Ebenezer (1997 TV) I have deleted your article at Ebenezer (1997 TV) because it's a copy of http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00008G8CT/102-9910219-5257721?v=glance&n=404272. Please don't copy and paste material from other locations. If you want to rewrite it in your own words, please do so. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Whether you are the person who wrote the amazon review is of no consequence, since the amazon information is copyrighted to amazon and we cannot use it. Even if you were the person who wrote it, you did not say so anywhere and release the information under the GFDL, therefore we cannot use it. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Trezjr"
If you bother to look, you'd see I WROTE the amazon.com piece--and it wasn't an exact copy that was posted here.
If you don't want contributions say so.
You could have spoken to me before you go deleting.
trezjr 21:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
If you contacted me first, I could have removed the Amazon piece--and it wasn't a rip-off.
If you checked the time stamps, you would have seen the article was written BEFORE the Amazon piece was posted.
trezjr 21:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Trezjr"
THANKS, so much!!!
trezjr 21:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Is there a URL you can give me for this??? I am just looping around in circles trying to find the right page to talk.
Thanks.
trezjr 22:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the support for speedy deleting this article. Now, are you thinking about deleting the Montecasino images? -- Bigtop ( customer service - thank you for your cooperation.) 21:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello Stifle/Archive 0706a, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. In MONGO's RfC you wrote, "Pokipsy76 almost certainly deserved to be blocked" and several other people have expressed similar sentiments... but I can't see any basis for it. Can you explain why you think Pokipsy76 should have been blocked for [1] & [2]? To me they don't seem to be excessive POV (indeed, "Some disagree" is more neutral POV than "Some conspiracy theorists disagree"), two reverts is not significant edit warring, and the other complaints MONGO brought in after the fact were all similarly minor content disagreements from 3+ weeks earlier on entirely different issues. So far as I can see there was no justification whatsoever for that block even if MONGO hadn't been the one to make it. Yet there seems to be near universal agreement to the contrary, so I'm hoping someone can explain it to me. What exactly did Pokipsy76 do that was blockworthy? The reason stated at the time, that he reverted an admin, really doesn't work for me. -- CBD 12:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I have been trying to delete the site all day as i did not mean to have it published but do not know how. If I can figure it out I will. I will welcome any suggestion you have. Thanks. Vanessa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vanessabu ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC).
sorry i guess I am still new to wikipedia. I just thought that the article was not important.
sorry
Disputed
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DiSpUtEd OnE ( talk • contribs) 21:44, 3 July 2006.
![]() |
Thank you!
Thank you, Stifle, for your support in my RfA. I appreciate your trust and support, and I will do my best to further help this great encyclopædia and community of ours. If there is anything that you feel I can do to help, please let me know. -- Avi 01:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
Dear Stifle, well, since you are a Wikipedian administrator, I thought i'd ask you some stuff i'm not really sure about.
Is there something wrong with this image I uploaded? It was on the page of actress Shriya Saran. I'm not really sure you see but User Yamla has constant problems with the fair-use rationale's that I've provided. Could you please just um, look at the information i've provided at the picture's page and correct me if I'm wrong?
Sorry if i'm troubling you, as you can see, I'm new to wikipedia. So i'm not really sure about everything I do here. I'd really appreciated it if you helped me with this. Thank You. 218.111.16.215 07:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC) (probably from User:Xena4441 having forgotten to log in.
Hello, Stifle.
I have been having issues with
User:Nokilli's deletion of warnings from his talk page. This user seems to have a very specific anti-circumcision bias, which compels him to constantly remove sourced information, written in a neutral tone, with borderline child pornagraphy styled prose. I will be spending some time over the next few days putting together the diffs in case needs escalation, but, as a neutral administrator, I am requesting if you could please take a look at his editing of his talk page here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3ANokilli&diff=62074097&oldid=62061788
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3ANokilli&diff=62131619&oldid=62116114 (including comment)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3ANokilli&diff=62143116&oldid=62138391 (including obvious personal attack in last line)
And let me know what can be done. I am loathe to take further action, as I want to prevent any appearances of personal bias. This user has violated WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, WP:POV, and WP:3RR on numerous occasions. Thank you -- Avi 12:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. As a basically brand-new admin, I want to make sure that I am following protocol to the extreme, as not to give false impressions. I appreciate your time and advice. Thanks! -- Avi 14:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
re: Speedy deletion, thanks for the advice. I could have deleted it myself but I thought it better to let an admin who has experiance in this area look at it, rather than cause any disharmony over the use of admin powers. I have now added my opinion to the AfD entry you created. -- Philip Baird Shearer 15:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Dear stifle this is a polite notice but the article I have submited to wikipedia is not nonsence because the micronation REALLY exists. PLEASE!!! have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronations and you will see that this article is not at all nonsence but instead very serious. Here is the discription of a micronatio: "Micronations – sometimes also referred to as cybernations, fantasy countries, model countries, and new country projects – are entities that resemble independent nations or states, but which are unrecognized by them, and for the most part exist only on paper, on the Internet, or in the minds of their creators.
Micronations also differ from secession and self-determination movements in that they are largely viewed as being eccentric and ephemeral in nature, and are often created and maintained by a single person or family group.
Some micronations have managed to extend some of their operations into the physical world by issuing coins, flags, postage stamps, passports, medals and other items. Such trappings of "real" sovereign states are created as a way of seeking to legitimize the micronations that produce them."
you quoted:
"Nonsense Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to KDM of Northway. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)"
I hope you will now understand what my article is about.
