In addition, you are required by the
Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See
Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Thank you for the note. I did not perform and edits for purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting. My edits were largely to take information from the main portion of the document and place that same information in a text box. I tried very carefully not to add any new content to the page due to my COI.
Seanhearne001 (
talk)
15:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Many thanks for your reply. I've not reviewed those other articles carefully, but for the sake of transparency I've added a banner to their talk pages. -
Kj cheetham (
talk)
16:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Seanhearne001!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Vanderwaalforces (
talk)
17:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Voorts were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
For a Wikipedia article about an organization to be published, the company must be
notable. An organization is notable if it is has significant coverage in several independent, reliable sources. Under Wikipedia's guidelines: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable." Coverage of a company is
significant if the subject is covered in depth in the source; passing mentions and routine news stories are generally not significant.
Under Wikipedia's guidelines, sources that discuss only a part, product, or person associated with an organization is not significant with regard to the organization itself. "Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization."
The sources cited here do not significantly discuss the Center.
Please remove
external links from the body of the article. Also,
LinkedIn is generally not a reliable source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hi Seanhearne001! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Sean Hearne that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Kj cheetham (
talk)
15:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the information. I tried to make sure that none of the edits I made were of any substitutive impact due to the COI I have with this page.
Seanhearne001 (
talk)
16:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Hello, Seanhearne001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.