Hello, I'm
Roscelese. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. –
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs)
19:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
-Hi Roscelese this in Yinyangbalance; what exactly was not neutral? And define 'Neutral', for the topic at hand is far from neutral. I believe your complete reversal of the addition to the page was unwarranted. Wikis are designed to grow and be organic. What you did was censorship in favor of one side of an argument. I'm up for discussion on this but not on your terms of censorship. I will be reinstating segments of my additions on a daily basis, point by point which should give a chance for specific debate and edits in the spirit of being 'neutral' as I understand it.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Antifeminism, you may be
blocked from editing. –
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs)
05:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Yinyangbalance! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
This is untrue. There are no "Gangs" of editors on Wikipedia purely out against you.
A Wild Abigail Appears! Capture me. Moves. 05:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
I never said Gangs of editors were after me. Your comment is neither helpful nor encouraging.