Yours sincerely Kentykentkenton
Is it really necessary to inform the uploader? The tag says "may" so I thought it wasn't needed and many of the uploaders haven't edited in quite a while anyway. -- Fritz S. ( Talk) 15:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Stifle, I was wondering about the removal of this image you made today. I was under the impression that you had deleted it for some reason, possibly copyvio. However on further investigation, I found that the image is still with us. Could you fill me in please? Thanks. Ste4k 16:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Stifle. "non-notable webgroup" sounds like criterion A7 to me. It also qualifies under A1, and when the tag was added, arguably A3. Could you delete aFreeWorld please? JPD ( talk) 12:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Stifle. Regarding your comment on my 3rr report ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:AdilBaguirov_reported_by_User:TigranTheGreat_.28Result:_Protected.29), you said #1 and #4 were not reverts. #1 ( [3]) reverts to this: [4]. #4 ( [5]) reverts to this: [6]. The paragraph being reverted to is the one that says Nagorno-Karabakh is de jure a region of Azerbaijan. Regardless of protection, the 3rr rule is still violated by user Adil.-- TigranTheGreat 21:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, do you think I deserve your apology for accusing me of incivility and of disrupting the Wikipedia [7] ? If you do I'd appreciate it, otherwise I'd like to know what in my behaviour was uncivil. Thanks. -- Lysy talk 21:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Stifle, I was hoping you can place the article, the Armenian Genocide to be protected because of a recent war reverting. Several users have committed the 3RR rule 2 times over a very minor issue and I was hoping you can assess the situation and carry out whatever needs to be done as you see fit. Thank you.-- MarshallBagramyan 21:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Is that the British spelling or something? Λυδ α cιτγ 03:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi there: OK, point taken. But I note that a proposal for deletion message is still affixed to the article, and as it's a rubbish article that's fine by me. Apologies for not choosing correct procedural format.-- Anthony.bradbury 23:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
On an article such as this, if I feel that deletion is appropriate, should I then hang on to it a {{ dated prod}} flag?-- Anthony.bradbury 00:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
The move of Dhanush ( [8]) is very unnecessary, and IMO, much worse than Joseph Vijay because practically nobody knows him by this name. I have also added a comment in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indian_cinema#Naming_conventions because I am not very active at the moment and may not be around to reply quickly. Tintin ( talk) 06:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, it may be extremely stupid of me to do this, but I think the ruling for or against me in my supposed 3RR Violation should be fair, as to not cause any controversy later.
UCRGrad filed a 3RR Violation against me here [9], which was dismissed by you on the grounds that my first revert was the same edit as the previous version reverted to. However, I believe that UCRGrad mistakenly linked the same thing twice, and actually meant to link this [10] as the previous version reveted to. This would make the first revert against me valid.
However, my comments on the 3RR Violation page still stand. I still believe that my second revert wasn't actually a revert, as I changed the material in the article from "...as a special report revealed that in 2000, the entire University of California failed in its duty to compile detailed crime statistics..." to "...as a special report revealed that in 2000, UCR, as well as the rest of the University of California, failed in its duty to compile detailed crime statistics..." in order to try to reach a compromise with UCRGrad. Just for reference, his preferred version is "...as a special report revealed that in 2000, UCR failed in its duty to compile detailed crime statistics...".
If my second edit does indeed reflect a revert, then feel free to change your ruling on the case and impose a ban on me on the UCRiverside article. I am, however, hoping that my honesty in the matter does count for something. -- WHS 10:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Please undelete Lion Ambassadors; it had the {{ hangon}} tag and had an open AFD. Thanks. -- Spangineer [es] (háblame) 12:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi. With the image above, I had listed that as a speedy deletion candidate, since I had uploaded a replacement for it: IMage:BBC Breakfast.png. Therefore the image you have notified me about can be deleted as such. Thanks for letting me know though. :) Wikiwoohoo 14:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
and don't know how to know. I brought it from www.arij.org. The bottom of the page says "all rights reserved". Robin Hood 1212 16:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed earlier that you took the speedy deletion tag (added by another user) off Ozark_Games. Since the article is clearly a vanity page created by the owners of a "company" with no products and little more than a non-functioning website, I put a prod tag on it.
The original creator of the page removed my prod tag, but also removed the entire content of the article. The deletion guidelines are a bit unclear on a situation like this; I wouldn't call this action a dispute of the proposed deletion, but I'm not sure if the best course would be to renominate for speedy deletion, re-add the prod tag, or put it up for AfD. Geoffrey Spear 17:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Have you closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie's Revenge? I didn't see an official "This is closed" boxing and all at the page. Also, are redirects your advice for most of the songs at List of Phish songs? Do you think I should nominate List of Phish songs for deletion as well? Thanks! -- MOE.RON talk | done | doing 21:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
You may wish to check out Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't be lazy for some background info on the page creator's interactions with AfD, which I was involved with. Oddly enough, I came across this entirely by coincidence, as I was wondering what populated the Miscellany for deletion category and this was right up there. Small wiki, I suppose. — Mike ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
I placed a speedy-delete tag on this page (in another user's userspace) because I was responsible for its undeletion in the first place; it was on Content Review (from WP:DRV), and undeleted into its main contributor's userspace on my request. The content has now been saved elsewhere (both by me and by a user with the same username on another wiki), so I placed a speedy-delete tag on it. I just thought I'd explain the situation because speedying another user's subpage is quite unusual. -- ais523 11:02, 11 July 2006 ( U T C)
Please read my comments on the discussion page about your recent edit to the page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ethr ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC).