Hello! How's my editing? Please drop me a line. -- Wykypydya
Note of caution: tagging an edit as possible OR is not an acceptable way to edit/contribute to wikipedia; especially when said edit is blatant OR and admitted POV. By all means continue to be Be Bold. Good luck.-- ZayZayEM 03:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Helpme inquiry: What kind of template (i.e. cleanup template) should one use on Wikipedia for a plot summary that needs to be explained better?
Hi, please try {{ Expand-section}}. -- Selket Talk 05:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Wykypydya. While there had been some discussion here about whether your username met Wikipedia policy on what usernames editors can use, the result was to allow it, and that discussion has now been closed. If you would like to see what concerns were raised, you can still find that discussion in the archive ( here). You do not need to change your username. However, if you ever wish to do so, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. -- HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 19:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC) HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 19:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Please note, your userspace /vandalism subpages have been deleted following a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wykypydya/Vandalism. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 04:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi :) Uh, let's start over. I didn't like how we started, and I didn't like how I had about three weeks of work to do. I, and somebody else are going to be coaching you and User:Deep_Impact, since although I've been around and seen a lot, I haven't "coached" before. Mac Δαvιs ❖ 03:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
"'Unsourced statements'? WTF? I put the 'citation needed' template in there." That's EXACTLY my point. It is UNCITED. "Uncited" means it needs a citation. As for lack of clarity, if you can't see that I doubt that I could convince you. Let's just say that the thoughts in your head aren't coming across in your words. I suggest that you get help writing, then if it makes sense I'll leave it if it's relevant and cited. Ward3001 02:56, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia guidelines on courtesy regarding edit summaries. I have recently edited Private company limited by shares and your comment regarding the correction of grammar you made, whilst accurate, could be construed as offensive. Matt Adore 15:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Sexual stereotyping, by
Emiellaiendiay, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Sexual stereotyping fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Sexual stereotyping, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Sexual stereotyping itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
22:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The following is a copy of someone's comment and follow-up that was placed in the vandalism section of my userpage.
Please read Wikipedia guidelines on courtesy regarding edit summaries. I have recently edited Private company limited by shares and your comment regarding the correction of grammar you made, whilst accurate, could be construed as offensive. Matt Adore 15:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to child sexual abuse. As it is a highly contested page, we are trying to limit any additions to fully cited, scientific sources. Adding a statement and then tagging it "citation needed" yourself, or adding a section and then tagging it a stub yourself is not a good idea in this case. A reference to a fictional television show is particularly unhelpful. Also, the location of your edit was not well chosen. Please join us on the Talk:child sexual abuse where a lot of this kind of work is being done prior to inserting it on the page. Thanks very much. - Jmh123 21:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
If a user adds an IP report to Wikipedia: Abuse reports, should the user then edit the accused user's talk page to inform them that they have reported them, or will an automated bot do it, or should they not be explicitly informed? (I have had several experiences in which administrative deliberations took place about my username and I wasn't informed (though I should have been) until they were concluded.) -- Wykypydya 22:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to variance for reasons discussed at talk:variance. Michael Hardy 00:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, S.O.L.A.R. System, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Nen yedi • ( Deeds• Talk) 21:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Previous "help" statement:
We need a WP technician! Someone has hacked the entire Wikipedia site (or main template) so that all articles now have as a header under the title: "From Wikipedia, the free Pokemon encyclopedia"! This is interesting yet very bizarre!
