Hi, I noticed you restored some vandalism that I reverted at Nafees; would you mind explaining why you did that? P,TO 19104 ( talk) ( contribs) 18:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shinyedit. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism that didn't seem very
civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Shiny
bonjour.
11:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
I would recommend filing one for this page here. Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 18:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Boppin'B, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
00:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
For some reason, you used an anti-vandalism tool in this edit on Bobby Moynihan, I am unsure why. As the edit you undid was a restoration of status quo on a matter that has discussion to the Talk page, it was a cromulent edit. Your edit summary gave no understandable reason why the edit was not constructive, it did not address the concerns raised in my edit summary in any way. If you feel that "voice actor" needs to be included as a separate item, you are free to join in on the discussion at Talk:Bobby Moynihan. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 19:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Mind telling me why you used a vandalism tool on my edits? Seem pl ez {{ ping}} me 10:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The portion removed is not fact based and has no place on the article.
Looks like cooler heads prevail as the correct change was made. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:D53E:C9FE:28B2:A218:BD24:6319 ( talk) 15:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am adding original support staff of rcb Bshjsn ( talk) 01:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, if an IP is vandalising after a recent block (especially, as in this case, when they resumed vandalising the very day their second block expired), there's no need to warn them. You can report them straight back to AIV, and feel free to ping the blocking admin in the report (especially if it's me). Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hey there! I noticed that you seemed to have copied my signature. Please read WP:SIGFORGE, as it's absolutely forbidden to copy someone else's signature. You should be able to come up with your own design (at least change the color), and not copy mine or anyone else's. Sorry but these are Wikipedia's rules and not mine. Thanks! :) CycloneYoris talk! 06:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)