Welcome!
Hello, Rundquist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering with us. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vsmith 23:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rundquist. I believe that the Jakob Spafford article is unverifiable. You should go ahead and propose it for AfD. i will be supporting its deletion. Thanks for spotting this one. Best, Gwernol 02:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
IrishGuy 20:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
I'd been wanting to start the article myself for some time now, but it seemed like such a daunting task that I couldn't bring myself to actually do it! Thank you for writing such an excellent article on this important film, and on finding an excellent image that summarizes the mood of the film so well (I took several screenshots from my own DVD, but I couldn't find one that fit as well as yours does). I've added some information to it, and I'm afraid that I might have made it read not quite as smoothly - it's hard to express in words a concept like "the structure of memory", so if you can change it so that it reads more eloquently, please do so. :) Esn 20:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I have created Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Burma. I have added you along with added 18 other users (including myself) to the list of involved parties. The ones I have listed are ones who have commented recently, or who commented on the Mediation Cabal case (except if they solely made a neutral comment). If you disagree with me listing you there, remove yourself from it if you wish. If you feel someone else should be involved, add/ask them. I hope those I have added are alright though. I also hope this step is what finally ends this dispute! Deamon138 ( talk) 00:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Rundquist. Thanks for letting me know about your edit to the Aufbau article. I disagree with your position. I added my note to yours in the discussion page to explain why there are exclusions to the Aufbau, but not to the Madelung Rule. I also undid your modification to the article. Regards, Drova ( talk) 21:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Dear Rundquist,
Couple of days ago I posted my conciliatory response to your post on discussion page of Aufbau article. I did not hear from you. Do you agree with my offer, or do you want me to come up with new language? Please, let me know. Drova ( talk) 20:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 21:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
|
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
ralphamale ( talk) 21:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 23:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) ( talk) 08:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)