![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For suffering through vandalism on your userpages and continued determination in fighting vandalism. ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 07:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC) |
Hey Steve. I happened to notice your name on MBisanz's page, asking about admin coaching, while at the same time I've been commenting occasionally at Talk:Sovereign Grace Ministries. If you're hoping to get admin-related experience, the issues over at SGM would certainly be good practice for you! Though I've only skimmed the controversy there, it has the earmarks of the intractable problems that admins are often asked to deal with. Extra points if you can get those folks to agree on anything! It could wind up being escalated if no-one is willing to be reasonable. EdJohnston ( talk) 12:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Yep, I just downgraded it from Level 1 only a few minutes ago. If you think so, upgrade it again. :) Rudget . 14:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I hope you are not basing your assumptions on just one single website. Please see the following links:
[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. She is 112th in line of succession to the British throne [9]
Can you please amend your assumption quick and prompto! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.165.224.166 ( talk) 15:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not threaten an edit war, as you did with your hidden comment on List of television series canceled after one episode. If you are an admin, you already know that such a threat is doubly discouraged under Wikipedia guidelines and policies. If there is repeated removal of Viva Laughlin despite its been canceled on Australia's Nine network, I'd suggest punching up the writing to emphasize it and de-emphasize its three-episode run on CBS. B.Wind ( talk) 00:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean, precisely? I was making a request for the article to appear on the main page. How is that non-constructive? :-/ mike40033 ( talk) 03:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
No problems, glad to help. You've truly captivated the attention of some nimrods, haven't you? Redrocket ( talk) 05:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Slakr's Acetone Award For excellent effort in reverting vandalism, you are hereby awarded some acetone to help scrub out the toughest of attempts at turning articles to mush. Plus, if you ever need to get nail polish off, it'll help with that too. :P Thanks for helping out. =) - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 07:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC) |
Your NPWatcher application has been approved. Good luck with the extra tool. Rudget . 12:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Steve Crossin! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb talk 18:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I see you so many nights, tirelessly fighting vandals. If anyone deserves this, it's you. Casull 07:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
Hi, you reverted my edits at page "UltraStar" and said they were vandalism. But i just deleted wrong information cause UltraStar does not violate any gpl laws due to bass is a free-to-use lib for non commercial projects the source must not be provided. 84.60.164.154 ( talk) 12:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
You are right that it was reverted by another partoller but that was due i deleted without using the edit summary. The second time i used it but then it got reverted by you :). I´ll try again. Greets 84.60.164.154 ( talk) 12:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Outstanding job of countering vandalism!! - P|^|C ( talk) 12:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
What the heck is your problem.
Congratulations, Mr Revert Warrior. Good work, I guess! - 84.234.60.154 ( talk) 17:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I forget,
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Outstanding job of countering my edits!! -- 84.234.60.154 ( talk) 17:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
Because you people seem to love this sillyness. -- 84.234.60.154 ( talk) 17:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I've committed a WikiSin. I wrote a message to a friend on myspace and I added ~~~~ at the end of it. They were like wtf? -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 19:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I even tried to link with wiki brackets a few times, though I caught those. It's just so much more convenient than HTML. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 20:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
It is an online game. I don't think it's notable enough for inclusion but it definitely exists. George D. Watson (Dendodge). Talk Help 19:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
When the time comes yes, but this isnt going to be the normal format for a MedCab case in the beginning. Seddon69 ( talk) 01:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
You being mediator is fine. :) Nanobri ( talk) 02:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. THE KC ( talk) 03:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC).
I'm going to try to meet this request based on my best understanding of the degree to which people were involved, but others may disagree with me, so you might also ask User:Michael Safyan the same question. I would say that based on the volume of contributions over the last three months that the primary parties include him, me, User:Jaakobou, User:Timeshifter, User:Delad, User:Sm8900, and User:Gatoclass. Secondary parties are largely those who recently participated some heavily, some not, in the recent RfC, such as User:Nishidani, User:CasualObserver'48, User:Nickhh, User:Yahel Guhan, User:Ynhockey and User:IronDuke. I hope that helps some. Tiamut talk 03:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
This place sucks! There's nothing but censorship everywhere! What's a matter? Can't handle the truth? This place makes me sick, I'm leaving! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.68.207 ( talk) 03:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
You seem a very reasonable choice. Yes, you have my acceptance. Skele ( talk) 06:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Steve, can you please have a look at the new article Lucky Ashley. There is one editor. The article is badly written and I tagged it twice but the editor deleted boths tags. I issued a General note first time round but this time I'm wondering how to procede. Have a look at the article and see what you think. Maybe another editor tagging the article might make them change it. Have a look and see for yourself. Olly150 12:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
The ideas contained in the Traditional Accounts are totally Original Research and pushes a very racial propaganda that exists in Tamil Nadu. There is absolutely no citation to verify the malicious accusations of Aryan destruction of harmonious Dravidian society (much less the existence of distinct racial entities). Please revert your change and place it as it was, or leave a tag on the Topic that alerts readers of the Lack of Neutrality, the Original Research, and Controversial Opinions.
- Suraj
Thank you for the OR notification - but shouldn't blantantly malicious/racist OR be removed to maintain the integrity of the site?
I'm too lazy; but thank you for the OR notification - at the very least it'll give a heads up to people working on the Thiruvalluvar article to clean things up. It's really rudimentary considering the wealth of information online regarding the Sage.
216.252.71.146 ( talk) 13:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Suraj
Can we call time out here and take it to the talk page? What is the objection to User:Aaronjhill's material ? Jheald ( talk) 12:23, 18 March 2008 (UTC)