common sense. Thryduulf 21:23, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  239. Support, a very trustworthy user -- Francs 2000 00:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  240. Support. maclean25 00:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  241. Support. Jitse Niesen ( talk) 01:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  242. Support. can we clone this candidate? -- JWSchmidt 02:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  243. Support. Wiki (and the world) needs more hot libertarian chics. - Lawyer2b 05:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  244. Support. Chl 18:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  245. With some misgivings why?, Support. ++ Lar: t/ c 00:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  246. Support Knowledgable, and charming! Dominick (TALK) 00:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  247. Support. Mushroom 01:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  248. Support Good that he has been in the arbcom before, and has performed well in his time there. Borisblue 23:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  249. Support -- W.marsh 02:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  250.    freshgavin  TALK    03:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  251. Support: 1) 250 people can't be wrong. 2) 42 always was my lucky number. 3) Previous experience on the arbcom (which obviously didn't leave too bad of a taste in other people's mouths) 4) Clear signs of insanity (agreeing to run for arbcom again), but of the good kind. crazyeddie 04:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  252. Support -- Masonpatriot 05:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  253. Support -- mav 06:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  254. Support Marskell 12:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  255. Aphaia 07:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  256. Support --james °o 12:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  257. Support Mark 1 15:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  258. Support -- Supercoop 16:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  259. Support - David Gerard 16:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  260. Support. I like the user's take on IAR. Youngamerican 18:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  261. Support sannse (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  262. Support -- M7it 22:33, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  263. Support Robert McClenon 22:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  264. Support -- Randolph 03:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  265. Support -- Jacoplane 05:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  266. Support Pete.Hurd 07:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  267. Support — Phil | Talk 10:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  268. Support. Monicasdude 12:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  269. Support - kaal 17:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  270. Support Wildyoda( talk) 17:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  271. Support Nuff said. -- Cimon avaro; on a pogostick. 03:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  272. Support. PedanticallySpeaking 17:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  273. Support of course. Great editor, understands policy and says the things that need to be said when others are afraid to. -- Pak aran 22:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  274. Support. -- Stephan Schulz 23:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  275. Weak Support Weak, because too good to be true from the answers to the questions, and support because assume good faith. :) Fad (ix) 03:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  276. Support - 上村七美 13:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  277. Support. Eminently reasonable. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  278. Support fair. Derex 20:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  279. Support Jacqui ★ 20:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  280. Support. -- Neutrality talk 00:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  281. Support. NatusRoma 03:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  282. Support jnothman talk 03:43, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  283. Support good fit.-- Alhutch 04:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  284. Support. Love the WP:IAR bit. Bratsche talk | Esperanza 05:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  285. Support -- Durin 15:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  286. Support -- DanielCD 19:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  287. Support wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 20:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  288. Support. Pschemp | Talk 07:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support. Haven't been here long at all and already I've seen the extent of this editor's good work. KrazyCaley 08:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    KrazyCaley does not have suffrage; account was created on January 5 2006.-- Alhutch 16:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Vote withdrawn, newbie mistake. KrazyCaley 03:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  289. Support Jonpin 20:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  290. Support Flcelloguy ( A note?) 02:01, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  291. Support – Smyth\ talk 12:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  292. Support. ‣ᓛᖁ ♀ ᑐ 16:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  293. Support. Good performance so far, and seems to be able to put in lots of time without burning out! FreplySpang (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  294. Support Onefortyone 18:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  295. An excellent candidate. I've seen very good things from Mindspillage. encephalon 19:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  296. Support Alex43223 20:01, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  297. Support. +sj + 22:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  298. Support. Alai 23:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  299. Support. Canderson7 ( talk) 23:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Oppose

  1. Everyking 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. WhiteNight T | @ | C 01:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Oppose Refusal to take Arbcom action to stop the "war wheel" show bad judgment. Xoloz 02:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 03:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Account created in November 23rd, vote don't count. -- Jaranda wat's sup 04:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Oppose. zen master T 06:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Oppose. Conflict of interest — is a member of the Wikimedia PR department. Also refuses to address questions after supporting a severe ban which is widely condemned - Xed 20:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Weak Oppose - Good user, but I feel that new blood is needed Brian | (Talk) 22:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Oppose. -- HK 23:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Oppose. Durova 03:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Clicked the wrong link, sorry. reply
  9. Oppose. Need new ArbComm. SEWilco 04:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Very reluctantly oppose. I do not like to cast a negative vote, as I have strongly supported Mindspillage's RfA back in April, and I do hold her judgment quite highly in general. However, her actions in the recent Xed case (which also showed the lack of accountability of the current arbcom as a whole) give me the impression that there isn't enough passion to get it right and to further our ultimate goal of writing an encyclopedia. I do not think an arbitrator should support too harsh remedies that easily. — mark ✎ 12:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  11. Oppose as per Mark. -- BACbKA 22:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  12. Oppose. Candidate does not adequately address the nature of arbitration in their candidate statement. In ignorance: I must oppose. With so many candidates, the statement is the extent to which I can engage in becoming an informed voter. Any candidate so contemptuous of the demos as to make it difficult for me to become an informed voter: I must oppose, it bodes poorly for their capacity to take on social responsibility. Fifelfoo 22:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  13. Oppose. -- Masssiveego 07:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  14. Oppose-- Gozar 17:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  15. Oppose -- Davidpdx 12:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  16. Oppose Jared 12:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  17. -- Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  18. oppose Kingturtle 20:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  19. Oppose. Unable to tell fact from fiction. Andy Mabbett 21:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  20. Oppose. Preaky 23:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  21. Oppose. Some questionable decisions. Vulturell 17:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  22. Oppose per User:Vulturell - RachelBrown 12:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  23. Oppose -- Adrian Buehlmann 15:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  24. Oppose, very reluctantly, lazy or unwilling to thoroughly research her decisions. Wyss 17:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Neutral

  1. Neutral. I would support except that the question of neutrality is too vaguely answered by Mindspillage. -- Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 18:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Neutral A kind person, but I cannot support her beliefs, which seem to be feeding into the current atmosphere of fear on Wikipedia. karmafist 04:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    What beliefs would those be? 128.192.236.246 14:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    karmafist, could you please elaborate? Your statement is a bit vague for those of us not familiar with the material you are referring to. I would like to hear more about your opinion. -- DanielCD 19:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Neutral - if you prefer writing articles, then maybe you should just do that? -- NorkNork 21:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
You'd prefer someone who has not contributed in writing articles? What do you expect? Wikipedia is before anything else, about writing articles (and I'd expect someone prefering to write articles) and previous experiences on articles contribution is I believe primordial when dealing with a content dispute. Fad (ix) 03:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/Mindspillage&oldid=1089569105"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE