Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Filiocht

Now that it seems that the new ArbCom will be at least partly selected by the community, I've decided to unwithdraw. Filiocht | The kettle's on 14:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Given the uncertainty over the selection/election process, a state of affairs that effectively renders these candidacies meaningless, I have decided to withdraw for the moment. If and when clarity is restored, I may reverse this decision. Filiocht | The kettle's on 09:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC) reply

I've been around since about July 2003, one way or the other, and became an admin around the end of that year. Anyone with an interest in the more obscure corners of 20th century literature may have seen some of my edits.

I have no position on the performance of the existing ArbCom, and nothing I say should be taken as implicit criticism. I run on a simple platform. I would aim to follow the following basic principles:

  • Equality of respect: the same standards of behaviour should be extended to and expected of all users. Being an admin gives me no rights that are not also extended to non-admins, I deserve no more leeway than someone who has been here for 3 months. Of course, I exclude the real newcomers, who should never be bitten.
  • Talking is better than blocking, discussing is better than voting. In the last resort, blocking/banning is better than letting one person drain the time, energy and goodwill of the many.

Beyond these, I have no preconceptions and would expect to grow into the role according to the needs of Wikipedia. Filiocht | The kettle's on 14:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Questions


Support

  1. -- Sean| Bla ck 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Michael Snow 00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. – ugen64 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. — Kirill Lok s hin 00:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. -- Jaranda wat's sup 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Support. – Quadell ( talk) ( bounties) 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Support - Mackensen (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Support. -- GraemeL (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Support. Couldn't agree more with your Basic Principles. Batmanand 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  11. Need more like him. Dmcdevit· t 00:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  12. Support. A reasonable, pleasant, helpful editor with good judgement. -- NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  13. Haukur 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  14. Support. — Bunchofgrapes ( talk) 00:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  15. Strong support. The best. Ambi 00:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  16. Support he's a good one. -- Angelo 00:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  17. JYolkowski // talk 01:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  18. Support - eminently sensible and level headed - I believe Filiocht would make an excellent artbitrator. Worldtraveller 01:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  19. Support -- Dragonfiend 01:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  20. Tony Sidaway| Talk 01:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  21. Shanes 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    KC. 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    • KC. does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 20:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC). — Cryptic (talk) 04:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  22. Support Staffelde 01:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  23. Support.-- ragesoss 01:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  24. TacoDeposit 01:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  25. Support -- Duk 01:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  26. I will support anyone who demonstrates great levelheadedness, and I can think of no better example than Filiocht. Johnleemk | Talk 01:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  27. Support -- Dlyons493 Talk 02:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  28. Strong support. Worthy of trust. Grace Note 02:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support-- Kf4bdy 02:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    • Kf4bdy does not have suffrage; he had only 62 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). — Cryptic (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  29. Support -- Arwel ( talk) 02:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  30. Support. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 02:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support - Has sense - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Account too new (created December 28, 2005 [1]). — FREAK OF NURxTURE ( TALK) 03:15, Jan. 9, 2006
  31. Support. I only hope the string is long enough that arbcom duties will not diminish this editor's truly impressive contributions. Jonathunder 02:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  32. Support Trustworthy editor. Xoloz 02:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  33. brenneman (t) (c) 02:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  34. Support - One of the very best editors I know of. Paul August ☎ 02:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  35. King of All the Franks 03:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  36. Bobet 03:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  37. older≠ wiser 03:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  38. Support - ...based on his answers to the nomination questions and general contributions to Wikipedia. I like his style. → P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 03:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  39. Crotalus horridus ( TALK • CONTRIBS) 03:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  40. Support. Rhobite 04:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  41. Support ← Hob 04:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  42. Support -- Spangineer es  (háblame) 04:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  43. — Charles P.  (Mirv) 04:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  44. Support -- Crunch 04:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  45. uh-huh' Grutness... wha? 04:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  46. Support -- Daniel 05:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  47. Support Rx StrangeLove 05:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  48. Support Fred Bauder 05:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  49. Support Kit 05:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  50. --best, kevin kzollman][ talk 05:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  51. Support -- Tabor 05:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  52. Support — Catherine\ talk 05:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  53. Support. android 79 06:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  54. Support. -- Angr ( tɔk) 06:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  55. Support. Level head. Sam Vimes 06:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  56. Support Clear statement, been long on the project, openminded and good answers. feydey 07:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  57. Support. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  58. Support -- Wetman 07:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  59. Support. siafu 07:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  60. Support-- cj | talk 07:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  61. Support. Good principles. / blahedo ( t) 07:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  62. Support. -- Muchness 07:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  63. Support. utcursch | talk 07:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  64. Support. Jmabel | Talk 08:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  65. Support. — Quarl ( talk) 2006-01-09 08:25 Z
