Hello Viwong731, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is
Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Robert J. Lillis to
WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:
The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
I highly recommend visiting
The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on
my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here.
~
Liancetalk18:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Robert J. Lillis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, Viwong731!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~
Liancetalk18:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:
All references provided are not independent of the subject nor are they secondary sources. Vast majority of the draft is still unsourced. See
WP:BLP for reqs.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Robert J. Lillis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The sourcing is better (although a few are not), but now you have a different problem -- notability, see
WP:NPROF (he is an academic). He has certainly made a strong start, but I am not convinced that he is there yet. His h-factors of 48 is decent, but by itself not high enough to qualify. Being a PI is an important step, but again not enough. Also his awards are not major enough. He needs "bigger" awards, the most obvious one he might get is APS Fellow, maybe someone will nominate him. Without major peer recognition he won't qualify, sorry.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Robert J. Lillis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.