Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Brief, passing mentions in routine theatre reviews do not amount to significant (ie: detailed, in-depth) coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NACTOR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Daniel Millar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, Undercaker!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Paul W (
talk)
21:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Paul W Hi Paul. Thanks so much for the feedback here. I really appreciate it. I'm a total novice when it comes to creating a new page so any and all advice is very welcome. I will review this and resubmit as and when. Just to clarify, it is 'evidence for notability' that you are looking for with this kind of submission, is that right? Many thanks again.
Undercaker (
talk)
21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The key is verifiability (
WP:V) - statements about the subject, particularly in a biography of a living person, need "an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material". Many thanks.
Paul W (
talk)
16:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for June 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Oswald of East Anglia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Dane. Such links are
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.)
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Something in the Water and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This film draft does not have Reception information to establish
film notability . Please resubmit with reviews or other Reception information. (If the reviews have not yet been published since the release of the film, please wait for the reviews to be published, since the film appears to have been released.)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
@
Robert McClenon Thanks Robert. I appreciate you leaving a more detailed message. This is the first page about a film that I've created. If you can, are you able to recommend *specific* sources and references for film that aren't IMDB or reviews? I'm aware this film exists - I saw it today - so I'm a little lost as which websites and publications consitiute 'reliable' in Wikipedia's view. Thanks again for taking the time, Robert.
Undercaker (
talk)
21:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its
talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.