![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Thanks for uploading File:The Wallflowers Heroes cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | |||
Hi ResolutionsPerMinute, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, ( t · c) buidhe 00:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, do you think you could add some sources to article for me? I have a lot of editing to do and could really use some help with it and would be very thankful to get some help. Davidgoodheart ( talk) 18:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry to also raise this here (I didn't want you to think my reply on the record charts talk was only directed at HumanxAnthro), but you've also claimed that Finland's chart is sales only. Where is this from? Are you just taking what HumanxAnthro has claimed as fact? There's no chance that the current chart is sales only. The current chart published by ifpi.fi (week 24) [1] pretty closely matches what's popular on Spotify [2]. I'm not doubting it could have once been true, but HumanxAnthro is not just replacing the Finnish chart from the 2000s or 1990s. They've also been replacing artists whose careers began in the 2010s (like Alma) with the three metrics from the PDF, claiming that the sales chart from the PDF "perfectly" matches what finnishcharts.com archives, which is clearly untrue. Ss 112 05:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi RPM. I'm quite confused regarding this edit of yours. You do know the current standards of Template:Infobox song (and album) recommend the listing of names and items in the infobox with bullet points, right? The documentation for one or both of the infoboxes states commas are acceptable for a couple of items, but not when we have more than that, like four names. I was modernising the formatting on that article and I'm surprised to see you "restore" something the infobox no longer recommends doing. Ss 112 11:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Thank you for your edits to " Don't Hold Your Breath". I made one small change to your edit(s), namely removing the unsourced tag. At a number of good article and featured article reviews, it has been deemed that where there is a phsyical copy of the a song or album, said release serves as the source and an online retail source is not required. This is backed up by WP:VENDOR which discourages the inclusion of retail/e-commerce sources. As a lot of songs and singles are only issued digitally this excludes huge amounts of potential songs from ever having a "reliably sourced" track listing section. Plus the action release is a medium of its own and therefore self-sourced. Hope that makes sense! ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 12:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi ResolutionsPerMinute, hope you're doing well, I've seen that reverted my edit for a chart in the Somewhere I Belong article, and u said the LP3 chart is compiled through votes not sales/airplay/etc. But isn't it through those votes the songs would air in the radio? At least that what it said in the LP3 article. And to my knowledge that's how the methodology of airplay works, or is there something else I don't know? Moh8213 ( talk) 15:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
covers sales or broadcast outlets from multiple sources. LP3 is not compiling its chart through multiple sources; it is compiling information based on the opinions of a limited group of people. ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 15:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Alright, thanks for clearing things up. Moh8213 ( talk) 15:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Okay, but then there's also this release to rock radio: [3] My apologies for missing that table. I did not know that had been added. dannymusiceditor oops 04:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
On 19 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lately (Divine song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Divine's song " Lately" topped the Billboard Hot 100 in 1998, it became the first number-one single for the performers, the songwriters, the producers, and the record labels? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lately (Divine song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Lately (Divine song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Do not merge tables if peaks are different years. We add highest peaks by year so you know when song peaked in each country. Eurohunter ( talk) 13:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The recording date of this song can be inferred from:
/info/en/?search=No_Angel
/info/en/?search=Sliding_Doors
The information isn't sourced there, so it isn't sourced in my edit either. BunningGrade ( talk) 21:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
I've noticed that you've undone all my edits without any good reason, the reason why I've decided to remove the scottish charts is that because Scotland is a nation part of the United Kingdom, Scotland isn't a country and the UK Singles Chart covers the whole of the UK including England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. 82.19.124.151 ( talk) 11:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 82.19.124.151 ( talk) 11:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Perhaps instead of reverting someone else's work for lack of citation, you could add the { {Citation needed} } template. That is the whole reason that template exists.
If you are concerned that it will end up never being corrected with that template, you could also reach out to the content creator and let them know it needs a citation. If they don't add a citation in a reasonable amount of time (a couple of weeks would be nice since some of us work full time), then it could be reverted.
