This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the
3 Core Content Policies:
Brochures:
Editing Wikipedia &
Illustrating Wikipedia |
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes ~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
Thanks for your recent edits! I first noticed this one and am impressed by the good referencing. — Bilorv ( talk) 22:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hi, thanks for your work on List of awards and nominations received by Community so far. If you're interested, I think we could co-nominate it for featured list status soon, where other editors review the list and give feedback, and if it meets the featured list criteria then it gets a shiny gold star at the top of the page, marking it as a mostly complete and comprehensive list. I've done this with a couple of similar pages before like List of awards and nominations received by Black Mirror. Let me know what you think! — Bilorv ( talk) 20:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
O3000 ( talk) 15:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your work in getting the Community awards list promoted, particularly all the times you beat me to answering the reviewer comments. :) — Bilorv ( Black Lives Matter) 12:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Janet(s) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox ( talk) 02:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Janet(s) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Janet(s) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox ( talk) 02:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! I've left a response there – hope you'll have a look at that. Cheers! — Bloom6132 ( talk) 06:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
On 6 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Janet(s), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that D'Arcy Carden has about 40 minutes of screen time in " Janet(s)" even though the episode is only 22 minutes long? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janet(s). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Janet(s)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, RunningTiger123. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by Community – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 18. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 01:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Your review at the Ray Bradbury Award FLC was possibly the most thorough I've ever received in nearly 70 nominations- I've certainly never had anyone check the data for an entire table against the sources so closely for discrepancies. While I'm embarrassed that you managed to find so many discrepancies that should have been caught prior to nomination, I'm incredibly grateful that you did so, and the list is much better for it. Pres N 03:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC) |
I'll give you "controversial," but could you talk us through why " sabotage" should be unlinked in this article? Thanks-- A21sauce ( talk) 14:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
To me, sabotage is a word that most people would know, and it's not particularly relevant to the article in that you could substitute other words for it (i.e. disrupt, impair, undermine) without really changing the meaning. Here is a good litmus test for adding a link based on MOS:OVERLINK: if a person reading the article would not be expected to know a term, or if the word provides worthwhile additional context beyond a simple definition, the link should be added; otherwise, it should be omitted. Since most readers would know what "sabotage" means and the article on sabotage wouldn't add anything particularly relevant to the article beyond the definition, I removed it. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 14:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)A good question to ask yourself is whether reading the article you're about to link to would help someone understand the article you are linking from. Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked: [...] Everyday words understood by most readers in context (e.g., education, violence, aircraft, river)
Sorry if I was a little snappy on the FLC
List of Star Wars films. I wasn't in the best of moods and really believe that Star Wars deserves better. Hope this wikilove finds you well. ~
HAL
333(
[1])
23:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Basic Lupine Urology you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 18:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Basic Lupine Urology, has passed the Good Article criteria, becoming a good article on December 19, 2020. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this image of a cute cat. Enjoy! |
The article Basic Lupine Urology you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Basic Lupine Urology for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 15:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Impeachment: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Emma ( chats ✦ edits) 21:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Some Dude From North Carolina has eaten your {{ subst:cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{ subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by The Office (American TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Klein. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I have withdrawn the candidate. But I see that you write that there are proposal that I have not put in place. I have checked well but there are no proposals that I have not taken into consideration. Of course I can be wrong Dr Salvus ( talk) 21:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
That's not the FL reviewers' responsibility. If you want to get the list to FL status, you have to be willing to put in the work. I'm not trying to be mean; we all simply have our own projects we're working on and can't dedicate time to yours as well.
If you're interested in looking in where to look for archives, I would suggest trying the Wikipedia Library. It has access to databases, especially newspapers, that may have the information you're looking for. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 17:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Could you briefly explain to me why you opposed the FL page nomination? DrSalvus ( talk) 14:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
{{subst:FLC}}
to that page. You did the first part (adding the template), but not the second part. If you go to the
talk page now, you'll notice the redlink indicating that this nomination was not properly initiated. It is important to open the nomination correctly so all of the relevant tools are displayed on the FLC page and so the bot can properly close the nomination.
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
16:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
While I do not necessarily oppose the nomination based on content, I also agree that there are still issues that need to be addressed, as I noted in the previous FLC.Generally, I do not outright oppose nominations that need improvement; I make a list of things that need to be improved, and the nominator works to address those comments. This is what I did (and other reviewers did as well) on the previous nomination; we added our comments for improvement and tried to clarify whenever there was confusion over our comments. However, since you closed that nomination, I'm not going to keep working to provide comments. In short: this list is not ready for featured list status, and because of the cycle of repeated nominations and withdrawals, I'm not going to keep commenting on nominations. I know this must feel bad to hear, but if you complete the peer review, reread comments in past nominations, and continue to make changes, I'd be more than happy to consider a nomination further down the road. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 17:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
:::::::::Now I am no longer interested in FL's nomination of
List of Coppa Italia finals. But do you think that the lack of data on the spectators of the oldest finals was a problem?
