1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message . |
Hello, Im writing you as well since it's importent for me.. can you please have a look at the sources... below is a short summry since maybe due to the sources being in Hebrew it wasnt clear they are independent as well as many of them are significanty on Benjamin Freidenberg himself only... below are 5 examples, if you need more, I can add: 1. Hebrew University - one of the top 3 uni' in Israel, very independent 2. Yad Vashem - Please read about it, couldnt be more independent 3. globes - One of the top 3 news websites in Israel, also very independent 4. bezalel - ezalel Academy of Arts and Design Jerusalem 5. taufilmfest - this is Tel-Aviv International Student Film Festival, very major in Israel. Please have a look.. this is 2nd declined and I did add sources following the first. Thank you, Li-reg ( talk) 21:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC).
I shall remove bold lettering - thanks for the tip Nigel PG Dale 12:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
I have edited the draft for the article "Valentina Gomez" to follow your request. PeaRidge62 ( talk) 17:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for reviewing the draft. I believe I have enough reliable sources, albeit in Vietnamese, to consider this article to be notable, so how can I make my article more notable? May I also know where in the article might sound like advertising, to my knowledge most of the information under "Important Milestones" have been provided with references from a reputable source. All in all, I'm asking how I may improve on this article. Thanks a lot!
Shengyongchoo ( talk) 02:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi! My apologies if this is the wrong place to bring it - you recently rejected a draft, Draft:Collegiate Model United Nations Society, India, and the editor responsible promptly created an identical draft with a slightly different name, Draft:Collegiate Model United Nations Society. I don't think this hits the requirements for salting, but there also seems to be no reason to waste further AFC time and effort with a draft that isn't being improved and presumably cannot be improved. Is there somewhere I should take this for attention, or is bringing it to you a suitable response? Thanks and hope you're having a good day! StartGrammarTime ( talk) 08:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! You recently declined my submission at Draft:History of the Milwaukee Bucks. I understand that a similar topic exists in the full Milwaukee Bucks article, but is there any way I could extend this article so it meets Wikipedia guidelines? If not, I will abandon the draft, and try and add necessary citations to the full article. Also, other team history articles exist with less detail and less citations, so should those be merged as well?
Thanks, Awhellnawr123214 ( talk) 23:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
I have attached all the available sources on this notable figure. Any suggestions how I can improve to make it published. Rrpriyam ( talk) 11:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for paring it down. I felt it was going no further, but that I believed him to be notable. The community is always better than those in any way involved with an article. I believe him to be the correct side of the border, with some of the article showing that 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the page I created is a general election contender in the race to replace Adam Schiff in Congress. How is this not a qualification for coverage when his opponent has coverage? He is only given passing mentions in articles because it is presumed he will not win, however, it was presumed he would not win the Primary election, which he did, against 15 other candidates. Multiple news sources were provided, local and national (LA Times, New York Times, Fox News, Yahoo) detailing the fact that this guy came out of nowhere and could now represent Hollywood, West Hollywood, Burbank, Beverly Hills, and more in Congress. Close to 30 sources were provided, and all were reliable and secondary, and independent of the subject. In the interest of fairness, and transparency, shouldn't both candidates in elections have pages people can come to in order to assess their worthiness?
Zengoldenstate (
talk) 17:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Clare Nassanga ( talk) 06:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Theroadislong,
I have edited the introduction in the article Draft:Aziz Amoura to be more neutral toned according to your comment. I would be grateful if you can point out any other sections of the article that require further editing to sound more dry/neutral. Would appreciate your advice, thanks. JoHisAmm20 ( talk) 15:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I've made significant improvements to the page Draft:Jason Pine, rewriting the article in a neutral tone and including proper references.
Thank you for checking it again. Artistic Research ( talk) 19:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
You have incorrectly restored a label. Things have been clarified in the talk page. Please cancel that tag. /info/en/?search=Talk:Maria-Ana_Tupan 2A02:2F08:EB08:8B00:E59A:F0E:D9BA:A532 ( talk) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Karin van der Laag played the LEAD role of MAGGIE WEBSTER in Isidingo for 12 years for SABC 3 under ENDEMOL the biggest television producer in the country.
Please google TV SA and IMDB and please look at every title sequence from 1998 til 2010 to see who is featured and who bills as lead actors before making the assertion that Karin van der Laag was one of the small parts in Isidingo.
