Hello Touth!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!
Kukini
Hi, Touth. ForestH2 is generally right. This talk page is not yours, really; it is here for other editors to use to talk to you. As such, you really shouldn't remove their comments unless you're going to archive them. However, I believe the comments you removed originally, and which ForestH2 is putting back, were simply quotations of your own comments that you had placed on other talk pages (they were copied here to provide context). I don't personally have a problem with you removing those quotations, but it's really not necessary.
As for the vandalism from anonymous users, don't worry about it. If they persist, put them up at
WP:AIV, or have your talk page semi-protected. However, those measures are only to be used if you can't keep up with reverting the vandalism. Otherwise, just revert the vandalism when you see it, and the rest of us will do the same if we see it here before you do. Thanks!
Powers01:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)reply
You are a repeat vandal on that article. When you vandalized it, others discussed it. You can't claim that just because you don't like people discussing this that it needs to be removed. Try editing in a more civil manner and you'll see less comments that displease you. For now, the others' comments are not yours to remove, so you'll just have to get over it. --
LGagnon01:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)reply
My advice to you: Please, Please, Please, Do not remove the someone's message in other user's page. It would be considered vandalism. If you demonstrate same behaviour from now, you will be blocked from editing.
*~Daniel~*☎04:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Touth, why do you want
The Legend of Zelda series article on that page? That page is only for lists, and that article is not a list. Why do you want it there so badly?
As for archiving: edit this page (your talk page). Select old sections (make sure to get them all) and CTRL+X (cut) them out of the page. At the top, put in a link to
User_talk:Touth/Archive01. Save the page, then click on the new link. CTRL+V (paste) the old sections into the new page and save it. Done! Make sure you only cut out old sections, not recent ones, and be sure to get an entire section (don't just take some of the comments from a particular section, take all of them).
Powers19:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)reply
I mean, edit your talk page (this page). You will see a BIG text box where you can type text, and it includes all of the text currently on your talk page. Use your mouse or keyboard to select the text you want to archive and use CTRL+X to cut the text out of this page. Add a link to
User talk:Touth/Archive01 at the top in place of the removed text. This is not a new username, it's a subpage of your talk page. Then edit that file (User talk:Touth/Archive01) and CTRL+V paste the removed text into that new article.
Powers21:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)reply
I'm also concerned about this edit:
[1]. Why did you re-add that paragraph that clearly doesn't belong? Furthermore, your edit summary for that edit is EXTREMELY similar to the edit summaries being used by
User:81.129.233.182 to add the same text. Is 81.129.233.182 your IP address?
Hi Touth. If you want the article to be created, either create it yourself, or post a request here:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games/Requests. Strewing redlinks around is not the best way to get an article created (even if it worked once before).
Now then, about your edit to
List of video games considered the worst ever. If you click this link:
[2], you will see an edit made by you that reinserts the offending text ("also known as GAYlo 2", etc.) with an edit summary "HAHAHAAAAA.... I wish i could stop laughing. (*still carries on laughing*)". This edit summary is very much in the same vein as the IP's edit summaries. Do you deny that you made this edit?
Powers21:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)reply
I understand. However, you must admit that it looks extremely suspicious. It's very odd to my eyes, and those of others, that you would both a) revert to the wrong version in the history and b) screw up the edit summary in such a way that matches the style and grammar of the vandal. Also, considering the IP made
this edit to LGagnon's talk page, a user with whom you've had disagreements in the past... well you can understand the problem, right?
Powers22:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Re: Userboxes
Hi, Touth. The way to get the userboxes in a single column is to use a
table. I just copied the format for mine from another location, so I copied my format to your page for you. I don't know quite how it works (I have some idea, but not enough that I could explain it well), but it does.
Powers23:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Deletions
I deleted the Pac-man request because it was AfD'd. If someone creates a stub list to make the article, it is a candidate for speedy deletion, which means that probably witin the hour of it bein created, it'l be gone again. I deleted the mortal combat one to be consistant. Honestly, I don't have a problem with either list, as long as it's an actual article that gets made. I recommend that if you "want these to exist", that you just go and create them. You don't need someone else to do it. --
PresN17:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)reply
List of computer and video games considered the worst ever
Hello Touth,
I am writing you because you are one of the Wikipedians who have editted the
List of computer and video games considered the worst ever. However, the way it is being done now, I believe doesn't work. I would like to invite you to take 2 minutes of your time and leave your thoughts on the
talk page.
hello jackSparrow, an anonymous user wants these two games which are
South Park Rally and
Robocop added to the list of worst games ever, to be honest i would love to dicuss those games for him or her but the problem is that i just dont have them games. if he or she desperately wants them there, what can i do? many thanks.
Touth20:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)reply
jackSparrow, i have just discussed what i thought about
South Park Rally. its not much but at least i discussed about it which might help. i have not yet discussed about
Robocop but i will soon ok? happy editing!
Touth21:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Hello Touth. It is not about having played the games yourself, because that would make it Original Research. But everyone can have a look at how the game is being accepted in the press and thus, if it is a good or a bad game. Thank you for your feedback!
JackSparrow Ninja20:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)reply
History of Mario
In regards to your question, I reverted your edit because the sentence involved states that Mario has been Nintendo's mascot for over 25 years. If the sentence did not have the word 'over' in it, then it would have been okay, I suppose. (Although the sentence might not look right then, you get what I'm saying?) -
DisasterKirby00:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)reply
One can't just assume that the original Donkey Kong arcade game debuted in early 1981 though, since apparently the exact release date is relatively unknown (even its
Wikipedia article doesn't say). -
DisasterKirby01:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Did you even read the article? Check the end of the seventh paragraph (second paragraph next to the promotional flier); it clearly states that the game officially went on sale in July 1981. -
DisasterKirby01:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)reply