|
Gosh, all those changes gave me a headache! No, seriously... thanks for making me aware of that user faking stats. :) Anyway, why did you remove also the 24 apps for Hearts of Lions? They're reported by both AC Milan official webiste and national-football-teams.com. Luxic ( talk) 15:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
He played in five matches and scored two goals at the 2009 African Youth Championship and played in seven matches at the two goals at the 2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup. He did not play in any of the qualification matches for the former tournament because he was still contemplating whether to represent France.
I would of appreciate you coming to me before removing the stats. Just because you thinks it "seems fake" doesn't mean it is. – Joao10Siamun ( talk) 00:29, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Abdul Moustapha Ouedraogo, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
02:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
Stephane Owona. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
02:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Christian Fabrice Okoua. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
Donald Duck (
talk)
03:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as
this edit you made to
User talk:Donald Duck. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Donald Duck (
talk)
17:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi there WRx2, VASCO from Portugal here,
I see that you have continued (as i) your struggles with User:Zombie433. Yes, he has returned to active, now editing anon, i found out about him at Baba Sule, and rolledback immediately. I have also started a discussion at WP:FOOTY.
Cheers, happy weekend - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 15:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Listen, I see you´re doing the annoying work to undo all the mess that User:Zombie344 or 433 or whatever, did in an enormous number of footy articles all around. I am aware of that. Also, you probably don´t know, Vasco does, that I was one of the few footy editors that ever got answers from that Zombie guy in some aproach over some dubious edits of his. The impression I got was that he was some kid, or perhaps he has some problems, anyway, I had much patience and good-will with him initially, but after a few attempts to explain him what he was doing wrong, my approaches started to be ignored, just as he did with most other editors that aproached him. Anyway, I´m telling you this just for you to know that I am familiarised with the kind of disruprion the guy did. I´m just not sure if you are familiarised with the kind of methodology the guy worked with. For exemple, he used to pick some source he finds in some website, and writes all from that source down in all the articles (he thinks) are related. What was the problem then, well, the problem was that if he finded a list of squads from matches from some african league with only surnames, he just suposed the surnames belonged to the ones with WP article, which ended up being ~90% of time wrong. Said this, his intention was good, and that is why initially I was patient with him, the problem was that he added 9 times in 10 wrong info in articles. However, 1 in 10 was right. Now, you must understand that not necessarily all his edits are allways wrong, and your edit summary is in part right, because 90% wrong info is fake, but in another sense it isn´t. Anyway, don´t fall into the temptation of considering every revert of your reverts of Zombie wrong. See my point? I was the one followed Vasco´s frustration all the way, and I was in exact same situation, and you doing this job is a blessing for WP, however, I am not sure you have this in the right perspective, meaning, Zombie doesn´t faked the stats on purpouse, but in some strange selfish desire to forcebly complete players careers that ended up with huge mess.
So, this is where we come to the cases where I revrted you, so I hope you don´t think I am defending Zombie, or something similar, its just that those were "my" sources and info on that particular article, and you may ocasionally find edits of Zombie that were good. So, thanks for your work, and I am here for anything you need. FkpCascais ( talk) 02:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Alassane Diomande has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mentoz86 (
talk)
20:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)