Archives: |
|
|
Hi Stan. Thanks for your help with this article. Could you take a look at it? It seems to be creeping back to what it was. I really don't want to come back to Project Scientology. Thanks. Steve Dufour 21:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
It's so good I'm stealing it for this page:
http://www.daisy.freeserve.co.uk/stolgy_5.htm
--
Hartley Patterson
13:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
User:Fahrenheit451 has requested mediation regarding the following:
Sterling Management Systems Dispute
and your participation has been requested by the parties. I will be the mediator of this dispute.
-- Leonmon 06:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Stan En, Misou has been disruptive of the mediation, Ibeme has evaded answering any questions about his connection to Sterling Management Systems and is clearly not participating in good faith. I have requested that Leonmon conclude the informal mediation as it cannot progress to a resolution under these circumstances.-- Fahrenheit451 ( talk) 19:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Stan - You will be missed. -- Ibeme ( talk) 00:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I have gotten Free_Zone_(Scientology) unprotected and did some editing in accordance with our discussion. Take a look and let me know.-- Fahrenheit451 ( talk) 23:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
In addition to the thanks on my own talk I have to ask, how long did you spend on that? Looks great. Durova Charge! 23:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Read before haphazardly reverting my edits as it it is mere vandalism. -- Ezeu 19:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi und grüß dich!. As I'm sure you have seen from the edit history of Zimbabwe I have made many alterations to the GA criteria to Zimbabwe alone and have a methodical way of doing things by now. Thanks for your help. Any changes you make please make sure you add {{
tick}}, {{
cross}} or {{
working}} to the comments on the Talk page so that I know what has been done and what still needs to be done (as you have already been doing). Also, please when making changes double check your English so we don't get picked up on errors come next review. So far I havn't seen any mistakes on the Zimbabwe page but there were a couple in the message you left me on my talk page. Once again it is nice collaborating with you. Many thanks.
Mangwanani
20:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I figured it'd be better to answer here than on the actual talk page, as my feelings/opinion of Schwarz isn't actually what's going into the article so discussing it there seems inappropriate.
I'm not angry at or trying to "attack" her. The simple fact is that some sources covered her quest for answers in which her legal status has been discussed by said source using her own words. (If the Tribune hadn't mentioned it, I wouldn't be adding it.)
We're not supposed to edit by "feelings", this guy pisses me off so I don't edit his article. I feel sorry for everyone involved with this woman's fate and don't edit that one either. If I felt strongly one way or another about Schwarz I wouldn't edit about her. Anynobody 05:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
It's really no biggie to me her article was deleted, if anything that makes things easier since her role within Scientology before she went nuts, her history on usenet and attempted Scientology deprogramming aren't necessary to include with what I happen to think is notable about her. (It actually eliminated the stuff I personally didn't think was notable, but for which there were sources thus forcing me to work those topics too.) Nor was I offended, had I been I'd of said so, I actually understand why you'd ask if I had something against her.
I'm not so much trying to justify my efforts as I am trying to explain them since there are people who do seem to hate her with a passion. My interest is actually in the government/law aspects of her saga. It illustrates several aspects and problems with the US federal government. It's amazing to me personally that the government would bend over backwards looking for non-existent information for one person who technically isn't supposed to be here, but if her name was Gianina Negro from Mexico they'd of probably deported her. (Schwarz means "black" in German, and Negro means "black" in Spanish.) Anynobody 02:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Relavence? See Lanmark Education Litigation, or the related page. 21st Century Democrats...case appearing in FED court. There's your source. Washington Post. -- Pax Arcane 23:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Arica Chile.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 12:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)