Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron 32 01:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I was just looking into helping get the Taskforce on Pro Gaming started again. If you are interested in putting effort into this wikiproject, please post here Best Regards, NativeForeigner Talk/ Contribs 21:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The DYK project ( nominate) 06:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello Titan, just wanted to stop by and state that I have added an image to your recent nomination at DYK. Hope you don't mind :) Kindly Calmer Waters 01:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Done. Best, –
Juliancolton |
Talk
18:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Rafael de Izquierdo y Gutíerrez at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Specifically, I believe that the concerns raised would be resolved by including a citation to the off-line reference you mentioned, which would like be accepted in good faith. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
otherl
left
20:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 06:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for taking the time to weigh in on my RfA. It was successful, in that the community's wish not to grant me the tools at this time was honored. I'm taking all the comments as constructive feedback and hope to become more valuable to the project as a result; I've also discovered several new areas in which to work. Because debating the merits of a candidate can be taxing on the heart and brain, I offer this kitten as a low-allergen, low-stress token of my appreciation. -- otherl left 14:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
Hi Titan. Just have a question pertaining to your latest nomination at DYK... Thanks in advance Calmer Waters 17:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 06:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
G 196-3 at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Arctic
Night
14:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Shubinator ( talk) 00:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
HIP 79431 b at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha 18:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Please fix refs. 1,6,7 (inconsistent titles and web-links). Materialscientist ( talk) 12:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Messier 100 at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
19:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha 18:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Titan- thanks for improving Xeros- I really appreciate it. I am fairly new to wikipedia, and my articles will never be perfect. E2eamon ( talk) 14:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have granted autoreviewer rights on your account. I have taken a close look at the articles you have created and they show that you have a firm grasp on the policies pertaining to inline citations, references, verifiability, and NPOV. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information see Wikipedia:Autoreviewer, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. Please keep up the good work. Kindly Calmer Waters 02:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
[1] Lol :) ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ▒ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 04:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
FirstCarbon Solutions at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Thanks for the barnstar. I certainly appreciate all of the effort that you have been putting in to astronomy articles, and I am glad that I was able to be of assistance in improving at least one of them. James McBride ( talk) 06:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that the Viola Gentry has dipped below 1500 characters of prose so may need a little more expansion. (A sentence or two should do it.) Regards, -- Beloved Freak 13:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 19:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Can you clear up the issue at the DYK nomination for this? I agree with you that the person who approved it at DYK is a blocked sockpuppet account. But the article is legit and properly cited, so I'm not sure what to do now. Thanks! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
OK, thanks. If you are keeping tabs on it, I'd be grateful if you would send me a message when we get the "all clear". Bluebell was an important musical in its day, and I intended to do an article on it for a long time. Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 21:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this. All the best, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Okay, assuming "supernovae" is in fact the correct plural (and I believe this is a British/US spelling issue actually, since I've usually seen it as "supernovas") then "supernovae's" is still incorrect; shouldn't have the apostrophe-S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nibios ( talk • contribs) 00:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
— Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Good day. I made that image based on photos of screen captures. I even have the original soft copies with me. The website you cited isn't even an official website of ABS-CBN. Also, notice how the caption of that site is the same as in the wikipedia article. Please revoke the deletion as the picture is mine. I MADE that picture, spent time on it. ABS-CBN DOES NOT HAVE a photo THE SAME as that. They have a 3D version, but it is NOT THE SAME as that. Please revoke that deletion and put my photo back-up. LordBelly06 ( talk) 01:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
If you are not sure about an image, please just send it to FfD, don't tag it with a CSD. Those are intended for unquestionable violations. I assumed that you had found sources that this was definitely a violation. The image also needed a FfD tag on it. Thanks, MrKIA11 ( talk) 13:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
Congratulations are in order! You have reached the milestone of 25 DYK articles that you created or expanded. Nice astronomy work! Binksternet ( talk) 15:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks! -- TitanOne ( talk) 17:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 06:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
50P/Arend at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey mate! I noticed that you added GRB 090423 to the GA nominations page. I wanted to review it, since I have a keen interest in GRBs, but there wasn't a nomination template on the talk page. Did you just forget to add this or did you withdraw your nomination but forget to remove it from the nomination list? If you're still interested in taking it to GA, please add {{ GAN}} and I'll get started on reviewing it. Thanks! -- Cryptic C62 · Talk 18:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Calmer Waters 06:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
I have not seen any activity from you at GRB 090423 since I started the GA review. Please begin addressing my concerns soon, or I will be forced to fail the nomination. Thank you. -- Cryptic C62 · Talk 16:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
-- Cirt ( talk) 09:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey! I reviewed you. Sorry it took so long. Leave any comments or questions on my talk page. Homework2 Talk What I do! 02:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 20:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
|