Welcome!
Hello, SEY01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --
AW
18:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I put the wrong welcome message before. Now there's a normal one. -- AW 18:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Although I noticed one thing - when you are leaving messages, make sure to sign your name using four tildes (~~~~). That way it will show your name and date like so AW 19:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I see what you're saying now. Khoi khoi 10:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
No I did not change my mind I did agree to have ASALA in the see also section, but I at that time when we agreed to place it in the see also section, there was no section in the article about the ASALA activities, but now there is and the article is now linked to the ASALA page from that section. ROOB323 20:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure. What I do know is that the Kurds are highly thought of in Greece - look at this picture:
http://www.geocities.com/pontos10/pontianlobby_otsalankalenderidis.jpg
It's Abdullah Öcalan sitting (smiling) in between the vice president of the Greek Parliament (Panayotis Sgouridis) and the major of the Hellenic National Intelligence Service, also known as the "Greek Secret Police" in Turkey (Savas Kalenderidis). Both Pontians of course. ;-) Khoi khoi 09:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed the external link to the text of Article 66 of the Constitution of Turkey you added after the word "Turkishness" in Article 301 (Turkish penal code). It is not clear to me what your aim was in adding this link, but in any case, without further context and explanation this is more confusing than clarifying. If you want to clarify the notion of "Turkishness" (Türklük), that is a laudable goal, but I think this is not the way to achieve it. It is not clear that the question "What is Türklük?" can be reduced to the question "Who is a Turk?". [1] [2] It would be nice to have a short subsection entitled "What is Turkishness?" in the text of the article, but in that case we must make sure that what is stated there fits the requirement of attributibility. -- Lambiam Talk 15:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't objecting to the date, but the use of the word "liberation" itself. It stikes me as a POV term. I know that all Turks would agree that it was indeed a liberation, but I doubt that the non-Turkish inhabitants of the city (such as the Armenians) saw it that way. Same with the French. Therefore, I propose that a more neutral word be used. As for your second comment, you can find many sources available on the subject at Google Books and Google Scholar. You don't only have to use the normal Google search. Khoi khoi 07:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
The reason might be that it affects our relationship with other countries. I don't remember making an edit about that, but I might have made. deniz T C 12:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Maybe you could try leaving a message on his talk page instead. As for now, I've commented-out the info from the article. That means it's there, but you just can't see it. Khoi khoi 04:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
The recent edits to Turkish do not reflect any disagreement over substance, but rather a concern over what type of content is appropriate on a disambiguation page. A disambiguation page is not an article; it should only have the minimal information needed to assist a reader who searched for the term "Turk", "Turkish", or "Turkic" (or clicked on a link) to find the most appropriate article for the context in which they are interested. -- Russ (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
No, by original research I mean you "figured it out" on your own--you didn't read it elsewhere--which makes it inappropriate for Wikipedia. I removed it when I found it the first time, and I will continue to remove it. Lexicon (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with Lexicon. It's clearly original research (read WP:OR for details), and as such your additions to this article will continue to be reverted indefinitely by other editors; it could even lead to you being blocked, so simply stop it. Okay? — Nightstallion 12:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)