Hi Unify ! Habe zuletzt den Germany Artikel bearbeitet und bin dabei auf eine nicht zufriedenstellende Grafik [1] gestoßen. Vielleicht hast Du Zeit & Interesse eine Neue zu kreieren. Hier die Spezifikationen: 1) Liniendiagramm mit Bevölkerungsdaten von 0 - 100.000.000 Einwohnern & einer Zeitachse von 1700 - 2007 2) 2 verschiedenfarbige Linien, eine für das Gebiet von 1913 & eine für das Gebiet von 1990 mit folgende Daten [2]. 3) Markierung der Anzahl der Nicht-Pass-Deutschen-Einwohner in einer dritten Farbe mit folgenden Daten: 1973 = 4.0 Millionen (West), 1985= 4.4 Mil. 1996= 7,3 Mil., 2005= 6.760.988 [3] & eine vierten Farbe für Einwohner nicht-deutscher Muttersprache mit diesen Daten: 15,3 Millionen in 2005 [4]. Das neue Diagramm wäre ein Riesenfortschritt. Freue mich über eine Antwort. Lear 21 ( talk) 21:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pretiosensaal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU≈ talk 01:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:StudioBabelsberg Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- FairuseBot ( talk) 01:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Unify, why don't you use the talk page before reverting? -- Ziko ( talk) 22:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:StudioBabelsberg Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
You are invited to comment on the following RfC:
Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?
-- Guy Macon ( talk) 22:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Unify. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Unify~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
03:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
20:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)