Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. No need to use Shri (any politeful addresses). Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Best of luck. Thank you!
PATH
SLOPU
09:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Wp4321!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
GirthSummit
(blether)
13:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
|
![]() |
You are somewhat sedulous with your article (Cellete). Take this cupcake.⠀⠀— ⠀Glosome⠀ 05:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC) |
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for
soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
DGG (
talk )
09:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Celette, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Celette and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Draft:Celette during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Worldbruce (
talk)
00:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Wp4321. If you want to stop your draft from being deleted, please discuss the matter at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Celette specifically. Doing it on other forums like requests for undeletion won't help your cause. Geolodus ( talk) 07:22, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Celette, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Wp4321. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
COI guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 16:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. – Athaenara ✉ 16:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wp4321. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Kevin (aka
L235 ·
t ·
c)
03:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC) |
Wp4321 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi, We created the article "Celette" only to understand the basics on how to make Wikipedia pages. It was not on the intention to promote or advertise a business. I understand the sole reason for being blocked. Sock puppetry and copyright violations will be corrected if I get this main account unblocked. Kindly unblock this account so that I can make the necessary changes in the article.
Decline reason:
We created the article "Celette" only to understand the basics on how to make Wikipedia pages - that seems utterly implausible given how tenaciously you lobbied for its inclusion. Yunshui 雲 水 07:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.