Welcome!
Hello, Wo.luren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -
Ahunt (
talk)
18:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foxit_PDF_Editor. Since you had some involvement with the Foxit_PDF_Editor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Affinemesh94464 ( talk) 07:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
The article Mi2 console has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wo.luren (
talk)
14:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed that you've been proposing the deletion of redirects. Why are you doing this? It makes the redirects fail to work, and most of the time, there's no reason to delete them. Please enlighten me. -- Tanner Swett ( talk) 18:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I am writing to you in the hope that you might have some expertise that I lack. I picked your name out at random from contributors to the Chinaarticle. If you would kindly take a look at the Further Reading section of this article, I could use your assistance. Specifically, there are a number of augthori's names that need to be alphabetized. I do not know which are surnames and which are first names. Thank you and happy editing. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 00:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Stan
Hi! I caught this edit summary: it says: "The detail for contact should not be here"
That is not correct, sir. That "detail for contact" (only the building name, if applicable, the floor on that building, if stated, the city name, and the country) should be there for every country. The non-notable details (exact address, driving directions) are included in citations WhisperToMe ( talk) 06:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles List of mobile phones with HD display, List of mobile phones with FWVGA display, and List of mobile phones with WVGA display are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The articles are being discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mobile phones with HD display until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
You are receiving this because you contributed to one of those articles. Votes are indicated by adding to the bottom of the
AfD page one of:
*'''Keep''' Your comment ~~~~
*'''Delete''' Your comment ~~~~
Some comment as to why you feel one way or the other is desirable. Your participation is encouraged.
Makyen (
talk)
23:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Wo.luren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wo.luren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Wo.luren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article IEEE Computational Intelligence Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable sub-group of notable organisation
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
Fayenatic
London
13:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Normchou. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
CoronaVac, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Per the latest update of the RS: "While the latest disclosure provides a clearer indication of the vaccine’s efficacy, it wasn’t a complete picture."
[1]
Normchou
💬
06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)