The page Draft:4D Miner Wiki doesn't at present have any substantial content, and appears to serve no purpose other than publicising a wiki on Fandom. Since that is contrary to Wikipedia’s policy against using Wikipedia for promotion of any kind, I shall delete the page. You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if you are interested in doing so, but if your only interest is in attracting people to your Fandom wiki, then Wikipedia is not the right place to do it. JBW ( talk) 08:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, RickDoesYT!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
nearlyevil
665
09:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:4D Miner Wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. nearlyevil 665 09:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter. JBW ( talk) 10:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JBW (
talk)
13:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC) is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
RickDoesYT ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
'I have learnt from my past mistakes and I think it has been long enough to prove that.'
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 13:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RickDoesYT ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand what I was blocked for 1 year ago, but as it's been 1 year I think I should be unblocked because now, the only thing I'll use this account for is fixing typos and updating information on existing pages, yes, I know what I did 1 year ago was wrong & stupid and I shouldn't have done that, but I personally think 1 year is long enough and I would like to please be unblocked. RickDoesYT ( talk) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I think you can be unblocked. However, before we unblock you, we'd like to know that you understand our rules. It would help if you explained what rule you broke and why it shouldn't be broken. You don't have to write an essay or apologize. Just give us a brief explanation like "I shouldn't let my cat drive the car because cats are generally very poor drivers, and they might cause car accidents. In the future, I'll drive the car myself and keep my cat in the passenger seat." It's been a while, so if you're don't remember what exactly got you blocked, see Special:Diff/1090941806 and Special:Diff/1090955478. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RickDoesYT ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I won't create pages linking to Fandom (or any other website) and leave the page just that as I did 1 year ago because it is advertisement and advertisement is bad because it doesn't contribute to Wikipedia. RickDoesYT ( talk) 16:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I am happy to give you another chance. I hope you will now have a successful time as a contributor to Wikipedia. JBW ( talk) 20:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
This is a good start, but I also need to feel confident that you understand what promotional language is. Please answer the following questions:
Thanks. Z1720 ( talk) 18:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
I am willing to consider unblocking your account to give you another chance. However, there is one point which you need to clear up. In
UTRS appeal #76158,
Deepfriedokra suggested that you had been evading your block by editing logged out. Is that so? If so, can you tell us what you did and why?
JBW (
talk)
16:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)