![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Sasata, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place{{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Doug.(
talk •
contribs)
18:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Interesting web page you have. I noticed one error on it.
The picture of Coprinellus micaceus is not that. The mushroom in the pic is close to Psathyrella gracilis.
http://healing-mushrooms.net/wp-content/uploads/image/Coprinellus_micaceus.jpg
Alan Rockefeller ( Talk - contribs) 01:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Template_talk:Did_you_know or how to graffiti the mainpage with cool articles. I have piggybacked and expanded Russula brevipes and Hydnellum so they qualify for a five-fold expansion. Always nice to get fungi on the mainpage :) Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 10:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thx Victuallers ( talk) 16:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 03:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Great work on expanding the aspartate carbamoyltransferase article! In case you haven't already seen this, check out the template filler tool. Given a PMID, you can quickly create a fully formatted {{ cite journal}} template that can be directly copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. Using this tool can save you a lot of work and insure that citations are displayed in a consistent way. Cheers. Boghog2( talk) 08:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 02:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Cirt ( talk) 06:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) ( talk) 00:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) ( talk) 11:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 05:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/985852.html
Growing gold, in fungal form
May 1, 2008 - haaretz.com
Perhaps you didn't see it yet. -- Panoramix303 ( talk) 19:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 00:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Fungi Barnstar | |
For eight DYKs and counting...and alot of sorely needed article expansion. Congrats. Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 04:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of
Calostoma at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Chamal
talk
11:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
01:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 13:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Victuallers ( talk) 02:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 02:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
One article that would be great to get up to GA or FA is fungus. Now I am a doctor not a mycologist, so I am sorely lacking on the wherewithal and technical side of things, but I think this would be great to work up. The other fungal expert is Peter G Werner, who may also help out. Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Bovista at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Article text is too short. Also, I think it would be better to do a hook that is specific to Bovista, not puffballs in general.
Orlady (
talk)
21:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 13:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 01:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 20:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
DYKBot ( talk) 22:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
DYKBot ( talk) 22:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 06:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 18:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 16:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 12:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 01:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia & mycology. When I see your moniker I always assume it is for the best when a change is made or vandalism is removed. For Psathyrella I removed the recent addition as I'll need to mold the concept a bit more - sorry about that. Heliocybe ( talk) 14:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you try to think up a different DYK hook for this entry? The current one isn't drawing me in because it's not really specific. Perhaps describing one particular nasty mechanism would be better. - Mgm| (talk) 15:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I posted something here, but it didn't get saved. :( Anyway, here's another source with photos, and to my eyes the clever Crepidotus versutus is the braniest looking one by far
[1]. The way the gills (or whatever you call those flaps) is particularly brainy looking. I posted from another source too, but I guess it's lost now. I'm confident in my theory. Please contact the Fungiologist who named it to confirm I am right. Gracias.
ChildofMidnight (
talk)
06:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Oh yeah, and the other comment I made that didn't get saved was that the fungiologist's whole "perhaps it was named for" theory was pretty weak. And in the article it says it's oriented for growth and in the DYK discussion I think you say it's to maximize spore dispersal. So my theory at least has the advantage of simplicity and consistency. Oh and I think one source said it is kidney shaped. Like a brain cross section right?
ChildofMidnight (
talk)
06:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 07:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Awesome job. I've nominated it. Bob the Wikipedian( talk • contribs) 16:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
» \ / ( ⁂ | ※) 02:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 08:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the review- you didn't transclude it on the article talk page, so I have only just noticed it, sorry. I'm just heading off to bed now, and probably won't be able to deal with the points you've raised until Sunday; it would be greatly appreciated if you could bare with me for the time being. Thanks J Milburn ( talk) 23:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
You've really outdone yourself this time. This species is even more fantastic than the last one. What will mother nature come up with next? ChildofMidnight ( talk) 01:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 02:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The 25 DYK Medal | |
Thank you for your multiple contributions to DYK. Your work on Wikipedia in the field of mycology adds encyclopedic value to the project and it is most appreciated. Your latest creation, Geastrum fornicatum, is an example of a nice well sourced piece - thank you for continuing to contribute to DYK in this capacity. Cirt ( talk) 05:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC) |
-- Dravecky ( talk) 20:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
-- Dravecky ( talk) 20:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sasata, I just wanted to let you know that I'm enjoying exposure to various fungi as you introduce them on Wikipedia, even the rather racy one that caused me to blush. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 20:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 22:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions there, they are very much appreciated. How did you find those articles so quickly? Do you have access to some kind of article search engine? J Milburn ( talk) 21:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 06:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hello! Your submission of
Cookeina at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Art LaPella (
talk)
02:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 08:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 07:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 13:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for all your great work, you are doing a great job of filling out the fungi content on Wikipedia. If I can make one suggestion: when adding lichenized fungi, I think it would be useful if you tag it with the Lichens category, as well as just Lecanoromycetes. The lichenized fungi are, in my mind, quite a discrete group of organisms. Thanks again! Millifolium ( talk) 02:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 18:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 00:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 12:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 11:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 17:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dravecky ( talk) 16:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Good work on all the DYKS I think I need ot take the plunge and get Amanita muscaria to GA and later FAC sometime soonish. I am just getting some more info on the whole Soma thing, but otherwise please feel free to give it a once- (or twice-over). I suppose this is an informal fungus peer-review (?) :) Casliber ( talk · contribs) 05:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the images and cleanup! That's great. J Milburn ( talk) 17:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for the welcome! I joined Project Fungi after creating the page for trama (mycology) -- which was originally just a weird disambig page ( trama) that wasn't even formatted to BE a disambig-- that piqued my intrest on the subject; since then I just started creating stubs and such for the high-priority requested articles in the project. I can't believe your edit count on here; figure we should make a "moldy barnstar" or something for your efforts on fungi! Irontobias ( talk) 07:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi thanks for offering to do the review! I have added the template. Thompsma ( talk) 08:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 21:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 20:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 02:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Clavulina cristata sasata.JPG, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
MER-C
07:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Dravecky ( talk) 08:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 08:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey,
You may want to nominate this image
at FPC for points at the wikicup --
Muhammad
(talk)
14:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 09:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass 03:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass 03:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Just read through Cyathus stercoreus and Cyathus olla and added them to the portal- nice work! You always find such weird species. I was just dropping by to let you know about categories- when you're creating a fungi article, there are several "easy" categories it will fit into quite quickly, based on the continents on which it is found. They are Category:Fungi of Europe, Category:Fungi of North America and so on. There's another for its edibility- Category:Edible mushrooms and Category:Inedible mushrooms (more at Category:Fungi by edibility, (not quite sure what would count as a mushroom and what wouldn't...) and, in this case, Category:Medicinal fungi. You can see the various categories that are available to you here-it'd be great if you could sort your new articles under a couple of relevant categories. J Milburn ( talk) 10:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for doing the GA review for SS. I think I have addressed most of your suggestions, let me know if I missed anything or if further clarification is required (I added some comments to the review page). Thanks again, cheers - Mr Bungle | talk 01:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for a thorough review and corrections. Yes, the article is not ment for general audience. I have to contemplate on how to be correct and brief, but also understood by everyone in specialized fields of science.
Shubinator ( talk) 18:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I left a query about your DYK nomination at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Xanthoria_elegans. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? ( talk) 00:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Lycoperdon umbrinum.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
MER-C
01:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Pisaura mirabilis on Plantago lanceolata.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
MER-C
01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Shubinator ( talk) 01:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Great work on that article! I have decided to pass it as a GA. Happy editing, and keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 14:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
That phallus you've been working on ( Phallus hadriani) is very nice. It's got a big head. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 05:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 11:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 22:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey there :), I was just reviewing some of your work at DYK (By then the way, an early congrats on the 50 DYK medal your going to be getting when the hooks I just approved get onto the main page :) ) and after looking over all of you contribs, I think that you would make a great admin, if your interested in giving a RfA a go, then just leave a note on my talk page and I'll write up my nom and we'll get this going :). All the Best, Mifter ( talk) 00:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for all your comments! I have addressed just about as many as I can right now (I will probably be in the library later today and can look for the missing page number you asked about); I've stricken the comments that were easy fixes (typos and such), but for some comments I'd like to hear your input as to whether or not my edits have actually resolved the problems, so I haven't stricken those...I also left some questions about how to proceed with some things (mostly about the lead images, and about having a brief run-down of the main linguistic subfields somewhere), so I'll wait for your signal before doing much more.
Thanks again, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 16:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Fungi Barnstar | |
I know you've already got one, but your recent work on Cyathus, list of Cyathus species and the articles on some of the species themselves has been particularly awesome. Thanks for devoting so much of your time and expertise to the project. J Milburn ( talk) 14:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks! I'm planning for these Cyathus articles to be part of a featured (or good) topic, hopefully I can get it done for a later round of the WikiCup. Sasata ( talk) 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your thorough review of my article. I will be addressing those points as soon as possible. I may ask you a few questions throughout the process, that is if you do not mind. Once again, thank you! -- Saunc2011 ( talk) 19:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shubinator ( talk) 01:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Mammal barnstar.png | The Mammal Barnstar | |
In recognition of your efforts reviewing both White-headed Capuchin and Mantled Howler for GA, making excellent suggstions to improve both articles, I award you the Mammal barnster Rlendog ( talk) 04:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Danilot ( talk) 19:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
P.S. If you aren't tired of monkey articles by then, I hope to get Geoffroy's Spider Monkey into shape for GAN in the near future, although I still have work to do. Rlendog ( talk) 04:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 08:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Fungi Double Barnstar | |
In recognition of your efforts in bringing fungi pictures to their proper place (throughout the featured picture archives) I award you the double barnstar of |
However, I'm afraid that I can't find any other historical images worth restoring... Well, actually, that's a lie, but [2] and [3] seem to lack sufficient bibliographic detail - Anyway, barring figuring out enough details to move forward with that, I think I've been about all the help I can be, imagewise, unless there's something you know of and would like me to do. Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 08:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |