Ok, I was told that I was too harsh with the warning. I would have retracted it, but you have already deleted it. I did not mean harm, but it is wise to read WP:OR and obey it. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 00:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
I realize from your comments above that you aren't fluent in English. As such, it's not a good idea to keep reverting people who are fluent in English without trying to find out why they keep reverting you first.
In your edits here on the F-22, you confused two things that led to your errors.
"In April 1992, the second YF-22 crashed..."meant the second YF-22 to be built, not the second one to crash.
"The first F-22 crash occurred during takeoff at Nellis AFB on 20 December 2004"meant the first crash of a production F-22, not including the previous YF-22 crash.
I realize English can be complicated, but you do yourself a disservice by not relying on people who are fluent in English to help explain. That doesn't mean we're always right, but we usually are when it comes to comprehending what is written. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 23:03, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I noticed that you added an extremely poor quality image supposedly of a Qaher-313 prototype to the IAIO Qaher-313 article. Just because other language Wikipedias use the image does not mean the image is better than nothing. The image was added to the articles on the other languages by a single user, M.k.m2003, so your statement "as you can see the picture has no problem by all people across the world except you. which makes 'you' a different person" is incorrect. All of those articles appear to go unedited for long periods of time, with the addition of the image being the last non-bot edit in most cases. It appears that "all people across the world" missed the addition of the image and did nothing about it. - ZLEA T\ C 12:27, 31 October 2019 //(UTC)@ ZLEA:@ Ahunt:
Please note that your recent comment above was not very civil. Wikipedia requires that contributors be civil to make collaborating to build the encyclopedia possible. In future please be more polite in your comments. Thank you. - Ahunt ( talk) 12:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at IAIO Qaher-313 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt ( talk) 12:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
19:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)== (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepehr.Sǎsǎni ( talk • contribs)