Restimp ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Blocked because of an edit war here and here started not by me. I ask for a revision of this block and because Wikipedia start a neutral investigation on it
Decline reason:
This account was blocked for sockpuppetry. An unblock request must be made from your original account. Favonian ( talk) 16:26, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please stop. This is now the fifth account of yours that has been blocked for abusive use of alternate accounts. See the message at User talk:Larastabata. Risker ( talk) 13:09, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
As I'm a living person and not a disposable wikipedia user, I think i worth a reply. Instead of follow an impossible hunt on existent or non-existent sock, why someone in the English Wikipedia check the edit war started at the page? Why someone, aware of the historical matter and the many cited references, try to examine the voice in a historical, civil and neutral way? Thanks for a polite reply.-- Restimp ( talk) 14:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)