Hello, I'm
CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Rustam, Mardan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
15:49, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Mardan District into
Rustam, Mardan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
00:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Sulaiman.lodhi3, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 21:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining WikiProject Pakistan, and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) samee talk 14:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC) |
We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:
![]() |
The Pakistan Star | |
Thank you for joining WikiProject Pakistan, an open group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage on Pakistan-related topics. samee talk 13:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
this WikiAward was given to Sulaiman.lodhi3 by samee talk on 13:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC) |
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Sudhum Rustam, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
17:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Sudhum Rustam. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please note that social network source such as
facebook,
twitter,
instagram,
imbd, blog and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as
The Guardian,
Sydney Morning Herald,
CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example,
Random House or
Cambridge University Press). Pls see
CASSIOPEIA( talk) 17:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Sudhum Rustam. Facebook is not a reliable source. - pls see independent reliable source -
WP:RS
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
18:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I am an educated resident of Sudhum Rustam . I am aware of what are the policies of wikipedia. I have pulled the data from well reputed websites, books and personal visits to the places which I have mentioned. The article Sudhum Rustam was in very poor condition when I started contributions to this article. I am going to reference it. I have already started referring it. But suppose you have not checked it. Let me familiarize people with my area. Please let me finish what I started. Regards
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on InfoSkye, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella Velella Talk 00:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sulaiman.lodhi3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate.
I note that the source I identified does not appear to be the original source let's discuss if the source of your material is actually a properly licensed reference.
S Philbrick (Talk) 13:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)