![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Okay. But Undertaker and Mr. Kennedy are in the bigger feud than Kane and MVP and Undertaker and Mr. Kennedy together are the two bigger stars than Kane and MVP. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
Try to avoid mass AFD's if possible. I have been involved in quite a few and nearly every time the result was to keep them all because of time to examine every article to see which articles are worth keeping. Try to make it as painless as possible and create seperate AFD's. semper fi — Moe 05:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Want to try going back to WP:AN or WP:AN/I and discussing with more people? Maybe, we can get more input and a better community response. I agree, I see TJ reverting every person's edit for sometimes illogical reasons. He edits now to escalate tensions between other editors, such as yourself. Nishkid 64 20:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
As one of your colleagues in the assessment field, I know how easy it can be to overlook the substantial contributions made by assessments, and also know how difficult performing assessments can be. On that basis, I believe you are more than deserving of this barnstar for your extraordinary efforts in assessing articles for several projects, and your contributions to wikipedia in general. Your assessments, together with the Trivia Cleanup project you began, have greatly improved a number of our articles, and I believe that this recognition of your contributions is long past due. Badbilltucker 22:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
I'm starting two have doubts about splitting the tag teams from the stables. I'm thinking if we spilt those up, that we might get some confusion as they wouldn't be on the same page. I was thinking of actually splitting the article up into current tag teams and stables and former tag teams and stables. What do you think? semper fi — Moe 01:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, man. Clay4president 02:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Why so accomodating of vandals? I call out a really nasty vandal (check his log!) and you berate me for it. Whether or not you know it, Wikipedia's under increasing threat from vandals. Why do you want to be nice to those who are bound and determined to shut down this valiant effort? All it takes is a critical mass of people noticing that a lot of their articles of interest contain random vandalism and this site will die. Don't you care about that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hyperionred ( talk • contribs) 19:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
I removed your sourcing tag from the Mark Meadows page. The source of the information is from personal knowledge of the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.222.245.190 ( talk • contribs)
P.S. - please direct me to the guideline stating that personal knowledge is not an acceptable source for non-controversial biographical articles. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.222.245.190 ( talk • contribs)
Go to WP:RFC then. It's a good suggestion, and I apologize for not telling you to go there in the first place. Nishkid 64 22:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Now, I appreciate what you're doing with the trivia cleanup thing, really. If you check the history and talk page of The Wizard (film), you'll note I've been keeping the trivia there trimmed down (it used to be a LOT worse). I think the size of the trivia section is fine on the page as it is, so I took the tag down. Every piece left is relevant to the movie and something else, or at least worth noting. If you feel a particular piece of trivia on the page isn't worthy of being there, please bring it up on the talk page for me. Don't just tag the article because you feel it's "too much". Thanks. -- UsaSatsui 11:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
The rest have prods and Ric Flair and Roddy Piper doesnt have anything at the moment. Snitsky and Tomko can be deleted after tomorrow according to its prod --- Paulley
I was going to get it deleted after I spilt the page. Sorry I haven't been around much to help with that, it feels like I'm trying to do 15 things at once. Once all the non-notable tags and stables are deleted it should be easier to organize. semper fi — Moe 21:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey Rob I've extended the article quite a bit since you rated it, adding an infobox. Don't you think it is more of a "start" than a "stub"?-- Silverscreen 15:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I have to say I'm a little shocked that an unreferenced tag has been slapped on this stub, a mere two days after it came into existence. It doesn't even make any statements that can't be derived directly from watching the movie and reading the book (from the article on which this stub was just spun off). Given time I will quote L'Engle about the movie, and find some articles and books to cite, but I really think there's not much there yet to source! Karen | Talk | contribs 03:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
