Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
John Locke (Lost), did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
TeaDrinker
17:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Lorraine Kelly, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —
Insanity Incarnat
e
23:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Lewis Hamilton appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our
core policies. Thank you.
Beve (
talk)
07:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Narson (
talk)
17:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Lewis Hamilton. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Beve (
talk)
17:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I have put a message up regarding your breach of 3RR here. Sorry for the delay in telling you - Hanlon's razor applies! Pfainuk talk 18:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
— slakr\ talk / 21:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Robbo25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I thought Wikipedia was about creating articles using fair and accurate facts, clearly that is not true. The addition was correct and backed-up with a source
Decline reason:
We blocked you for edit warring, not necessarily for inserting false information (although I've yet to look at what it was you were adding). When your edits get removed, you're expected to discuss with others why it was removed rather than repeatedly putting it back in. — Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 21:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
00:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to
Lewis Hamilton. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Pyrop
e
01:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked for edit warring at Lewis Hamilton. Because you were blocked for the same behavior at the same article and evidently did not take it seriously, the block is now 72 hours. You may resume editing after the block expires, but any further edit warring will result in even longer blocks without warning. Discuss the changes you want to make instead of reverting, not in addition to it. Kafziel Complaint Department 01:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
And the detractors have still not providing a suitable reason why it shouldn't be included. It works both ways you know!!! -- Robbo25 ( talk) 12:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
I suggest you look up "insult" because you clearly don't know the definition of it. They didn't give valid reasons at all it was nothing more than POV and they continued to vandalise the article by removing a perfectly acceptable contribution. -- Robbo25 ( talk) 21:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
More worthless excuses, it's embarrassing! Again; the addition I made to the article was valid and factually correct, but that seems to be an issue with some members of this community all they care for is articles based on a majorities POV. -- Robbo25 ( talk) 22:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)