|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_pro_20051996_chrstuni_pro_en.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — CactusWriter | needles 10:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Institutions connected with the Holy See, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/institutions_connected/index.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — CactusWriter | needles 10:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
It appears you have been copy-pasting information from copyrighted websites into Wikipedia. I have rolled back another violation at Pontifical Council for the Laity. As you can see, I've have also placed tags on Roman Catholicism in the Bahamas, Roman Catholicism in Haiti, Institutions connected with the Holy See and Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. It is not permissible to take other people's writing and place it on Wikipedia without their expressed written consent to give up all their rights. Infringement of another's copyright is taken very seriously. Please read WP:Copyright violations for further info about this. If you have copy-pasted other info, please remove it or rewrite it using your own wording. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Regards. — CactusWriter | needles 10:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
The articles have been blanked again pending resolution of the matter. Please do not restore the text before verification has been supplied that this material is public domain. See Talk:Institutions connected with the Holy See for response to your comments and please contribute any additional information you may have there. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Willuconquer. The Vatican website holds copyright to all their information, so those additions you made needed to be deleted from the three articles. The good news is that the copy-pastes on the Roman Catholicism in the Bahamas and Roman Catholicism in Haiti come from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia which is in the public domain. I've removed the templates from your talk page and an administrator has removed them from the articles. (You are, of course, free to remove the other ones here as you wish). Please remember to add references to the sections you copied, and place this {{ catholic}} template at the bottom of the page which will note there is info in the article from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia. As far as copy-pasting is concerned, even if it is public domain, it is frowned upon per WP:Plagiarism guidelines. It is always best to use your own words. As well, the Catholic Encyclopedia is written from a Catholic viewpoint and the information can require alteration to provide a neutral POV. If you have further questions, feel free to ask. Good luck. — CactusWriter | needles 12:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Human rights in Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greenmaven ( talk) 03:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Gerhard Ludwig Müller may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirtimukha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Es ist vollbracht.
A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 02:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Some of the content you included in
Es ist vollbracht has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
18:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Willuconquer, I have moved the article you created to draft so you can improve it as it is not yet ready for mainspace but the subject looks like it could be notable. The specific problem was that the youtube source doesn't appear to be from a reliable channel and as such is not acceptable as a reference, two other sources appear to be dead already, other references do not seem to be specifically about the subject. The inline citations should be more specific and verify the content that it is specifically cited for. After you make improvements or if you disagree that there is a problem, you can submit it (using the button at the bottom of the AFC template that I've added to the top of the draft) and someone else will have a look. If you move it back to mainspace without going through the process, and if I'm right, it might be nominated for deletion by another new page reviewer. Regards! Usedtobecool TALK ✨ 05:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Usedtobecool TALK ✨ 04:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preah Ko Preah Keo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Violon Sneha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Lapablo (
talk)
09:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer,
Thank you for creating Violon Sneha.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add independent sources to show that the song meets notability guidelines for songs.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jmertel23}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Jmertel23 ( talk) 21:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Willuconquer!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --
RoySmith
(talk)
12:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello, Willuconquer
Thank you for creating St. Michael's Church, Sihanoukville.
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have called for more citations. The "History" section has many statements that are not supported by footnotes.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
☆☆☆ DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 13:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Song Senghorn".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you may have added
public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Décadas da Ásia. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
23:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Both here and even here. If I'm somehow mistaken, please let me know, eg via the email link on my user page. I edit The Signpost and am always looking for something unusual. Please see (in a bit) Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/In the media under "In brief". And I'll add "thank you" for everything you do. Peace. Smallbones( smalltalk) 20:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mengly J. Quach Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamroeun Vichea High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
signed, Iflaq (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Private schools in Cambodia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Chamroeun Vichea High School Official Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Official Logo of the American Intercon School in Cambodia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dharmasala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacred fire.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed that you've sometimes used text from other existing articles when creating new pages. When this is done, attribution to the source articles must be made to respect the Creative Commons licensing requirements. Please see the details in following template message, thanks. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 14:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
Paul_012 (
talk)
14:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 16:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Paññāsa Jātaka you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Supreme Court of Cambodia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
23:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baksei Chamkrong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampong Thom.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for writing and contributing about Cambodia Lydangin ( talk) 03:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Category:Cambodian words and phrases indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judiciary of Cambodia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Civil, Public ministry and Administrative act.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Legal history of Cambodia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into
Fall of Angkor. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Paul_012 ( talk) 06:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Moneytrees🏝️
(Talk)
17:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Today I noticed your creation of Battle of Pailin, which was copied from at least 15 of the cited sources. I deleted it as a copyright violation; you cannot copy from your sources, all text you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. You have received several warnings for copyright violations previously going back to 2009; it seems like you do not understand that you cannot copy from sources, so I have to block you. If you want to be unblocked, you must commit to no long copying from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 17:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Apart from that, don't you think the 30+ references quoted are within reasonable length?" I would say no, as looking at the deleted article, almost everything you copied from your sources are not portrayed as quotes; see MOS:QUOTE. For something to be considered a quote, there needs to be "" quotation marks around it, or it needs to be in a template such as blockquote. While you may have intended the content you copied over to be quotes, it looks like straight copying to an outside observer. Having an article made entirely up of quotes is discouraged anyways, see WP:QUOTEFARM.
