If you notice a Canadian political biography that needs to be updated, please make your request below. Please let me know what you feel needs a more balanced and professional update. Happy to try to help! ( talk) 06:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Kudos on edits or contributions you liked. ( talk) 06:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind fixing your signature? It should link to your user/talk page. You can do so at Special:Preferences. Thank you! 15 ( talk) 19:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sigma58! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading
File:Michael chan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Michael chan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq ( talk) 01:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao ( talk) 23:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Kinu
t/
c
00:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Sigma58 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not edit warring. @ Kinu please help. If anyone simply looks at my citations they will see that everything I have included is published by government, the public figures self published biography on several websites. Other users ficed my citations which I thanked them for. Unfortunetly, @ Amigao is undoing my revisions and engaging in war editing. The template I created deserves page protection. @ Amigao has not provided any valid grounds for why all my edits are being undone and has made no attempts to ensure content is relevant, not inflammatory or neutrally presented. @ Amigao has purposely reverted back to inflammatory content that was disproven and even subject to a lawsuit. @ Amigao reverted back to an unflattering image not relevant to the position the public figure had and not professional by any means. I made the page look substantially better and neutral. I asked they not include libel information that goes against Wiki policy's. I noticed this page had been historically vandalized and became progressively biased. For that reason I did in depth research and fixed it all. Unfortunetly I do not know how to use code in the sophisticated way that the people who are actually engaging in edit waring against my posts are acting. They also accused me of being paid when I am not, but I did seek consent and found the image in an open source. Wiki is not supposed to be a tabloid and that is what @ Amigao turned that page into
Decline reason:
What you're doing is the very definition of edit warring. Not a single article talk page edit from you. Content disagreements are not vandalism, and your accusations of libel constitute legal threats. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sigma58 01:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)