Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Talk:Nobel Oil Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Also see
WP:TPO. --
David Biddulph (
talk)
12:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Nobel Oil Group, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you. --
David Biddulph (
talk)
15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Swissfishpool! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC) |
Why did you leave an only warning notice here on 's talk page? He reverted your edit because you failed to explain it in the edit summary. His reversion was not an illegitimate one. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
as you see below David uses insulting word.
"stupid messages" - it is not neutral definitely.
not a problem. will try. if I am newcomer it doesn`t mean my msgs are stupid, otherwise why we are here.
also David launched investigation. Make your own conclusion
Your recent editing history at User talk:David Biddulph shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Stop repeatedly posting your stupid messages on my user talk page. Please read
WP:UP#CMT and
Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments. --
David Biddulph (
talk)
19:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)I have reverted your page move as it was done without any discussion and is not apparent either. If you want to move a page, please see the instructions at WP:RM#CM how to do it. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 17:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
move a page maliciously again, as you did at
Nobel Oil Group, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
01:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Explanation attempts for the Russian apartment bombings, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
02:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)