No, that's the revision I preferred, which keeps the kanzenban-sourced info and removes the line lacking citation.
Geoff B has made a minor edit since I posted to your talk page, though, as well as posting on the article's talk that he agrees with the revision you linked to. I think it'd be best if those changes were applied to the version he edited, rather than reverting, and I'll do so if there are no objections.
Hey Splatterhouse5, thanks for that post you put up about 70. A while ago, he became such a frequent nuisance to so many pages that I requested an edit filter be constructed to revert him, but it got bogged down in whether it could actually be done or not. Thankfully he's quite inept!
Geoff B (
talk)
18:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)reply