Epolk ( talk) 20:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
I wanted to write to you before reverting your change about the music video upload on YouTube to give context to my choice. First, on other pages of the same artist, the date of the YouTube upload of music videos is written in the dedicated paragraph. It is fair since Garbage use YouTube (and in the past has used VEVO) to make their videos available to watch. Secondly, "The World Is Not Enough" is one of the videos that for many years has only been available on the Geffen compilation Absolute Garbage, due to legal ties. So, yes, it's pertinent to write that the video has been uploaded officially by the band on their YouTube channel for the first time, as it isn't available anywhere else. Moreover, it ties with the digital single reissue, the Royal Albert Hall performance and the promotion of the new greatest hits album Anthology. Anyway, let me know what you think about this. Vitaazerokelvin ( talk) 07:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
To answer your question, I copied the article to my sandbox back in May and must have missed your edits when I officially started expanding last week. No harm intended and I apologize if I caused annoyance. – zmbro ( talk) ( cont) 16:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
How is this edit constructive? How is anything that I did " hypocritical"? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 23:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
So I should not use the Radio Disney Top 30 chart to support statements about specific chart positions or weeks-on, should not create or maintain "List of number-one hits on the Radio Disney Top 30" articles, and should not include it in discography listings as a record chart; I should use the chart solely to support statements about airplay on RD? Jamgorham ( talk) 03:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello. In this edit of the Kate Bush song you added a reference to a Guardian article, but the link you added does not go to any article which substantiates your statement that they rated it 14th best UK no. one. Do you still have or know the actual link needed? I'm going to take out the reference as it is, but it would be nice to have the correct one to put back before removing the statement as well.... Thanks. Happy days ~ Lindsay H ello 10:41, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
User Progrock70s has been blocked for 1 day by user Materialscientist. When blocked, he started to use multiple Iranian IPs to do genre warring edits on Thin Lizzy albums pages. He cannot accept that genres should be discussed on the talk page first to be added later. He usually provides unreliable or poor quality sources (Discogs, Allmusic genres in the sidebar...) He was blocked by user Materialscientist on 25 December 2022, 7:52. The block lasted 31 hours. When blocked, he started using different Iranian IPs to do genre warring edits on Thin Lizzy albums pages 2804:1054:401B:E400:4CFD:1F7D:489F:3D5E ( talk) 09:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
ResolutionsPerMinute,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
22:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 22:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Right, firstly I found the song which appeared on Fully Booked in 1995 on YouTube website and Tina's only appearance on Fully Booked in 1995 where she made only one appearance that year. Hope this helps. 82.19.124.151 ( talk) 23:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 82.19.124.151 ( talk) 23:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey ya mate. Please listen: I've seen plenty of articles here which use Allmusic as a source for the genre of a song, so I don't really understand why this "rule" should apply to some cases, and to others no. Moreover, there's not a magazine article about every song ever written; and given there were, who tells us they're always more accurate and reliable than Allmusic? If tomorrow I opened a fanzine, would I be able to write whatever I want in it, list it as a source and would it be considered reliable? (I am giving an example ad absurdum just to make things clear). Other important things are listening, knowledge of contemporary music genres, using logic, and experience. And sometimes, that's enough to figure out a song's genre; listening to the songs I added genres to, you can usually recognize that the genres listed on Allmusic mostly correspond. But even putting this aside, please let me say again: why are Allmusic et similia considered reliable sometimes, and other times no? The rule does apply to all cases, or it does to none. That said, I kindly ask you not to remove the genres I added, unless you can tell they're the wrong ones, and in this case I will accept your editing with no problem at all. Have a nice day! :) 62.11.235.115 ( talk) 16:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
AllMusic's genre sidebar should be avoided.Just because it's sourced on other articles doesn't mean it's okay to use. That's not how consensus works. Call me a square, but I follow the rules. If you don't want to follow them, that's your problem, but it's eventually going to come back to bite you. So no, if you source AllMusic's sidebar, I will revert it. You can guarantee that! :) ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 16:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
I know this is a minor issue, but I have 2 questions:
1. Why is having no citations better than citing Discogs? I understand that Discogs is considered 'unreliable', and I don't think I've cited it directly in the time since then (I have occasionally used "cite AV media notes" with a URL to the images on Discogs, like on citation [1] on So Fresh), but the Discogs citations at least provided some form of evidence for the song's original title, original album appearance and the track listings, whereas now there's nothing. In fact, you added extra pieces of uncited information with the "3:41 (radio edit)" and the 2003 German release in the release history table.