  66. Support. Trustworthy — mark ✎ 08:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  67. Support. Common sense wikipedian! -- Michalis Famelis 08:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  68. Support: He's proven to be fair minded, patient and sincerely committed to the project. Giano | talk 08:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  69. Support, "common sense wikipedian" says it all. -- MPerel ( talk | contrib) 08:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  70. Support. My toughest decision yet... hope my hunch isn't wrong. why? ++ Lar: t/ c 08:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  71. Support platform, experience --- Charles Stewart 09:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  72. Support. -- Kefalonia 09:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  73. Support. -- Viriditas 10:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  74. Support as has been said above. JesseW, the juggling janitor 08:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC) (fixed my mistaken placement; shouldn't vote when half-asleep) JesseW, the juggling janitor 10:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  75. Support -- kingboyk 10:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  76. Support as Jonathunder. -- It's-is-not-a-genitive 11:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  77. Support you betcha. Geogre 11:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  78. Support -- Nick Boalch ?!? 11:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  79. Support Demiurge 11:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  80. Support Mais bien sur. -- Peripatetic 11:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  81. RobertG ♬ talk 11:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  82. Enough XP. Basic principles are purr-fect. Bonus points for listing wikilove. ;) — Nightstallion (?) 11:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  83. Support. the wub "?!" RFR - a good idea? 12:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  84. Support Sarah Ewart 12:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  85. Support very level headed person. Would be able to handle the position.   ALKIVAR ™ 12:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  86. Support at last, a person who mentions WP:AGF in the statement.  Grue  13:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  87. Support, trustworthy. R adiant _>|< 13:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  88. Support. -- Cel e stianpower háblame 13:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  89. Support, I trust his comitment to fairness. Thryduulf 13:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  90. Support. Experienced, levelheaded user. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 14:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  91. Support. -- Frelke 14:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  92. Support. A very level head. Mark 1 14:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  93. Support.-- Eloquence * 14:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  94. Support. Blank Verse 14:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  95. Support -- Alabamaboy 15:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  96. Support. Jitse Niesen ( talk) 15:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  97. Support. Great approach.— Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 15:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  98. Support Proto  t  c 15:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  99. Support From the candidate statement: "We're here to build an encyclopaedia, not a playground." Damn right. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  100. Support Eugene van der Pijll 16:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  101. Support dab (ᛏ) 17:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  102. Support. -- Rbellin| Talk 17:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  103. Support -- Comics 17:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  104. Support -- Masonpatriot 18:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  105. Support The Literate Engineer 19:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  106. Support. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  107. Support TestPilot 19:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  108. Support. Thinks outside the wikibox. - Xed 20:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  109. Support Has a great vision!!! Tarret 20:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  110. Support for his levelheadedness. Pilatus 20:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  111. Support We need editors like him in the ArbCom Aldux 21:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  112. Support Theo (Talk) 21:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  113. jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 22:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  114. Support Good attitude. — Matthew Brown ( T: C) 22:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  115. Support. We need more people who will assume good faith and not forget wikilove. H e rmione 1980 22:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  116. Support Naturenet | Talk 22:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  117. Support. -- HK 22:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  118. Splash talk 22:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  119. Support absolutely his attitude. -- Ghirla | talk 22:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  120. Support. <K F> 22:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  121. Support sentiments (except "wikilove") appreciated. Avriette 22:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  122. Support. Wally 00:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  123. Support. Tupsharru 00:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  124. Support, primarily for opinion on desysopping but also for statements generally. — Simetrical ( talk •  contribs) 01:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  125. Support Maltmomma (chat) 02:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  126. Support for wanting democracy in wiki Rayc 02:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  127. Support. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 03:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  128. Support, experienced, good statement. Like the hundreds or so before me, I support. Ian Manka Questions? Talk to me! 04:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  129. Support - Vsmith 05:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  130. Support. Neutrality talk 05:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  131. Support, I like the policy abakharev 05:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  132. Support Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  133. Support. -- Fire Star 07:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  134. Support. -- Carnildo 08:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  135. Support. Anville 09:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  136. Support Willmcw/ user:Will Beback/10:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  137. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 11:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  138. Support Robdurbar 12:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  139. Support. A great package: good answers to the questions, good attitude, consistently level-headed, assumes good faith... Rje 13:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  140. Support. enochlau ( talk) 14:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  141. Support. HGB 18:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  142. Support, per above. Ral315 (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  143. Support, I'm sure will do a good job. -- G Rutter 20:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  144. Support Keith D. Tyler 21:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Support. Understands the point of Wikipedia. Smeggysmeg 22:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
