Hello! I noted your corrections on the sources in this article, and in addition to saying thank you for what you have already done, I wanted to ask if you would do more?!
I would like to take this article to FA status, and in order to do that, every source needs to be fully accurate. It took me a year to find them in the first place and it's a lot for one person to recheck alone. I could really use the help. I would be grateful!
Jenhawk777 (
talk)
19:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello. Yes, I plan to finish the design of the sources, but at the moment I’m going to go to bed;) I live in the UTC+4 time zone. As soon as I wake up and get to the computer, I’ll continue. —
Werter1995 (
talk)
19:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Bless you! I have sent you a gazillion thank you's already, and it's not enough! I can't possibly thank you enough! I am so overwhelmingly grateful for all you have done. However do you find these? I would like to know how to do what you have done here. All I know to do is slog through them one by one, and since there are over 600, that's a long slog.
I do have one other question in addition to how you work your magic. This Dif [
[1]] has Shlomo Lambroza showing up in red, which I think means there is no link, am I correct? I didn't do anything because I wasn't sure, but does that mean that link should be removed?
So I am asleep while you are awake, but that just means I get to wake up to wonderful surprises! That could not be better! This is truly amazing. Thank you.
Jenhawk777 (
talk)
21:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)reply
One at a time then. WOW. I don't know exactly how it has happened, then, that we have ended up with red links - meaning those pages do not exist. I have had to remove them, but there were only about 6, so no big deal. I still think that this is a great addition that I am genuinely grateful for. Is it possible they are on other WP's not the English WP? That would have to be designated. Whatever happened with those few, this is great work. I never would have done this - so I'm glad you did! Thank you!
Jenhawk777 (
talk)
23:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The one time I applied for an FA, a reviewer removed them, and told me it is an "informal policy" because they just don't look professional and that's what FA has to look like.
Jenhawk777 (
talk)
08:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi, why did you
submitDraft:Maison+ directly after draftification when it was clearly going to be declined for the same reason? The only time I'm aware this is valid is if it is for
COI concerns. Did you mean just to add the template so the author could submit if they improved the article? If so then you should use {{
subst:AfC draft|username}} or you could use {{draft}}. Cheers
KylieTastic (
talk)
11:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi there, Werter1995, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to spend some of your editing time writing about women. If you feel inspired to create women's biographies, you'll find some useful guidance in our
Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--
Ipigott (
talk)
16:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Women in Red June 2024
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310