Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! SoulafHadad,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
jcc (
tea and biscuits)
20:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Declare any connection
Hello, SoulafHadad. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Draft:Game Power7, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see
WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see
WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's
content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see
WP:PAID).
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Still not enough significant major independent news; please focus with only major news and no press releases, interviews, company announcements or similar.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The given sources just do not show notability - many of them are
WP:PRIMARY, meaning that they were written or created by the company or people that are affiliated with them. One looks to be a press release, which will always be seen as a primary source regardless of where it was posted. Of the others, CinemaBlend is fine, but a little on the short side and not enough on its own to show enough notability to accept the article. I'm unsure about whether or not 2P would be seen as a RS on Wikipedia, especially as both links look to be press releases.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:
Improvements have been made but more are needed in a similar vein.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in
reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and
the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power 7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Game Power 7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Draft:Game Power 7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read
the guidelines on spam and
Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Legacypac (
talk)
15:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)reply