Dr
Salvus
19:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Did I forget to make some changes? Dr Salvus 22:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
I had asked ChrisTheDude without receiving an answer. Now I have to give up because it will never be an FL and I don't want to return in the WP:ANI Dr Salvus 22:28, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
You are right, but my biggest fear is that I will make a mistake, go back to the WP: ANI and be blocked. I am resigned. Dr Salvus 10:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
I will take into consideration what has been said Dr Salvus 19:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi RT, hope you are well! You very kindly reviewed at least one of my previous FLC nominations - if you had a spare moment I wondered whether you might be able to give a review to Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1951/archive1? If not, not to worry. Cheers! -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 10:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paradigms of Human Memory you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 00:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
The article Paradigms of Human Memory you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paradigms of Human Memory for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 17:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
The article Paradigms of Human Memory you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paradigms of Human Memory for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 20:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
You've got an email Dr Salvus 21:45, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey again! I was currently editing the pilot episode of The Good Place and nominating it for GA when I noticed you were a top contributor on later episodes of the show, including " Michael's Gambit" and " Whenever You're Ready". As you've previously nominated episode articles before, I was just wondering if you ever planned to nominate these two articles for potential GA-status, as I would be happy to review them. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 00:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Dobkin.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 18:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 21:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 00:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
Thank you for completing 5 reviews in the March 2021 backlog drive. Your work helped us reduce the backlog by over 52%. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC) |
On 22 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paradigms of Human Memory, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Community catchphrase "six seasons and a movie" originated in " Paradigms of Human Memory" as a reference to The Cape? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paradigms of Human Memory. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Paradigms of Human Memory), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
On 1 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Andrew Guest wrote " Advanced Dungeons & Dragons" despite having no experience playing the titular game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Parks and Recreation Special, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Parks and Recreation Special you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 20:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
The article A Parks and Recreation Special you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:A Parks and Recreation Special for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 20:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
The article A Parks and Recreation Special you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Parks and Recreation Special for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 23:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there- Awaiting your valuable response at List of presidents of the Indian National Congress. Please let us know if you have more questions with regard to the list.-- 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 09:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The SPFLT Achievement Patch | ||
Your help is much appreciated. Welcome to the spacey section of WP! Neopeius ( talk) 03:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC) |
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, RunningTiger123. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by The Office (American TV series) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for August 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
I've read your comments for 93rd Academy Awards regarding its promotion to featured list status, and I have made corrections and changes based on those comments. Thanks for your feedback.
Hi, the commentary (I would call it simply a fact) in the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons doesn't need a citation, since the TV series episodes mentioned in it just speak for themselves and all it takes is seeing them or knowing the plot.
Hi there,
I've read your comments for 56th Academy Awards regarding its promotion to featured list status, and I have made corrections and changes based on those comments. Thanks for your feedback.
The Reviewers Award | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the detailed and actionable review you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild ( talk) 12:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there,
There seems to be a conflict regarding how to report medals that have yet to be reallocated regarding the 2012 Summer Olympics medal table. Nitobus thinks the cases of yet to be redistributed medals should be listed, but 215XBux says that you were right about WP:Crstal, initially. You can read the discussion here. So, how can this possible conflict be resolved?
The Featured Article Medal | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild ( talk) 20:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC) |
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Janet(s). — Bilorv ( talk) 17:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC) |
You had replied on the page of my FLC nomination for the article List of Houston Texans seasons. I couldn't quite understand your concerns and request you to explain them once more if you could. I also wish to add the fact that I have corrected the reference-section. Thanks for the help.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 14:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
I am really sorry, but I still fail to get you. Sorry to trouble you. But could you explain the first point again on footnotes.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 14:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Could you please provide me with an example similar to my article if you could? That would help me to compare and correct better. Sorry again for disturbing you. Do you want me to separate footnotes and linked-references in the article? Is that what you meant?-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 14:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Is it ok now?... Please inform me if there are any more flaws. Thanks for the help.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 16:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Is it correct now?.. And thanks once again.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 16:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
So if I add 1 ref for each year's pick (a reliable one), the problem is solved?-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 16:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Is it fine now?...I think I got you this time. At least I hope so.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 17:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thanks a lot for patiently helping me out. Atlantis77177 ( talk) 18:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC) |
You can stay the fuck off of it. Let this serve as a notice that you are banned from my talk page except for any required notifications for AN/I or ARBCOM. —
Locke Cole •
t •
c
18:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, RunningTiger123. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by Mad Men – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 26. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
What was your objection to the proposed deletion (for convenience, on the basis of redundancy with Grammatical tense, Memory, and ~ Arrow of time) of Past? Take care,
- IncompleteBits ( talk) 18:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The "past" is a notable topic, so deleting it wholesale is probably not the right move. At the very least, an AfD would allow more thorough consideration of alternatives, such as redirects and merges.To put it another way, since the past is a notable topic, I don't think a simple deletion is the best option, as most uncontroversial deletions are for topics that clearly lack notability. If you think that it covers topics already discussed in other articles, a merge discussion would probably be the better option. Additionally, I highly doubt that we want to remove all content for "past" – it's a common term and therefore a reasonable search term, so a conversion to redirect would likely be better than outright deletion. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 18:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. I just wanted to let you know that I have started to watch The Good Place and I am really enjoying it so far. I am only on the first season though, but I am looking forward to watching it more. Aoba47 ( talk) 23:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could proofread List of accolades received by The Shape of Water regarding featured list promotion. I would appreciate the feedback.
Hi RT123!
Sorry for the intrusion but would you mind please having a look at the amended proposed external link for DISH Network? I added it about a week ago but no luck yet with any responses. I mentioned User:WhatamIDoing but may not have done it properly (or the user is busy).
Also, perhaps we could discuss further links and potential contributions I could make to WikiProject TV? I had reached out to some project users but not heard back. Happy to 'discuss' via email or my talk page.
Thanks kindly and have a great weekend! GebienD ( talk) 20:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm most interested in adding/updating channel lists for the various "multichannel" and streaming TV providers. I think Project TV has a particular section on that. Also, I noticed there is void on Wiki regarding the overall landscape of streaming TV platforms. It turns out it's a really complicated area so perhaps I could write an article explaining how the various streaming platforms are organized from a hierarchical perspective and tie into one another. The biggest challenge with that though on Wikipedia is demonstrating the hierarchy using text (it's better IMO to show it using an illustration). But who knows, perhaps an internal link to such an image would work. Regardless, yes, I'm up to the task! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GebienD ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're having a great weekend. It's been a couple weeks since I posted the new proposed DISH Network link and it appears the other user who was helping has checked out. I've put a lot of work into the referenced page and wonder if I can ask your help getting this moving please? I don't wish to pressure you but at the same time I have been patient. I'm not sure what else to do. On another note, please be reminded the advantage of my link is the channel list is fully up to date and is print friendly. The list is also now sortable. Please advise? Thank you! :) GebienD ( talk) 01:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
Would you kindly review List of accolades received by Dunkirk for featured list promotion? I would gladly appreciate the feedback.
By the way, great job on the copyedit for the 73rd Primetime Emmy Awards for featured list promotion. I might consider doing something for similar Primetime Emmy ceremonies. I gave feedback on your FLC.
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
lists of awards
Thank you for quality articles around television series, such as Janet(s), List of awards and nominations received by Community, List of awards and nominations received by The West Wing, 73rd Primetime Emmy Awards, for diligent reviewing, for the smile caused by the running tigers pictured on your user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2692 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Can you have a look to the nomination and comment it, please? Your feedback would be appreciated Dr Salvus 19:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there,
I have read your comments regarding the featured list promotion of the 2020 Summer Olympics medal table, and finally I have been able to address them. However, I have one remark that is supposed to be confirmed by Giants2008 and one question regarding a stripped silver medal.
Hi, RunningTiger123. I'm just posting to let you know that 72nd Primetime Emmy Awards – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there,
I reviewed the 72nd Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards for featured list promotion, and it looks good. I request that you do the same for the 58th Academy Awards regarding its corresponding featured list nomination. I would appreciate the feedback.
Hi there, again,
I made corrections based on your comments about the 58th Academy Awards regarding its featured list nomination. Thanks for the feedback.
Oh please, don't worry about the lateness; if anything, I'm glad that someone listened. I couldn't have summarized it better. Thanks.
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could review List of accolades received by If Beale Street Could Talk for its pending featured list promotion. I would appreciate the feedback. Warning: I will not be able to respond to your queries until May 23 because its my birthday.
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. ( t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC) |
The honourable opposer's award | |
By the authority vested in me by myself I present you with this award in recognition of one or more well argued opposes at FAC. I may or or may not agree with your reasoning and/or your oppose, but I take a Voltarian attitude towards your right to state it. Thank you, such stands help to make Wikipedia stronger. Gog the Mild ( talk) 19:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
Hi there,
I made some correction based on your comments about the 53rd Academy Awards upon its featured list candidacy. I'm planning to do a rewrite of the 94th Academy Awards for FLC on August 13 (after I get through the 52nd Academy Awards, but what's bothering is how I should address the Will Smith-Chris Rock slapping incident. I really think the list in its current state looks messy and reads like a gossip magazine. I waited for a few months to avoid an editing war. I was wondering if you could rewrite the Will Smith-Chris Rock section (or better yet the entire Ceremony information) and I would give you credit when the list is nominated. If not, would you be so kind as time give me advice on what should belong and shouldn't. Thanks. -- Birdienest81 talk 11:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)