Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shell Kinney

Without pointing specific fingers there are a lot of things broke about the way ArbCom works at the moment - mailing list leaks that haven't been plugged, super secret trials and information - tons of things that seemed like silly little flea bites when they started are now out of control festering sores that no one knows how to fix. I'm afraid my style is a bit more cauterize the wounds and a bit less touchy-feely recovery, but I think some honesty, frankness and transparency might just be the things that can turn around some of these disturbing trends. More at User:Shell Kinney/ArbCom2008.

Support

  1. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  2. Ѕandahl ♥ 00:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  3. Support. Further comments available at my ACE2008 notes page. -- El on ka 00:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  4. -- PeaceNT ( talk) 00:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  5. iride scent 00:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  6. kur ykh 01:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  7. I think Michelle would be a great addition to ArbCom. Level-headed in my experience and loves to talk about issues and process them critically. Mike H. Fierce! 01:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  8. As long as you promise to be more careful with your e-mail? [<-account creation team in-joke] L'Aquatique talk 02:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  9. Daniel ( talk) 02:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  10. Support - intelligent and fair. Tundrabuggy ( talk) 03:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  11. Prodego talk 03:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  12. 6SJ7 ( talk) 04:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  13. Experienced in mediation. ( full rationale) rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 04:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  14. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this message! - 11:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  15. Support. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 18:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  16. Could do a very good job. AGK 20:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  17. I'm surprised to see myself saying this, considering that she just article banned me for a week, and I strongly disagree with her decision there. But overall, I think she's got the best interests of the project in mind, and therefore I must Support. -- Levine2112 discuss 02:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  18. Support. A very fair minded and savvy admin who seems to have the wisdom needed to be a referee, judge, and juror in the Committee. -- Fyslee / talk 05:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  19. Given the candidate's lengthy history in dispute resolution I'd expect to see more opposers taking issue with Shell's performance as a dispute mediator. The lack of criticism on these grounds, on top of her thoughtful answers, suggests to me she'd make a good and pretty impartial Arbitrator. -- JayHenry ( talk) 06:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  20. Sarah 09:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  21. Support -- Ynhockey ( Talk) 18:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  22. Support The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  23. Aye ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  24. Support -- maclean 00:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  25. IronDuke 00:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  26. Support - I don't see anything in the oppose section which can hinder my vote...-- Comet styles 06:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  27. Support -- Peter cohen ( talk) 10:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  28. Kauffner ( talk) 14:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  29. Michael Snow ( talk) 20:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  30. Support A steady, experienced hand is needed here. Mervyn Emrys ( talk) 01:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 150 mainspace edits by November 1. ST47 ( talk) 01:20, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
    Vote reinstated - Lar's CU confirms Mervyn Emrys eligibility across alternate accounts.-- Tznkai ( talk) 06:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  31. Joe Nu tter 01:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  32. Support. Jehochman Talk 04:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  33. Good candidate and I approve. ⇒ SWATJester Son of the Defender 23:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  34. Terence ( talk) 10:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  35. @pple complain 00:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  36. Support based on existing work with the Mediation Committee; candidate has experience, appears to handle conflict resolution well, encouraging with praise, and supporting people to work toward a solution. I believe and trust the candidate's statement that she has a desire to help people and to help move the project forward. SilkTork * YES! 01:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  37. Support JeremyMcCracken ( talk) ( contribs) 04:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  38. Has experience and dedication, and my trust. Full rationale: User:Camaron/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008. Camaron | Chris (talk) 12:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  39. Support -- VS talk 01:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  40. Support Dreadstar † 06:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  41. I trust Shell's judgment, and have used her as a go to person to take over OTRS tickets. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-08 t00:51z
  42. Indeed Ecoleetage ( talk) 04:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  43. Support, seems levelheaded and unlikely to try to create policy. Like the response that footnoted quotes overstepped, not so much that we should "ramp up" default to delete, but does not seem prepared to force such a measure. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  44. Support. An excellent mediator; I have no doubt that the user will make an equally excellent member on the ArbCom. Bless sins ( talk) 15:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  45. Support I like their clue and forthrightness. - Eldereft ( cont.) 23:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  46. Support Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 02:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  47. Support - I've had nothing but positive experiences with this editor. Dougie WII ( talk) 03:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  48. Support Sumoeagle179 ( talk) 11:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  49. Support - BusterD ( talk) 13:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  50. Support - I liked most of the answers to the questions (though I hope she'll take another, more critical, look at how consensus is working on this site, because I think she's mistaken in her belief that it's scaled well). I didn't find any of the opposes persuasive, especially in light of her specific commitments with regards to recusal. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 21:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  51. Support Rivertorch ( talk) 09:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  52. Support Hobartimus ( talk) 13:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  53. Support JBsupreme ( talk) 19:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  54. Support -- Philosopher  Let us reason together. 21:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  55. Support -- Samir 07:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  56. Support views on BLP. Also some decent idea on protecting confidentiality. And we do sometimes need less touchy-feelyness Nil Einne ( talk) 13:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  57. Support -- AAA765 ( talk) 04:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  58. Support Shell was amongst those about whose candidacies I did not take a voting position last year; my ambivalence persists this year, but I guess that I am persuaded that the candidate would prove a nice addition to the committee. Joe 07:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  59. Support: Shell's no nonsense style, her knowledge of WP and her experience—especially her mediation experience—make her an excellent choice for ArbCom. Sunray ( talk) 07:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  60. Support - perfect candidate for committee. Caulde 14:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  61. Support. Epbr123 ( talk) 14:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  62. SQL Query me! 20:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  63. Support -- lucasbfr talk 21:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  64. Support -- PseudoOne ( talk) 23:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  65. Has some imteresting ideas. ++ Lar: t/ c 23:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Oppose

  1. Oppose, although nothing personal: I have chosen a group of seven editors that will make the best new additions to ArbCom, reflecting diversity in editing areas, users who will work well together, as well as some differing viewpoints.-- Maxim (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  2. Nufy8 ( talk) 00:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose. Rschen7754 ( T C) 00:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  4. Oppose - Shot info ( talk) 00:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  5. Voyaging (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  6. Oppose. Mathsci ( talk) 00:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  7. Oppose, reasoning at User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  8. Oppose extremely troubling conduct from this user makes me believe that this is the worse possible candidate listed. Ottava Rima ( talk) 01:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  9. Disappointed with some of her handling of OTRS tickets. krimpet ✽ 01:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  10. Caspian blue 01:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  11. Steven Walling (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  12. Oppose Majorly talk 01:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  13. See reasoning. east718 01:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  14. - NuclearWarfare contact me My work 01:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  15. iMatthew 02:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  16. Oppose. -- Mixwell! Talk 02:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  17. Atmoz ( talk) 02:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  18. ArbCom must be disbanded and replaced with a system which actually works. Sorry, I oppose. Bstone ( talk) 02:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  19. Oppose. rootology ( C)( T) 03:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  20. I came to support, but have reconsidered, and now I feel there are better candidates for the committee. Master&Expert ( Talk) 04:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  21. Oppose: Was aggressive towards me in the past while trying to defend a friend of hers on the wiki. Definitely not suited for AC. -- Matt57 ( talk• contribs) 05:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  22. Oppose. Everyking ( talk) 05:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  23. Oppose Don't trust candidate's judgement. -- Folantin ( talk) 09:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  24. Oppose - there are better candidates; not enough experience in content. Maybe next year? // roux    editor review 10:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  25. Less drama, please. Stifle ( talk) 10:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  26. PhilKnight ( talk) 10:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  27. — neuro (talk) 10:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  28. John Vandenberg ( chat) 10:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  29. Oppose due to concerns about impartiality. Skinwalker ( talk) 11:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  30. Oppose Verbal chat 12:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  31. Rebecca ( talk) 13:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  32. Oppose See my reasons in User:Secret/ArbCom. Note if there isn't a comment on the candidate there, I was on vacation and couldn't edit the past weekend, will leave one today. Secret account 13:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  33. This was bizarre. Moreschi ( talk) 15:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  34. Oppose Colchicum ( talk) 15:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  35. Crystal whacker ( My 2008 ArbCom votes) 15:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  36. Syn ergy 19:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  37. On balance. Davewild ( talk) 20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  38. Glass Cobra 00:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  39. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  40. Alex fusco 5 02:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  41. ѕwirlвoy  ₪ 05:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  42. Guettarda ( talk) 06:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  43. Oppose per User:SandyGeorgia. Thanks!-- Cerejota ( talk) 06:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  44. Oppose Maybe next time. I am really on the fence with this one but not totally comfortable yet to vote for. Want to see her stand on her own more and not back her friends, sorry, -- CrohnieGal Talk 13:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  45. Oppose Excessive favoritism.-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 13:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  46. Oppose -- Aude ( talk) 15:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  47. - filelake shoe 19:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  48. Oppose. Миша 13 22:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  49. Oppose not entrely comfortable with her judgement of situations Gnan garra 01:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  50. Questionable past judgments that were not neutral. - Fedayee ( talk) 04:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  51. Gentgeen ( talk) 10:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  52. Kusma ( talk) 12:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  53. Splash - tk 23:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  54. Oppose Lacks judgment in matters involving allies.-- G-Dett ( talk) 00:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  55. Oppose -- Ivan Štambuk ( talk) 07:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  56. Oppose - Nothing personal, merely not one of the four I selected to support this year. jc37 10:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  57. Oppose dougweller ( talk) 14:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  58. oppose Slrubenstein | Talk 19:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  59. Oppose as I have done to anyone whose answer to the confidentiality question hasn't satisfied me. This candidate hasn't answered it at all which is by definition unsatisfactory. Cynical ( talk) 22:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  60. Wronkiew ( talk) 02:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  61. Oppose Law courts have secret discussions before handing down the vertidict. How different is it with ArbCom? (I'm not saying ArbCom is a wikiLaw-Court, but it functions a little like a law court) Leujohn ( talk)
  62. Oppose - Shyam ( T/ C) 09:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  63. Oppose Jon513 ( talk) 16:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  64. Tex ( talk) 20:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  65. Oppose Fred Talk 20:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  66. Oppose, simply put, there are more qualified candidates out there. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 04:31, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  67. Oppose - Per User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 02:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  68. Oppose — xaosflux Talk 05:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  69. Oppose per SandyGeorgia. Kelly hi! 16:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  70. Oppose although with no animus. Geogre ( talk) 19:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  71. Oppose Switzpaw ( talk) 22:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Shell_Kinney&oldid=1223288374"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE