|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 366 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 15 sections are present. |
What, me worry?
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to May 31 does not have an edit summary. Hi. We are supposed to be using Edit Summaries when reverting Pending Changes. Cheers!
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.
Thanks! {{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
07:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Um, surely it's an improvised replica firearm, (ie not actually a firearm), given it appears to have a solid wooden dowel for a barrel.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Snori ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 29 January 2016
Hi Rwessel, I don't know how Wikipedia works . Saw you edited some information about me on page "Mehwish Hayat" . Need your help regarding an issue/error . I don't even know if this message of mine will get through to you or not.. But if it does please Do get back to me as it's very important . Thanks ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissHayat ( talk • contribs) 23:07, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Thankyou for your prompt response. Good to hear from you .
The issue is that the date of birth and age mentioned on Wikipedia is misquoted and has been misleading my fans who trust wiki with their lives .
I believe it's important to get the correct information across and Keeping that in mind I I even mentioned this in one of my recent interviews
With "The News" which is an authentic and a reliable source .
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://tns.thenews.com.pk/inteview-with-mehwish-hayat-what-the-cat-says/#.Vq5VTUXXenN
Where I clearly mentioned that Wikipedia has been misquoting my age . But I don't know how Wikipedia works .. I thought you could help me with this so I
wrote to you . Please go through the article and let me know what can be done . I would really appreciate . Thanks
MissHayat (
talk)
23:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Also please let me know is there any other way to contact you such as email ? Wikipedia is really complicated . I've been trying to write back so many times but not sure if it's getting through . Thanks MissHayat ( talk) 23:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, why are Wiki editors showing double standards and removed any content related to this controversy? It has been documented by mainstream media. Saiteja67 ( talk) 05:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Banjara-Hills-brawl-Police-report-nails-Ram-Charans-lies/articleshow/20753299.cms
There is a claim in this article /info/en/?search=Russian_military_intervention_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War quote: "The incident followed over month-long tensions over alleged repeated violations of Turkish airspace by Russian military jets — over nine times in October,[170]" However, the primary source - #170 mentions only 2 violations. My attempt to note that the claim about 'over 9' violations is not properly backed by any primary source was rejected. I would like to know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.228.253.143 ( talk) 10:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Checkingfax. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from List of stand-up comedians. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.
In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation.
Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a
non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! {{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
13:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Amccann421. Your recent edit to the page April 20 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Prince officially died on April 21, not April 20. Thanks. Amccann421 (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
http://euro200.net/Bulgarije-top-40.htm
Hi :)
Please can you add this to the Charts section in Cheap Thrills article?
The song peaked at #1 there. And here's the source.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.155.54.4 ( talk) 12:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
I disagree. This is obviously not a reason to get blocked, things got personally and that's it. Anyway, it's a Wikipedia rule that the edits from blocked users and/or anonymous IPs can DEFINITELY be accepted,nevertheless. As long as the source is there. I can link you to that rule if you want. 5.0.201.215 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
And hey here is the OFFICIAL Estonian singles chart http://uuno.postimees.ee/top-chart/20/top-chart-20332 And that is the Portuguese OFFICIAL singles chart http://portuguesecharts.com/archive.asp?todo=show&woche=18&jahr=2016&sparte=s
Both charts obviously show where the song peaked. Please consider things from an objective perspective nevertheless, and btw I don't know how to "unblock" and what legitimate reason I was blocked for in the first place, if that explains how complicated this situation unnecessarily has become. Thank you a lot for your time. Appreciated.
Just by now noticed the edit conflict, sorry for being such a headache to you. Thanks a lot for your time, again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.0.201.215 ( talk) 23:59, 26 May 2016
Please avoid changing or deleting other people's contributions on talk pages. I'll assume this was an accident, and just re-add my comment here:
I will. It really was by incident. And I read what you typed, nevertheless, thinking that was the purpose and that's it. Please take these sources I provided under consideration, as I just added two more links. Since we are all here to contribute, and seemingly, so far, to learn :) 5.0.201.215 ( talk) 00:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
This is exactly how I knew the last two sources are reliable. WP:GOODCHARTS + the abscence of them from the WP:BADCHARTS Well, just to remind you that by this prejudice User:SummerPhDv2 put on the table, so now on, any one with no account here, logging in from my country or a neighbour one, is gonna be the blocked User:SalemHanna?
Wikipedia in no court, never was, never will be. And as soon as I re-find that article, which clearly says that blocked users can still contribute if only their sources are legitimate -if a ting-, i'll put the link here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.0.201.215 ( talk) 00:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Woops! The link User:SummerPhDv2 just made him look like a hypocrite, proving the block he is responsible for is for personal reasons NOT practical ones, seemingly. And I quote from WP:Evade: Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule. This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.
Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) [[unless they can show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits.
New accounts which engage in the same behavior as a banned editor or blocked account in the same context, and who appear to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, are subject to the remedies applied to the editor whose behavior they are imitating.[1] ]]
I mean, it's all clear now. Objectivity is key. 5.0.201.215 ( talk) 00:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Nah sorry buddy, the rule is right here above and what it says is clear, and by the way I have already did contributions to other articles as well despite that "I am the blocked user" so what am I exactly losing here? The rule is clear, and my contributions with accompanyed sources are submitted, so you really aren't the one doing yourself a favor here. If it's a thing it's YOU summer who needs to justify her prejudice, even against famous singers lmao. Kind regards everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.155.127.104 ( talk) 14:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I didn't change were to was as suggested in your edit summary. I merely restored the genre 'heavy metal' the removal of which also broke the infobox &/or page display. Eagleash ( talk) 00:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, why did you revert my edit here? I was simply removing an opinionated part. driftmaster130 ( talk · edits) 11:58, 12 June 2016 (EDT)
Hello, Rwessel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Rwessel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Rwessel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)