Hi Zamekrizeni! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at
the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (
talk).
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
Referencing for beginners, or ask at the
help desk. Once you have provided at least one
reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
Qpalzmmzlapq |
talk |
contribs22:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Rob Pallin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Las Vegas Aces. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moritz Wagner (basketball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
JTtheOG (
talk)
16:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Heikki Leime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
TPS Turku. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframetalk05:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Rodions Kurucs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
VEF Rīga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Schempp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Joeykai (
talk)
07:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Kirill Tulupov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Spartak Moskva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Mikael Johansson (ice hockey, born 1985), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Hamilton Bulldogs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Hannu Pikkarainen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
TPS Turku. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Maguire (ice hockey) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Joeykai (
talk)
14:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joren van Pottelberghe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Joeykai (
talk)
07:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Mason (Canadian-Dutch ice hockey player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Joeykai (
talk)
07:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Hello, Zamekrizeni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Derrick Allen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
Wadley and
Gadsden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Gilmour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Joeykai (
talk)
05:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Ellis (ice hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Joeykai (
talk)
05:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Verner Kohs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
VEF Riga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Simon Birgander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Power Forward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Elijah Macon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clandell Cetoute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Rikster2 (
talk)
14:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maverick Rowan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran
(talk)11:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Oliver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran
(talk)11:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
Anoptimistix (
talk)
09:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Hello - Thank you for creating basketball articles. When doing so, could you please try to conform to consensus formats? An example is that high schools are added this way: [[St. Patrick High School (New Jersey)|St. Patrick]] as opposed to showing the words "high school" at the end. Also, player categories (such as "Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball players") are not added until the player appears in a regular-season or playoff game for the team. Thanks.
Rikster2 (
talk)
13:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darin Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an23:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
A page you started (Amine Noua) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor
Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Good work. A nice amount of detail for a new sports article, Most new sports articles are very bare bones, good to see someone doing the extra bit of effort.
To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's
talk page.
... could you please add Wikiprojects to the Talk page? This allows project members to track articles and contribute to them. If it is easier, you can just cut and paste the Talk pages of a couple I did for you, just replace the names in the "listas" field.
Shake Milton for a college player,
Yovel Zoosman for a player who did not play in college and
Derrick Allen for one who has participated in both? Thanks
Rikster2 (
talk)
14:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)reply
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Braydon Hobbs. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Stop editing the
Braydon Hobbs article. I have reported the activity between you and OnkelCharlie at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. I did not focus the report on you specifically as I think you have at least tried to communicate, but the admin who handles it may disagree and review your behavior. At the end of the day, you should not be reverting each others' edits for days on end no matter who is right (see
Wikipedia:3RR). Let the admins do their job and give the article a rest. Thanks.
Rikster2 (
talk)
13:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Hi, Zamekrizeni. Please note that Chance Comanche does not yet meet the notability criteria for a professional basketball player as outlined at
WP:NHOOPS. So rather than have the article deleted, I have moved it into your user space at
User talk:Zamekrizeni/Chance Comanche. The article can be moved back into main space after this person plays in a qualifying professional league. If you have questions, please ask. —
CactusWriter (talk)16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.
You may submit articles using
this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. –
Reidgreg (
talk)
18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Zamekrizeni. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Mark Daigneault (basketball coach), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion discussion, such as at
Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here. —
Bagumba (
talk)
17:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
If you're new to the process,
articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on
how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Hello, Zamekrizeni. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Cantamessa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please read the above policy before editing
Paolo Banchero again. If Banchero was primarily known for playing on the Italian national team, that would be one thing, but he's not. He's primarily known for his American career.OhNoitsJamieTalk00:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)reply
You have been blocked from editing Johan Roijakkers for a period of one week for violating the
3 revert rule. You two need to resolve the dispute on the article talk page. If at an impasse, use a
dispute resolution request, like an
WP:RFC or
WP:RSN (
WP:DRNnot recommended). But you two cannot continue to flood the revision history by violating the 3RR bright line
edit warring rule (by quite a bit as it happens). Ping me here if you have any question concerning this partial block (not on my talk page, please). Thank you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
El_C18:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Deletion
discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes.
Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is
notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pilaz}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)