    Smeggysmeg does not have suffrage -- 68 edits, account made in October. -- Phroziac . o º O ( ♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 23:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  145. Support — Saravask 23:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  146. Support. maclean25 00:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  147. Support (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 00:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  148. Support KTC 05:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  149. Support-- Woggly 08:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  150. Support: -- Bhadani 09:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  151. Support-- R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 11:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  152. Support. Palmiro | Talk 12:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  153. Support -- Terence Ong Talk 13:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  154. Support -- Syrthiss 13:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  155. Support. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 14:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  156. Support. Andre ( talk) 14:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  157. Support-- Gozar 17:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  158. Support. — David Levy 17:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  159. support. -- Svartalf 18:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC) user seems a solid wikipedian, and as an Irishman, he may help offset US dominance here. reply
  160. Support. Zach (Smack Back) Fair use policy 19:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  161. Vote signed by: --- Responses to Chazz's talk page. Signed by Chazz @ 19:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  162. Support doktorb | words 21:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  163. Support -- Rye1967 21:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  164. support: Ombudsman 22:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  165. Support Timrollpickering 01:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  166. Support - "Equality of respect. ... Talking is better than blocking." (yea!) perhaps you could teach Phroziac a little wikietiquette. r b-j 02:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  167. Support -- Loopy e 04:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  168. Support - Huldra 09:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  169. Experienced and civil. Zocky 11:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  170. Support. Carbonite | Talk 18:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  171. Support – AB C D e ✉ 18:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  172. Support - very strong points, one of the best candidates. -- NorkNork 20:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  173. Support. Good candidate statement. Velvetsmog 20:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  174. JoaoRicardo talk 21:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  175. support William M. Connolley 21:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  176. Support, because this page is fucking funny. — FREAK OF NURxTURE ( TALK) 22:35, Jan. 12, 2006
  177. Support — Stumps 23:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  178. Support. A model Wikipedian whose judgment I respect more than my own, and whose support of this project's best and noblest ideals are part of the reason I keep coming back to this place. Jwrosenzweig 06:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  179. Support. Alphax 12:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  180. Support - Mar tá sé ina chonai i hÉireann. -- Irishpunktom\ talk 12:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  181. Support. Smerdis of Tlön 15:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  182. Support. Qualified and has the right idea. Superm401 | Talk 22:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  183. Support - good user -- Francs 2000 01:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  184. Support appears to be a good candidate with a good editing record and the right attitude (wikilove). Cedars 17:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  185. Derex 18:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  186. Support. Trust the user; good candidate statement -- Marcika 18:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  187. Support Mr. Know-It-All 22:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  188. Support. Mushroom 01:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  189. Support. ( SEWilco 03:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)) reply
  190. Support. ntennis 07:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  191. Support. Seems well adjusted, balanced, and neutral, based on responses to questions (see the questions link in the statement section). In addition, Filiocht strikes me as particularly thoughtful, and hence will make good judgements, and re-introduce the much missed principle of consensus. -- Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 18:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  192. Strong support. Well spoken, excellent editing history. -- Omniwolf 19:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  193. Support. WilliamKF 22:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  194. Support-- Wikityke 01:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  195. Support Alex43223 06:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  196. Support Sunray 06:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  197. Support – experienced. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  198. Support If this was a European-style parliamentary election with a transferable vote, this candidate would likely get my top vote. Youngamerican 14:56, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  199. Support. — Lowellian ( reply) 18:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  200. Support -- Jacoplane 05:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  201. Support — Phil | Talk 09:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  202. Support. Monicasdude 12:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  203. Support because we absolutely need you as an arbitrator. Nothing short of a return to a focus on Wikilove and AGF while dealing with those editors that do not edit in good faith can solve Wikipedia's ills. Filiocht is clearly our best shot at that. - Taxman Talk 14:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  204. Support -- Doc ask? 16:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  205. Support - kaal 16:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  206. Support -- Hoary 09:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  207. - muriel@pt 16:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  208. Support. PedanticallySpeaking 16:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  209. Support Tuohirulla 23:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  210. Support — Highly qualified and eminently sensible. Plus, quotes Kant on his userpage. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  211. Support - a very interesting mind, I've realized. Chick Bowen 03:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  212. Support - A guy who totally has it together. Probably knows where his towel is. - JustinWick 03:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  213. Strong Support. I love your principles. Bratsche talk | Esperanza 04:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  214. Support Secretlondon 15:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  215. Support Pschemp | Talk 07:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  216. Support with no hesitation. Deb 10:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  217. Support Sounds good to me. -- AySz88^ - ^ 00:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  218. Support Flcelloguy ( A note?) 01:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  219. Support – Smyth\ talk 12:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  220. Support Charles Matthews 15:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  221. Support, with the greatest pleasure. If a vote may be said to be unneeded, this one is; nevertheless I'm so very glad to be able to do my bit for so peerless a candidate. I remember how, ironically, Filiocht momentarily pulled out some months ago. It is WP's fortune that much has changed. encephalon 19:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  222. Support -- DS1953 talk 19:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  223. Support -- Spondoolicks 21:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  224. Support Alai 23:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  225. Support. Canderson7 ( talk) 23:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  226. Support CDThieme 23:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Oppose

  1. Oppose questions. David | explanation | Talk 00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Oppose, questions. See my voting rationale. Talrias ( t | e | c) 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. — Guan aco 02:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Oppose Davidpdx 12:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Oppose Candidate statement too vague on arbitration to case an informed vote on their merits as an arbitrator. Without information: oppose. Fifelfoo 00:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Oppose actually, I have nothing at all against this user becoming arbitrator...the vote is just way too one-sided. If it gets close maybe I'll come in and change it :) ℬastique▼ parℓer♥ voir♑ 00:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Oppose-- Masssiveego 07:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Oppose -- Adrian Buehlmann 14:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Oppose: I'm not too for the whole withdraw, unwithdraw thing. Dr. B 21:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  11. Oppose -- per Dr. B -- Ignignot 17:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  12. Regretfully Oppose. His strong support of Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Code_of_Conduct concerns me because it stands in stark contrast with his claimed desire to avoid Wikipedia as a policy playground. -- Gmaxwell 18:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  13. Oppose -- Knucmo2 19:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  14. -- Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  15. Oppose. Preaky 06:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  16. oppose Kingturtle 20:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  17. Oppose - Hoekenheef 12:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
  18. Oppose ( Bjorn Tipling 07:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)) reply

Neutral

  1. I have no doubt that Filiocht wouldn't be a bad Arbitrator, but that doesn't mean he'd be a good one. Also, it would be a shame to lose one of the most prolific contributors of Featured content. Ingoolemo  talk 17:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/Filiocht&oldid=1223288416"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE