Hello. Can you please go back to your Ecopedagogy article, which you helped create, and re-write it using language appropriate to a general audience? The terms you are using are far too technical, and as a result the article is generally incomprehensible.
Also, you may want to edit your Richard V. Kahn and Steven Best articles to provide more proof of their notability (see WP:N and WP:BIO for help with that). As it stands, I don't think those articles will survive a deletion review. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad ( talk) 16:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
The article Douglas Kellner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Mdann
52
talk to me!
13:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)