2. Can you show me where Zobbel is considered unreliable, if it is? I've searched and haven't found anything conclusive. The closest I found was this discussion on your talk page: User talk:ResolutionsPerMinute/Archive 1#There are Template:Single chart and Template:Album chart entries for zobbel.de, yet you're telling users not to use it?, which sounds like it's just your preference against the site, not a consensus, which I wouldn't think is grounds for removing it. Regarding the discrepancy you mentioned there with "Real World" though, I'm pretty sure the reason is that there are 2 versions of the UK singles chart from 1994 to 2001 - a "compressed" one which removed singles below #75 after they'd dropped at a certain rate, and an "uncompressed" one that included all of them - and Zobbel uses the "uncompressed" version whereas the OCC, when they added full top 100s to their website, decided to use the "compressed" version. Zobbel explains it here (in points 1 and 2): https://zobbel.de/cluk/CLUK_00F.HTM
Thanks in advance. I do really appreciate your work on here, particularly with compiling US radio release dates from Radio & Records and the like which I find very useful. Exallonyx ( talk) 01:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I appreciate you pointing out that the content I reintroduced was unsourced, I do apologize for putting that back in there. I have reintroduced another part of my edit (it doesn't involve sources, however: see my edit summary and the revision itself for specifics), but I do thank you for undoing the rest of my edit. I didn't see an edit summary about the removal of that specific content (when you moved the IPC content to its own section), so I thought it would be OK to reintroduce it. I now see that I was mistaken, and I thank you for correcting my error. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 21:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi in this edit to No Distance Left to Run, and again in this edit to Tender (song), you introduced an sfn reference "Power 2013". Unfortunately you did not define the reference. This means that nobody can look it up, and adds the articles to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you coul dfix them that would be great. DuncanHill ( talk) 16:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Just Say You Didn't Played The Game. Thank You. OGBadDogg ( talk) 19:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Good day. I noticed that you reverted my edit that removed the italics for Pro Bowl on the article " Can I Go Now".
However, bowl games are not to be italicized because they are not considered major works: MOS:MAJORWORK. Furthermore, Pro Bowl is not italicized on its own article page, nor is it combined as one word.
I'm going to change it back and add a space in. Thanks for your time. Kirby777 ( talk) 23:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
I received message on my talk page about Skyfall (song). I don't know why you reverted the edits, the coding is incorrect on the page, perhaps take a look at the revert please and undo, because the article is now incomplete again. Cltjames ( talk) 11:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey RPM! Since we worked on Nobody Wants to Be Alone, are you interested in working on some Latin crossover songs from the late 1990s and early 2000s song? By crossover, I mean songs that have both an English and Spanish version. This is part of my personal project on working on songs that reached #1 on the Latin Pop Airplay and Tropical Airplay charts. So it would be songs like Rhythm Divine, You Sang to Me, and even Come On Over Baby (All I Want Is You). Erick ( talk) 16:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey RPM. I don't think you're aware considering your recent additions of the template, but using Template:Cite AV media notes with the others= param requires you also use the author= param, otherwise it causes a maintenance error message when previewing the page. (Generally whomever wrote the liner notes/the label itself.) Or, alternatively, you can not include the others= param and it gets rid of the maintenance error with or without an author= param present. Ss 112 09:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Everywhere (Michelle Branch song) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The article
Everywhere (Michelle Branch song) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Everywhere (Michelle Branch song) and
Talk:Everywhere (Michelle Branch song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
19:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The article
Everywhere (Michelle Branch song) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Everywhere (Michelle Branch song) for comments about the article, and
Talk:Everywhere (Michelle Branch song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
17:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi ResolutionsPerMinute, I've wrote an article about the song Rain in May by Dutch singer Max Werner. It's on /info/en/?search=Draft:Rain_in_May Can you look over my Draft? My English is not so well, but I hope you can help me with the article. Best regards Backto80s ( talk) 01:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have made a report of that disruptive IP editor on Celine Dion song articles over at the Wikipedia edit warring noticeboard, see this thread. It focusses on the I'm Alive article where the history of disruptive edits / edit war is the most extensive. Thanks. — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Okay, I admit I did not see a label to confirm that they weren't. Sorry. Zigwithbag ( talk) 18:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello ResolutionsPerMinute!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, regarding this edit [7] a lot of times if I remove a certain chart as I previously did because a chart was WP:OVER200 the entire box will become uneven and out of place. I truly have no idea why, but once I remove the columns it’ll go back to normal. I think this is twice now that you’ve questioned this on your edit summary towards me. I’m not sure if you’re able to give some insight on this or not but I figured I’d reach out. Pillowdelight ( talk) 01:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
on Drift Away, so will you please give me 13 more minutes? Carptrash ( talk) 16:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
an annoying user keeps removing the same sourced genre, in this case nu metal, without starting a discussion on the talk page. Now he's questioning the reliability of the source, Metal Hammer, which is considered reliable per WP:MUSICRS. They've already been warned that they need to start a discussion first but apparently they don't respect it. SpaceHelmetX1 ( talk) 05:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Maria Maria you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Adog --
Adog (
talk)
05:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
This GAN you co-nominated is now on hold with comments at the review page. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Maria Maria you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Maria Maria for comments about the article, and
Talk:Maria Maria/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Adog --
Adog (
talk)
03:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Gimme More has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Brachy08 (Talk) 01:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Can I ask you why did you revert my edits on the Erasure singles pages? Individual items are split using the {{hlist}}
template and/or the "*" marker on most of the pages on the wiki. I also corrected the "synthpop" form to avoid redirects and somehow tried to fix the typography on some of the track listing sections, as well as removing some of the now-pointless {{DEFAULTSORT}}
mark-up. At least you could have properly checked my edits before reverting them for no reason.
