![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Vermont. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - ... (up to 100) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States involvement in regime change. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rodrigo Duterte. Legobot ( talk) 04:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clinton Foundation. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
I find this very troubling that you are still warning editors way after the fact for edits they have already been warned for. The latest one I see is at 20:51, 6 November 2016 you gave AManInWikipedia an only warning for vandalism. There is no indication in the warning what edit you are warning them about and I can not figure it out. He was blocked for 31 hours at 20:26, 1 November 2016 for making Personal attacks or harassment, so he shouldn't need a warning for anything that occurred prior to the block. Since the block has expired he has made 1 edit and that still stands, no one reverted it, so that shouldn't be what you warned him about. What did you warn him for? I have reverted the warning, if you can justify what the warning is for and that he needs the warning you can reinstate the warning. -- GB fan 11:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You seem to like using the "only warning" level of the messages. I found where you gave another editor an "only warning", Aliya776. In this case she has made two edits, both were quickly reverted by Cluebot with warnings. Then without another edit you came in and gave an "only warning" Neither of the two edits were that bad that they needed an "only warning." The first one they made, might not even be vandalism, it might be an accurate assessment of the plot. The second one is just a little note left for the main character, not worthy of an "only warning". "Only warnings" should only be given out if there is blatant and serious vandalism to articles. You should really go back and read Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Jumping to an "only warning" for edits like these is biting the newcomers. We need to see how they react to the lower level warnings. I don't think you should be going behind and looking at edits that have already been reverted and warning editors for them. If you revert an edit, warn the editor if you feel it is appropriate, but if someone else reverts the edit, don't warn them. -- GB fan 17:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey there. I honestly don't know how to add rollback - I've been inactive a lot for the last couple of years, and mostly have just popped in to do some RC patrol when I've got some time to fill. I'd suggest continuing to do good work at vandal fighting for another little while and then request again. GB Fan made some good points in his comments to you, I thought; keep in mind that there's often some nuance when it comes to what counts as vandalism and not, and you'll get there in time. Sorry I can't be more of a help! Tony Fox (arf!) 20:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
I am at a loss on how to explain this to you. I don't dislike you, I can't dislike you as I don't know you. I have been evaluating your edits not you. I don't believe you have the experience to have more advanced permissions yet. You told Tony that the edits I am talking about are fine. You are warning editors that you shouldn't be warning. You are calling edits vandalism that are not vandalism. These are important things to know when you are fighting vandalism and I do not believe you have a good grasp of them. That is my opinion. -- GB fan 23:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
(UTC)