Do your research, esteemed editor Karinvanderlaag ( talk) 11:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey, i have made a draft of Draft:Aamir_Naik with reliable sources of Indian news Media, so hiw can yiu clearly say it is not suitable. Please check carefully its about an actor who done many roles in Bollywood films Kamarrrr ( talk) 06:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that I updated the draft page for Jason Pickleman with new citations and made the following clearer to establish notability:
Pickleman received awards from the The Society of Typographic Arts, the James Beard Foundation, the Museum of Contemporary Photography, and others.
He received features from Atlas Obscura, Chicago magazine, Chicago Gallery News, Chicago Sun-Times, Chicago Tribune, DNAinfo Chicago, Hyperallergic, Newcity, the New York Times, and Time Out Chicago.
And has work included in significant collections such as the Art Institute of Chicago, Columbia College Chicago, and theNate.
Thanks for your work! Archndesign ( talk) 02:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not revert maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maria-Ana Tupan. If you violate the revert rule, you break the wikipedia rules. Any user without a conflict of interest may remove a maintenance template if the issue has been resolved by someone else. You can ask an administrator about this aspect.
Draft:Sajad Hussain Malik (Volleyball) is ready for article, please check if there is any mistake Kamarrrr ( talk) 05:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hey there! Reaching out because you rejected my draft a while back and then made a a comment on it last month about the sourcing. Since then I reviewed all of the sourcing very thoroughly, made necessary edits, and took out the IMDB source completely. It's been several months since re-submission, are you able to take a look? Maybe even feedback so that it goes through for sure next time around. Livvin1 ( talk) 20:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! You said that the article was "blatant promotion" and I would like some advice on how to write an article that does not fall under the qualifications of "blatant promotion" if that is possible. Testinganaccount1 and I are just interns working on this project and we would really appreciate advice on how to build this article in a fair and balanced way. Phoenix219 ( talk) 21:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I left a message on Phillip Jeong article as follows;
The article has a Notability tag now. I saw some fierce discussions on similar issues in other articles. He has three albums with Universal Music (Decca): a participation album, Feel in Duo album, and a full album as Miraclass. I was going to write a separate article for Miraclass and therefore excluded Jeong's work with the group from his own article. Would elaborating on his group activities help address the notability issue? The crossover market in Korea is substantial, and many singers from the TV program Phantom Singer are recruited as musical actors in Korea. The stage musical market size is comparable to the so-called K-pop market, at about 25% of that of Broadway. Two of the Miraclass members are prominent figures in the Korean musical market. While these points may not directly prove his notability, consider that he has three Decca albums and performs in Hong Kong, which is outside Korea.
Please let me know what to do. Rosuacamus ( talk) 12:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you have done some really good work on keeping paid promotion (potentially disruptive) editors on the Piece by Piece (2024 film) page from blatantly promoting the company which they are interning for. Thank you for this. Something similar is happening with The Lego Movie (franchise) page, where an IP editor is claiming (numerous times) that the franchise which Warner Bros. Pictures separately owns is the same as Universal's upcoming movie biopic which we've been editing, and a (planned) one. Sources indicate that this is not the case and that Universal is using its own characters for the planned film, and that Piece by Piece does not exist in the same continuity as the franchise.
Can you help in having The Lego Movie (franchise) protected for now? Thank you for your work on this subject as a whole. I hope we get to interact on Wikipedia much more! With much love, BarntToust ( talk) 17:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Theroadislong, I noticed that you have marked my above-mentioned works as too promotional and deleted some passages. Probably not least because they are paid entries, which I have declared on my user page. I have tried to use sober, factual language in the articles, to provide sufficient sources (although some facts cannot be found in independent sources, but only in the business report or on the website of the described institution itself) and, at least for the entries on Martino Poggio and Swiss Nanoscience Institute, to use the “articles for creation” process (which I was not yet familiar with for Anaxam) to ensure that the entries meet the requirements. In the case of the Anaxam article, I had just discussed it a few days earlier with another admin who had flagged the article and confirmed to me that, on closer inspection, it was OK after all. I will be able to provide some further independent sources, as this deficit was critiziced on the German entry as well and I was able to find some more appropriate sources. What else can I do to meet your requirements? Or is that not possible as a paid user? -- J. Berndorff ( talk) 12:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already! |
Maliner ( talk) 15:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)