Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Lyricast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Leisuretime and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Executive Order Clothing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
Draft:Executive Order Clothing while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. It appears that this draft is a combination of contributions from your registered account and an IP address. Have you been forgetting to log in? Please remember to log in before editing.Robert McClenon (
talk)
02:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bfpage was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the
general guideline on notability and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. What you can do: Add citations (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary
reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Executive Order Clothing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Tobo121,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bfpage |
leave a message13:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Lady-Comp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the
general guideline on notability and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. What you can do: Add citations (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary
reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Lady-Comp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:James Dante Wood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
SaveThatShow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's
talk page. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Dave Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
general guideline on notability and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:PermaFix Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Joshua Belanger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Lady-Comp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello, Tobo121. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and
frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{
request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see
WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's
terms of userequire disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Joel Mark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
general guideline on notability and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Sparta: War of Empires and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Orsto Ltd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Orsto Ltd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This must have more secondary sources: references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. The patents themselves say what it is claimed to do, not what it does, and the company links do not show it has ever been significant.
It especially needs some information about the extent to which this device has ever been used; product reviews from major publications are best.
It also needs to have the personal account of how the invention thought od the idea removed. Some of the hoistory section should be merged into the function.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:AirBody Dryer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Joshua Belanger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Max Levin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Stephen Christ (Young Originals) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Stephen Christ (Young Originals) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Louie La Vella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
VS Energy International Ukraine LLC, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's
talk page. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into
sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobo121, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Max Levin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's
talk page. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
I am blocked from editing, sorry if I unintentionally broke the
G11, but I never created the page "Orsto Ltd" because of which I am blocked, I created its draft, someone else moved it to main article space after which an admin blocked me, but I know it was not good enough to be in main article space that's why I created its draft, please unblock me I will follow all the rules in future if I have broken any Yours truly
Tobo121 (
talk)
06:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC).reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Brianhe (
talk)
02:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)reply
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Brianhe (
talk)
03:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)reply