User talk:VolatileChemical |
---|
User page |
Email user
|
|
![]() Archives |
This takes me back. Blocking admin was Bobet. Sockpuppet was Robot ambulance. IP address is still 24.66.94.140. 01:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
unblock|IP address recently used by et cetera.
{{unblock|IP address recently used by a vandal}}
My IP address is 24.66.94.140. The vandal was User:24.66.94.140. Admin who blocked me was User:Kilo-Lima. I wasn't given an Autoblock number, probably because I wasn't blocked directly, just through my IP. Okay, me and Milkman1042 are the only people with that IP, and I never edit when I'm not logged in, so why can't the admins just community block User:24.66.94.140? 17:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Same info as before. Exactly the same. Okay, I'm not free. Does this mean I'll keep being blocked on and off for forever? 05:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Exactly the same as last time to the teeth. IP address is 24.66.94.140. Blocked by Ashibaka. Vandal is C-c-c-c. 'Twould seem I was unblocked after being blocked for his vandalism whilst he stayed blocked, and now I have been re-blocked for that same vadalism because his term is not complete. 22:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address used by a vandal}}
Man, this guy works fast. IP address is 24.66.94.140. Blocked by Ashibaka. Vandal is C-c-c-c. 04:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address used by a vandal}}
IP address is 24.66.94.140. Blocked by Andrew Norman. Vandal is C-c-c-c. 21:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by the same vandal who used my IP address every other time I got blocked}}
My IP address is still 24.66.94.140. The admin who blocked me is Kungfuadam. The user who did this vandalism is still User:24.66.94.140, who still shares my IP address. -- VolatileChemical 02:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by a vandal}}
My IP address is 24.66.94.140. The admin who blocked me is Drini. The user who did this vandalism is User:24.66.94.140, who shares my IP address. VolatileChemical 21:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
{{ unblock}}
Good? AmiDaniel ( talk) 22:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
I was autoblocked by InShaneee. The vandal who caused this block is C-c-c-c. I wasn't provided with an autoblockid. VolatileChemical 22:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by the aforementioned vandal}} Yup, it worked. And I'll be sure to include all that other info in the future. VolatileChemical 21:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by the same vandal}}
And again......... (may I suggest not using AOL) -- Tawker 05:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
VolatileChemical 00:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by user whose username was frozen}}
At least this guy was blocked indefinitely, which brings me one step closer to never having to do this again. VolatileChemical 21:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by a vandal}}
I'm sure whoever keeps unblocking me is as annoyed with this as I am, but come on! What is it about my IP zone that attracts vandals! Is anyone even paying attention anymore? -- VolatileChemical 01:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by a vandal}}
One more time! Everybody sing along now! IP address be 24.66.94.140. VolatileChemical 03:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|IP address recently used by a vandal}}
Oh, look, it's happened again. Hate to do this more than once, but I guess I just have an unlucky IP address. This time, it's because I share an address with User:U r a fag. What a clever name. My IP address is 24.66.94.140 (not to be confused with User:24.66.94.140). And yes, I know it's only a day and a half (for me, with time zones), but I'm getting annoyed. VolatileChemical
{{unblock}}
Finally. I've found a way to get my message across. I should be unblocked, because I am not the vandal. I only share an IP address with him. The real vandal is an un-logged-in version of this guy, not me! So unblock me! Please! Hoping someone cares, VolatileChemical 04:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC).
That IP was blocked for 1 week. I'll look it it. Moe ε 21:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Alright. Someone responded. Thanks, Moe υ. -- VolatileChemical 22:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Birch barlow.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your expansion of the Cleopatra (Clone High) article. I've been working on improving the Clone High articles, and I was not looking forward to how much work would be needed on the Cleo article. So thanks for the help! Good info too! -- Gpollock 04:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. You tagged Desert Punk as being a copyvio, but I can't find the text on the website you gave - can you point me to it so I can confirm the article should be deleted. Thanks. Kcordina Talk 12:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Cheers,It looks like only some bits of the profiles are taken and theres been a lot of changing done. I feel that the parts taken are small enough for it to be OK. Kcordina Talk 14:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC) That's cool. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't coming to close to the source. VolatileChemical 14:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Good stuff, all looks OK so have reverted to the article. Kcordina Talk 14:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kingston jamaica.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Seal belmopan.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi there; before I say anything else, I will say that I am aware of, and fully endorse and support, the Wiki policy as stated regarding merciless editing. And I know that I do not own the articles that I write. Having said that, what is wrong with the infoboxes on the Victorian-era battleships that you have tagged as unsatisfactory? As to the images, yes; if anyone has, and can add, images of these ships no-one will be more pleased than I.-- Anthony.bradbury 13:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
The article La Vie Boheme now has lyris with references inside, please check it out if you would like and edit it or revert it as you see fit. -- Cbrown1023 17:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I think I have cleared the autoblock. If you are still experencing any problem please drop me a message or use {{unblock}} again. -- WinHunter ( talk) 07:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Are you a member of WP:BLA you seem to know a fair bit about blackadder
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stewart crest.jpg. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for adding Template:Infobox Legislation to the appropriate infobox category, but please remember to place <noinclude></noinclude> tags around the category in order to avoid it being included on article pages. For more information on this see Category:Infobox templates. -- Safalra 20:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
| |
|
Welcome to the first issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. We would encourage all members to get more envolved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. Clamster5 18:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
| |
| |
|
Clamster5 22:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 01:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Picture_tutorial#Avoiding_image_.22stackups.22 -- Stbalbach 00:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except
where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
Great. So, the law applies unless it violates the First Law...but application of the law can violate the Third Law as it pleases?
VolatileChemical
17:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)