Publish private emails without permission again like you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions and you'll find yourself blocked, for a very considerable period of time. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 13:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Per a motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:
Having considered all the requests for amendment and requests for clarification submitted following the decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking, the Arbitration Committee decides as follows:
- (1) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is topic-banned from editing or discussing "style and editing guidelines" (or similar wording) are modified by replacing these words with the words "style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates";
- (2) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is "prohibited from reversion of changes which are principally stylistic, except where all style elements are prescribed in the applicable style guideline" are modified by replacing these words with the words "prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates";
- (3) All editors whose restrictions are being narrowed are reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in their editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient fashion;
- (4) Any party who believes the Date delinking decision should be further amended may file a new request for amendment. To allow time to evaluate the effect of the amendments already made, editors are asked to wait at least 30 days after this motion is passed before submitting any further amendment requests.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tiptoety talk 04:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your March 16, 2009 edit to Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, where you added a "citation needed" tag... let me quote one of the citations provided from that very same sentence:
“ | Capital Metro created StarTran to harmonize federal law requiring Capital Metro to continue collective bargaining, see Fed. Transit Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5300 et seq., with Texas law that prohibits governmental entities from entering collective bargaining agreements, see Tex. Code Ann. § 617.003 (Vernon 2004). | ” |
In other words, there already is a citation for the "Texas law prohibits collective bargaining by public employees" bit, despite your tagging to the contrary. As such, I've removed the "citation needed" tag TerraFrost ( talk) 18:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Tennis expert! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 871 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 19:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Please note the discussion here. HWV258 . 22:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/70.253.75.221 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 05:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/97.77.159.243 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 05:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tennis expert. Thank you. Ben Yes? 14:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Template:WTA Ranking Points Distribution 2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 15:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)