Hello admins, I just checked my account and it has been blocked. And just to be very real, i am very sad. Because i have my only one account. I would like to point out my concern in following points.
1) I had raised a request for change of gross inaccurate information quoted on wikipedia, and for that matter i had made wikipedia account, now for that change i had cited official documents, books, government links. And I haven’t had received any single reply about my sources. And then on another day i had posted that same message again for changes with better sources. Because i was not getting any replies.
2) Now, i see there has been concern that i am somehow linked with two other persons, who are also demanding kind of same edits, rather they just copied my message and posted. So let me clear admins, I don’t know them in real life, but them copying is simply they thought o raising request from there account as an add on.
3) Thirdly the information is wrong, so it is painful that such information is preached widely to create wrong perception about a community, which is having around 5 crore population. And that too after having solid evidences, wrong information is showed to malign a communities social status.
Again, reiterating Admins, i am not linked with any of those two people, and i had to go on youtube to learn how to raise request, because otherwise i was not even able to reply to the people who have blocked my IP for no reason.
Welcome!
Hello, TheRealAnalysis!
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Getting Started
Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started.
Hello TheRealAnalysis! Your additions to
List of battles of Rajasthan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper
paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create
copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see
Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to
verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not
original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
Fair use images must meet all ten of the
non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the
public domain (PD) or under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also
Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be
blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Special:Diff/1155098293 was copied from
[1] Thank you.
Doug Wellertalk11:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)reply