I took a look at your progress on User:Willuconquer/rewrite, it's looking good so far. I'll note that the sentences "set an ambush that killed Haruyuki Takata, a Japanese policeman working for" and "Yasushi Akashi and the UNTAC Force Commander Lieutenant General John Sanderson were forced to turn around after trying to reach Pailin, which was a massive embarrassment for the United Nations at the time" are too similar to https://cne.wtf/2019/12/08/war-stories-from-the-northwest-79-94/ and should be rewritten. Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 18:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
no issues found with this edit Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 01:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for an excellent article on Khleang Moeung. Are you aware of Coedes's mention of this figure in his article "First Foundation of Phnom Penh"? It's one page 11, and is in the context of Ponhea Yat's foundation of Phnom Penh. Apparently Yat put a neak ta shrine under a fig tree on the riverbank outside Wat Unnalom; Coedes says the neak ta was named Neak Ta Prap, "dont il fit le Khlang Muong." In a footnote he says that the name Prap is obscure "even to Cambodians", and I wonder if the Pech name might be a distortion of this. He explains Khleang Muong as signifying protection of the kingdom. I also wonder if Norodom, when he built his interim palace next to Wat Unnalom, was influenced by this shrine. I remember a shrine in that location around 2002-2005, but it's long gone now. The article is here. 12:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, I was not aware of all that! I'll try to integrate it to the article as soon as I am no longer blocked. Willuconquer ( talk) 09:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer
Thank you for creating Grande Inscription d'Angkor.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer
Thank you for creating Num ansorm.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 17:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Appreciate your work on Wikipedia, and I have learned so much from you and acknowledge your contribution to Cambodian content. Looking forward to having another cup of coffee with you (mine is cold though) (: Lydangin ( talk) 06:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, when I was patrolling I came across the Heortology article. It appears that after you removed the redirect you added authoritative information with no citations. please consider returning to the article and adding the correct citations for each piece of new information. Bruxton ( talk) 20:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Khmer keyboard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ipom.fr/2019/07/02/disposition-du-clavier-wikipedia-2/ and https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1094201631&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unicode.org%2FL2%2FL2002%2F02073-cambodian.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – 333 -blue at 09:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Chen Zhi (businessman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Justanothersgwikieditor (
talk)
02:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Noem Chhunny, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer
Thank you for creating Trasak Paem.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer
Thank you for creating Law of Cambodia.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Willuconquer, A significant proportion of this article appears to be copied verbatim from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08729b.htm., a source that is clearly marked "Copyright © 2021 by New Advent LLC". I have removed the offending passages and marked the page as patrolled. I strongly suggest that you read Wikipedia's policies on this subject, including Wikimedia:Terms of Use and WP:CV. Gderrin ( talk) 10:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for creating Three Sundays of Commemoration. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Great article!!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creep Talk 17:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for creating Jean Desbois. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Netherzone ( talk) 02:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Liturgical lace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Chen Zhi (businessman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians in Phnom Penh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bearcat ( talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Hello, Willuconquer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Chen Zhi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Bearcat ( talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Please don't create categories at the form "20st-century". I see that you've attempted Category:20st-century Buddhist monks at least twice, but the ordinal form of the number 20 is 20th, not "20st", and the correct category Category:20th-century Buddhist monks already exists. Bearcat ( talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Sacred Heart into
Month of the Sacred Heart. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
12:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Austroasiatic carrying basket. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Sāstrā sleuk rith. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Num kreab. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, Willuconquer, and thank you for creating Aurelia Spinola. I detected it was translated from the French Aurelia Spinola. In order to clarify a translated article's attribution, it is necessary to state it is a translation in the first edit comment. It is also useful to include a "translated" template on the article's talk page. See Help:Translation for details. I've taken care of the attribution of Aurelia Spinola but you should bear this in mind for future translations. If you intend to translate more articles about women, you might be interested in joining WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Willuconquer. Thank you for your work on Hae Nang Maew. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice page! Have you considered suggesting it for WP:DYK?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Broc ( talk) 11:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Hae Nang Maew at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Munfarid1 (
talk)
21:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
On 14 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hae Nang Maew, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Thailand and Cambodia, cats are used in a procession to ask for rain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hae Nang Maew. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Hae Nang Maew), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Vorvong and Sorvong, would you be interested in a wikiproject on oral tradition? Kowal2701 ( talk) 13:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Moriwen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Henri Didon, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
Moriwen (
talk)
15:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)