You wrote: "Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made". To counter, I would like to ask you not to add maintenance notices to pages without a thorough discussion on the validity of the notice. Your notices are literally trivial and add unnecessary clutter. Ericpaulson 03:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the scope of the Novels Wiki Project is fiction only. The Black Jacobins as such does not qualify. Errabee 02:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Hmm...can you show me some comparisons? I just want to see the differences and similarities between the pages. Also, wouldn't it be reasonable that most of the article looks the same as the official website? The event hasn't occurred yet, and if there are no external resources available, then it would be reasonable if they looked a bit similar. Anyway, I need some website vs. article comparisons to make sure. Nishkid 64 02:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Yea, i removed the events section from IPW:UK... and wrote about the more note worthy ones in the promotion's history section. ---- Paulley
Yea any help would be good... esspecially now he is making fancruft tag team pages too... and i know how much you dont like them lol --- Paulley
If the guy's not talking, just ignore it and manually fix up the articles. He/she might not speak good english, or they just might not care. Whatever the reason, think of the encyclopedia first, and personal issues second. Nishkid 64 22:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Rob, I had a question on sourcing of articles such as Flesh and Fantasy (1943 film), which I recently created. The bulk of the article is a recitation of the plot, which I know about by watching the movie, and the cast list is from IMDB. OK, I can see citing IMDB as sourcing for the cast list, but how do I source the plot? I checked out other movie articles and did not find much sourcing generally except for links to IMDB at the end.-- Silverscreen 19:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks yr response. Have added link to IMDB. -- Silverscreen 22:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I am new to wikipedia and you have edited a page i have created, i was wondering if you could help me to format the page to fit the wikistyle in order to save it from deletion. the page was for the owl society. -crankset
I notice you removed the quotes from the article Homer's Enemy. While you have a point that long quote lists should be on WikiQuote, You just removed the section and didn't put it on WikiQuote, nor link to it. I just thought that this was a rather rude thing to do, as the quote list was quite extensive and entertaining. I will add this quote list to WikiQuote, but realise that there are quote lists on a lot of other Simpsons episodes, so I don't exactly see the point in removing them from just one episode. Please consider next time tagging the quotes section for being moved to WikiQuote, or simply move the section yourself. -Andy
I noticed you nominated for this for deletion before. I never saw it on WP:PW, which would have helped you. I've re-nominted it for deletion and listed it at WP:PW as well. TJ Spyke 06:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. My name is Sean Wolfington and i have uploaded a picture per your suggestion. However, i don't know how to add it to the article about myself. Do you know how to do this or could you advise me? Here is the link to the photo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sean_Wolfington_picture.jpg#filelinks
Hey Rob, you marked the Toontown Online article for laundrylist cleanup, but you didn't add a reference of it to the WP:LAUNDRY project page (i.e. list of articles marked for cleaning). I deleted one long laundry list (a list of cog types) but not sure whether that's enough to satisfy the project. Can you clarify which additiona list(s) you're concerned about? Vandelay 07:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I removed your request for photos from Hitman and Tomb Raider 3. I think it's way too early to be requesting photos for films that aren't even guaranteed to be made. The request is more realistic for films known to have entered production, such as 30 Days of Night, for which there is a photo now. Hope you understand the reasoning for the removal. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 19:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for helping me with the photo. How do i update the caption section you are talking about? By the way, i read that you love movies. We just made the movie that won the Toronto Film Festival. If you tell me where you live i can invite you to the closest private screening we have before the general release if you want. Here is the link to the picture again for your reference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sean_Wolfington_picture.jpg#filelinks Seanwolfington 20:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't see it as cruft. The RR match is one of WWE's biggest traditions, and only a small handful of wrestlers make their first appearence each year. I would be happy to discuss it further if you wish, although there's no reason it can't be listed. TJ Spyke
You added cleanup and unsourced tags to this page. Can you clarify why you did this on the talk page of list of child actors? Ik.pas.aan 00:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Sigh...I'll leave him a message on his talk page. Nishkid 64 02:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
May I ask who said you can decide what is notable and what isn't? I haven't seen anyone but you object to them being mentioned. TJ Spyke 00:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)