It looks like it's been fixed. -- Wykypydya ( talk) 06:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya, I did some cleanup on the lead at Obsidian (video game). FYI, it's totally fine to remove unsourced information, but strikeouts should probably be avoided. See also Wikipedia:Verifiability. Cheers, -- El on ka 02:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Wykypydya. Please remember that you must identify to the foundation prior to the start of the poll, which means until today midnight (UTC). Additionally you have to have a global account, so please link your accounts - at least on Meta and enwiki - together. According to the rules you would otherwise be disqualified. Best regards, -- Thogo (Talk) Some thoughts about enwiki 10:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
I have copied the following incorrectly-placed comment that was written on my userpage from a non-vandalism section, to here. -- Wykypydya ( talk) 00:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I undid your edit to this page, because there are 68 other links which redirect to the page, and listing all of them would be impossible. In general, it is best to list only those redirects which have other meanings as well; "secks" really isn't something people would type when searching for leetspeak. -- Soap Talk/ Contributions 09:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Pingas (internet meme) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Taelus ( talk) 23:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Now that's a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.251.125.65 ( talk) 13:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
can i use use/link your username on my userspace in order to say i agree with you on the subject of wikipedia vandalism?, and whats up with autosign, i hate that.
See Wykypydya's vandalism for my comment to that, as it does not fit here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonez1113 ( talk • contribs) 22:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
i mean it is vandalism and i do not mean to burden you with moving it.-- Sonez1113 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC).
Hey uh, feel free to clean this to save space. --17:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)17:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonez1113 ( talk • contribs)
Please delete this text here in this header. -- Sonez1113 ( talk) 17:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lake-tuz-turkey-macroscopic-in-turkey-google-earth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on RUU requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Cindamuse (
talk)
20:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lake-tuz-turkey-in-the-middle-of-turkey-google-earth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page List of Mr. Bean episodes, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Hertz1888 ( talk) 01:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as PINGAS, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention)
05:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept unsourced material or original research, such as this edit of yours to List of supporting characters on South Park. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Material lacking such sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished syntheses of previously published material, is not permitted. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 18:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Per WP:SEEALSO, can you please provide a brief annotation, since the link's relevance is not immediately apparent? Thanks, and best regards. -- Muhandes ( talk) 09:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
What is this fake scenario you speak of? (the fake scenario on my user page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonez1113 ( talk • contribs) 22:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Nevermind, I must have just thought I saw that. Also I am aware I can recover it from the edit summary, I just didn't feel like recovering the words of a personal attack creator who acts without evidence, I mean jeez, he didn't even check my contributions to see that I have never have vandalised any article.-- Sonez1113 ( talk) 18:56, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello Wykypydya, are you aware of how one can change their signature? I've just been wondering about that.-- Sonez1113 ( talk) 19:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Sonez1113 has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
I don't know, it looks like they're leaving userpages alone and deleting vandalism subpages. But they left my "idiotic reversal subpages" up. -- Wykypydya ( talk) 22:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary here, I wanted to point out that both are technically acceptable. – anna 01:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:ENGVAR, you should avoid making large-scale changes to English style in articles based on personal taste ("plain stupid", "sounds terrible"). Both 'a historic' and 'an historic' are used today in educated writing; neither is incorrect. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 02:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Wykypydya, good on you for changing "an historic" to "a historic." The Chicago Manual of Style specifically addresses this & says "a historic" is the correct usage. Good luck on your crusade. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 22:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Please explain this. Materialscientist ( talk) 04:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Another user has expressed a concern about your userpage, particularly the bits that appear to be Jimbo Wales' signature. We have a policy about that: signature forgery. I wonder if you'd see your way clear to remove those? Also, please remember to stay civil in your edit summaries. I'm a little concerned about the ones I saw today. - Philippe 05:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I like the fact that you have a big brain and a ton of energy. I think you want to help. After all, you're spending your valuable time changing the "an" to help Wikipedia, right?
But I worry about your future here. You are starting to draw heat, my friend. I see you've been around since 2007. You certainly know that this is a collaborative project. Statements like "...Who the hell says "an historic"?..." and "...People who write "an" before a non-silent "h" are stupid..." is not a good plan. Nor is the Jimbo forgery on your user page. Nor is the adversarial stance. Try to get along and cooperate with other editors instead of editing with such a confrontational style. That would be good all around.
Also, I gather you've seen this sort of thing before and it usually goes one of two ways: You tone it down and become a respected, constructive editor who helps the project. You end up in fights that draw a lot of keystrokes off the construction of the project, and end up blocked.
Wikipedia could really use your obvious energy and intelligence. Please use your powers for good instead of......hmmmmm.......ummmm....I don't know. I can't think of the word. Anyway, you get my point. If there's anything you need, just drop me a line. Happy editing. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hmm... I didn't know that my editing was causing conflicts. Firstly, even if a bot can't be made to change "an" to "a", and assuming "an" is just as acceptable as "a", is it legitimate for users to edit it manually to improve style as long as the article stays valid? Or is it considered a poor practice to edit the article if some feel that there is nothing wrong with the style being used?
I don't mean anything bad by the edit summaries.
Also, the "Jimbo Wales" thing is just a joke; most of it is inside the "vandalism" section on the userpage. It is sort-of an inside joke: In the past I've seen people put the line "Can I really edit here?" and Jimbo Wales's signature. I don't know how often this is still practiced. So I decided to mock this practice over the years by putting it in the limelight and repeating it as an obvious joke in a non-serious section of the userpage. For example, I would not forge anyone's signature in this talk page. Where it is in a serious section of my userpage, it is identified as a quote. In some cases I use it in a fake dialog where the fake "Jimbo Wales" keeps repeating the line and I respond to it -- it's not meant to be a "forgery". So you can edit the "vandalism" section of the userpage if you like to remove it, or let me know if doing that in the first place is considered a violation.
Let me know if I need to do anything differently or if anything I'm doing is a violation of the rules. -- Wykypydya ( talk) 17:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I am going to undo your edits today to change "an historic" to "a historic". This is a WP:ENGVAR issue; the style established in each article should be left as is. Several people have indicated this on the bot request page. So please desist from making this sort of change en masse in the future. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 20:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
I have denied your AWB request due to concerns about your proposal to use it for a controversial change ("an h..." --> "a h..."). Since you meet the minimum edit count for AWB, I would not object to your re-applying, provided you agreed not to use it for controversial changes, including the one you'd proposed, per WP:AWB#Rules of use. -- Philosopher Let us reason together. 12:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you recently moved Natoma to Natoma (opera). I realize this move was necessary for disambiguation purposes and have no problem with the move itself. However, the Natoma (opera) article is now an orphan because you did not change the incoming links when you changed the title. Please take the time to fix the articles which should go to the page on the opera and not the dab page. Thanks. 4meter4 ( talk) 22:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Alberto Lentini. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! -- LaraBot ( talk) 00:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Alberto Lentini has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite ( talk) 01:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Since you moved the article that used to be at Trustee and converted that title to a disambiguation page, please remember to WP:FIXDABLINKS; there are nearly 1,000 other Wikipedia articles that Special:Whatlinkshere/Trustee contain links to Trustee, all of which now need to be reviewed and retargeted to the correct destination. Thanks. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 14:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced synthesis or speculation to articles, as you did with this edit to A Scause for Applause. As indicated by WP:TVPLOT and and the notice at the top of the Sourth Park episode talk pages, editors cannot add material based on their personal belief or speculation. Secondary sources are needed for material that is analytical, interpretive or evaluative. Adding material based solely on an editor's viewing of a primary source, when that material is not explicitly stated in that primary source, is called synthesis, which is not permitted. Similar, speculation is prohibited by WP:CRYSTAL. Thank you. Nightscream ( talk) 20:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Since you changed the redirect that used to be at Trusty system to point to the disambiguation for Trustee, there are several pages with links that have yet to be updated. Shawn Is Here: Now in colors 06:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monitor (synchronization), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One-to-many ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monitor (synchronization), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomicity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jimoh Adams. Since you had some involvement with the Jimoh Adams redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Bold (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Bold (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wykypydya. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:Equation requested has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 18:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Wykypydya. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hygrargyrum. Since you had some involvement with the Hygrargyrum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Robot 2601:602:C700:2EB0:B5B5:6DC3:93C2:8163 ( talk) 23:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Medical Information Bureau 2017 No-Record Letter With Redactions.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)