8086-PC (
talk)
13:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
{{hlist}}
template with bullet points yourself on some of the pages. I just feel that I wasted all my free time I had yesterday that I spent on trying to fix the pages at least a little bit.
8086-PC (
talk)
13:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Bro A Thousand Miles was recorded in 2001. She originally released it but re-released it in 2002 💀 Young Chove 15 ( talk) 23:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
I see the page which says “adds September 15” but then the date seems to have switched considering it says in another paper that it “impacts radio and top 40 on rhythm crossover September 28”. I know the Lady Marmalade one i was wrong, that definitely was April 10 but I think the Britney one is actually not September 15, It’s the 28th of September. Just checking with you and any feedback is helpful. Also didn’t realize it was Radio and Records either, which is US, I thought it was Music Week. Jjjjfghh ( talk) 20:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
No need for the rudeness and abrupt nature that you attached to your reversion over at Medusa. Consider your tone and how it comes across in the future. Thanks. Goodreg3 ( talk) 00:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Might I suggest if you have no administrator rights and have 'no intention' of gaining them, that you get off your high horse, stop sending threatening messages on people's talk pages that add up to the square root of jack shite and sit dafuque down. Don't quite know just who you think you are speaking to. 2A02:C7C:DB33:8300:31AF:B05D:CF46:AD52 ( talk) 20:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Interestingly, I noticed after I wrote this that you're a professional at pissing everyone off. Get a job.
Don't you start playing the victim with me, you're the one that started this by putting big boy templates on my page. Seems like you have a habit of putting yi high heels on and lecturing everyone all about the shop, then playing the victim, classic sort of person who can dish it out but can't take it. Get shot of yoursel ye nettie Yank. I am from Scotland, we take no shite from ne one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:DB33:8300:31AF:B05D:CF46:AD52 ( talk) 20:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi ResolutionsPerMinute, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 18:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
You're 100% right, I skimmed and thought the chart performance was regarding Bega's song. Entirely my fault, Dialmayo ( talk) ( Contribs) she/her 20:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
I saw about Come In Out of the Rain (song), you are right since both Audio and Music Video are same length.
But what about Kenny G Silhouette (Kenny G instrumental) & Songbird (Kenny G composition)? Both songs the music videos are shorter than full length audio. Keep both or keep either one? --- Cat12zu3 ( talk) 13:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
oh I see...<refname> not <ref>...I not sure/can't get to make to link reference to the hardcoded Template talk:Certification Table Entry and ( initially ask about an apostrophe title search error in template talk
(Michael Bolton "something of a modern pop standard" & recorded instrumental variously by different instruments were already there before I came, and I think also could be at below section and not in intro)
well, as an ?obsolete? former HTML3/ HTML 4.0 webmaster...I'm felt, not as "old" (although do have 3 health issues), but felt kinda strange feeling becuase I still have all my soft toys Hello Kitty, Ty Beanie Babies, etc and really want <<to be young>> and ?not obsoleted?. (And not very blunt like Special:Diff/1183449094 Special:Diff/1183231064 ( Tsugunai (song)) (also see that word demise are used too in very recently Steampunk (comics), Naruto: Shippuden (season 18), Stefanie Sun, or the past Tsugunai (song) Amrita Chaudhry, Codex Eyckensis).
--- Cat12zu3 ( talk) 03:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I see that you put back in the dead links. Can you please let me know why? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 03:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your clarification as well as for your correction. It definitely helps me out to become a better editor, as well as to balance some concepts better. LaxusIRL ( talk) 15:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
You pulled out an entry on Amnesia_(Chumbawamba_song)#Track_listings with the note "no promos"; fair enough, but that CD has two official remixes not otherwise mentioned on the page. Is there a way those could be catalogued/documented without breaking policy? Apologies if I'm not going about this the right way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.91.13.119 ( talk) 21:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
I see you're the biggest contributor to Zombie (The Cranberries song). I stumbled upon the article, found it very high quality and after one edit to source unreferenced claims, nominated it for the GA. Thought would be no issue, specially considering how long people show up to review, but just as it was picked up it was erased for being a drive-by. Do you see any issue with my involvement, or find anything lacking on the page? (in any case, it could be renominated) igordebraga ≠ 00:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)