Hello SarahT87, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

{{ editprotected}}

Hi, could you let me know what page you would like edited and the exact content of the edits? I'll be happy to help once you let me know (or you can put the {{ editprotected}} notice directly on the protected page's talk page, along with the specifics about the edit). -- CapitalR ( talk) 02:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Salespeople Communication requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —  LinguistAtLarge •  Talk  17:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Salespeople Communication, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article reads like an essay. It has substantial grammatical issues, notwithstanding the addition of a template it hasn't been improved in about a month, and while sources are offered the article is not approached as an encyclopedia entry. At the very least it would need a major cleanup (which might amount to a total rewrite) in order to be encyclopedic. I think this article may also fail some aspects of WP:HOWTO insofar as it acts as an instruction manual.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tyrenon ( talk) 21:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply