Hello, VederJuda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
~~~~
so others will know who left which comments.I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
-- Sango 123 17:54, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Hello VederJuda,
Here's an invitation to visit Wikipedia:Japanese Wikipedians' notice board. There, you can meet other Wikipedians of all nationalities working on articles related to Japan, including Samurai (thanks for helping with that). You'll find lists of new articles, projects, and resources such as Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles). Hope to see you there!
Best regards,
Fg2 01:21, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
The games you added to the list were already on there as Peter Jackson's King Kong and Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell 4. I know it's tricky with the miniscule amount of info we've got on our hands. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 20:31, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Why did you revert back to User:68.98.147.30's apparent meaningless contributions to this article? Ereinion 22:11, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, please don't make cut and paste moves. It destroys the page history. I've moved the page for you. There should be a tab at the top of every page (next to watch) saying "move" that allows you to do this. (If you don't have it, then it's probably not available to you because you're a new user or something like that.) Thanks, and keep on editing. Johnleemk | Talk 13:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
I dunno what it is with that vandal, but do you think a page protect is in order? if not, I guess a temporary block. Thunderbrand 20:48, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to The Price Is Right, the term "Showcase Showdown" does in fact refer to the segments involving the Big Wheel, while the endgame is known simply as "the Showcase." This can be confirmed several times in any given episode.
I don't mean to make a federal case of it, but this has always been a pet peeve of mine. TPIRFanSteve 17:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I assume this was an edit conflict? Please be more careful in future, I almost gave you the standard vandal warning. ;) -- JiFish( Talk/ Contrib) 00:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
If we could get your opinion on this that would be great, thanks. The general agreement seems to be that is should be "[Wii]" not "Revolution [Wii]". -- Steel359 16:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
I wanted the pattern of Nintendo console-related articles to remain "in-line"; considering the Wii's predecessor is labeled as " Nintendo GameCube", and the one before, " Nintendo 64", it seems fitting that the article would be moved to "Nintendo Wii".
I nominated the "Nintendo Wii" redirect page for speedy deletion because I wanted it removed so that Wii could be moved to it. You know that moving articles to titles that already exist is not allowed.
-- NicAgent 23:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering if you had any comments about what is going on at Talk:List of characters in the Star Fox series. As you probably know, many of the characters were merged into the page. Since you have not commented, I assumed that you have no complaints or concerns? Thunderbrand 14:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Wii ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Did X-Play review this game; if so, why doesn't the G4 website have the review there? -- VederJuda 20:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
nt - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey there VederJuda,
I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! - Digiwrld1 21:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
A "{{
prod}}" template has been added to the article
Item drop, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
BirgitteSB
16:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I am new so I need some advice Sonicriders 01:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Sonicriders
Could you take a look at the discussion of your addition to the Self-Experimentation article ? I like the idea, but would like to sharpen up the cases and possibly include a discussion of implications. DCDuring 16:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue20Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue6Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
The article New Game Plus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
L0b0t (
talk)
13:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:UsagiYojimboVol1Issue38Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue52Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue43Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)