Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Timrazzall", may not meet Wikipedia's
username policy because your recent edit to the
Tim Razzall, Baron Razzall article suggest that you may be the subject of that article.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
change of username by completing
this form, or you may simply
create a new account for editing. Thank you.
Hello, Timrazzall. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Tim Razzall, Baron Razzall, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Your edit to Jane Bonham Carter, Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury raises the same issue. Verbcatcher ( talk) 02:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I am going to restore the paragraphs you deleted concerning House of Lords expenses, but I will add a citation of a Guardian article and use the past tense about the controversial expenses claims, as they are presumably no longer being made. If you are 'the' Tim Razzell then I suggest you read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Dealing with articles about yourself. If you know of any mainstream media reports that add to this issue then please add a link to them at Talk:Tim Razzall, Baron Razzall, or put a note on my talk page. Verbcatcher ( talk) 01:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adotchar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Jane Bonham Carter, Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Adotchar|
reply here
11:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Jane Bonham Carter, Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Adotchar|
reply here
11:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Timrazzall. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Jane Bonham Carter, Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Adotchar| reply here 11:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timrazzall. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
19:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC) |