![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hey again! Just created an article for "R U Ready", lead single from Salt-N-Pepa's last album. Hope I'm not bothering you by asking for your help in adding additional charts :) QuestFour ( talk) 19:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed some changes to the short descriptions for song articles. According to WP:SHORTDESC, a short description should be "a concise explanation of the scope of the page". Often, articles are about various aspects of a song and not solely about one single commercial release. For example, Boom Boom (John Lee Hooker song) was changed to "1962 single by John Lee Hooker". This description ignores the fact that the article discusses recordings by other artists. A better short description (with emphasis on short) would be "blues song written by John Lee Hooker", "blues song first recorded by John Le Hooker in 1962", or simply " blues standard" (as it was). Similarly, for Come Together, the short description was changed to "1969 single by the Beatles", but the article discusses various versions including popular ones by Tina Turner and Aerosmith. To be more accurate, the description should not be restricted to one single; identifying the writers or "rock song first recorded by the Beatles in 1969" is one easy way to avoid an overly long description, but still be correct. Separate composers and lyricists are often not identified for popular music, so the broader "writer" is used to include both (although some descriptions have been incorrectly changed to "written and composed by" when only one person is identified). If you have any questions, please ping me. Thanks, — Ojorojo ( talk) 19:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Greetings! Just created this one, could you please add the charts and expand it (eg. track listings and formats)? I'm kind of embarrassed as I think I'm the only one in your talk page requesting things like this...appreciate you doing it even though you don't have to, and a million thanks for your work here :) QuestFour ( talk) 16:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for adding Iceland charts. It seems you have added Icelnad Year-end charts for 97, 98 and 2000. Do you have sources (links) for other years? I'm most interested in years 1994, 95, 96, 99, 2002, 03 and 04. Thanks in advance -- Max24 (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! an editor just added the US year-end charts for OK Computer, could you please add the remaining charts from the other countries? Ellokk ( talk) 22:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi again :) On the 1997 Iceland Year-end Singles Chart there is Celine Dion's "I Love You" at #21. Do you know what was the peak position of this song on the weekly chart? Or is it a mistake (it wasn't a single in other countries). Thanks in advance, Max :) -- Max24 (talk) 18:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Please see this discussion. Bionic ( talk) 07:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Please see this discussion. Bionic ( talk) 07:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi ResolutionsPerMinute! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello, I tried to source release dates for articles such as Running with Scissors ("Weird Al" Yankovic album), but User:Gen.Quon is arguing that linking the PDF for magazines violates WP:COPYVIO. Please try to respond. Thanks. 2603:8081:160A:BE2A:BC32:2EC5:83C5:B878 ( talk) 22:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
cite magazine}}
template.
ResPM
come to my window
22:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)I took it to the Teahouse. Can you try to discuss with them if you can? 2603:8081:160A:BE2A:BC32:2EC5:83C5:B878 ( talk) 22:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
For The Impression That I Get, User:QuestFour is arguing that the release date should be the commercial release date and not the date for radio airplay per Template:Infobox_song#released. I have tried to discuss this with them and they are not putting a source. Please try to discuss with them. 2603:8081:160A:BE2A:44DA:8FC:B24B:70B4 ( talk) 22:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, User:Angryjoe111 keeps removing citations from infoboxes regarding the release dates of various N'Sync related articles (i.e. No Strings Attached).I had tried to discuss with them. Please try to discuss with them if you can. Thank you. 2603:8081:160A:BE2A:BCAE:63F:A7D2:B29B ( talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. The discussion of release dates in the infobox has primarily been based on the song's first physical release according to several WP:GA reviewers, and has been disputable among promotional songs eventually released as singles such as " It's Gonna Be Me". The date the user added was the Billboard magazine publishing date, not the song's radio release. I added the earliest CD single date from the UK but is attributed to its release on Amazon, while the US physical release date was acknowledged in two separate Billboard issues and what led to its number one peak on the Billboard Hot 100. Should I use the UK date in the |released= parameter since it was the earliest reported physical release, or should I use the US date since it caused the number one peak?
Thanks for uploading File:JamesWaltzingAlongsongcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Sorry for the late reply but I just saw your message. I was able to find 2005 and 2006 YECs so far.
Just download the attachment at the bottom of the page and you’ll be able to see the Year End Charts. Lorenzoact ( talk) 19:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for picking that up. Didn't realize my keyboard had autocorrected the date. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 00:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi – I'm puzzled by your edit here... I have a copy of Music Week's 1997 year-end charts, and it definitely has Backstreet Boys at no. 38 and Robbie Williams at no. 39... where are you getting your information from? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
He Liked to Feel It you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
07:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The article
He Liked to Feel It you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:He Liked to Feel It for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
09:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The article
He Liked to Feel It you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:He Liked to Feel It for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
19:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Destiny (Zero 7 song) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
10:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
The article
Destiny (Zero 7 song) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Destiny (Zero 7 song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
16:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
The article
Destiny (Zero 7 song) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Destiny (Zero 7 song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
17:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
JCB (song) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
08:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to
visit the Participants Page! |
آرمین هویدایی ( talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
The article
JCB (song) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:JCB (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
16:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The article
JCB (song) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:JCB (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
20:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for a information and topic about it. Now, everything is clear and I understand it. I thought that the LP3 is the same as the other charts in articles about songs, but now it's clear to me, that it's not the same. Thanks your quoting a link about it, I read it and it's helpful for me. Thanks for a note about it. Maybe I can help you in deleting it from many songs where I wrote about it?-- Takoden ( talk) 03:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Sing (Travis song) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
20:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The article
Sing (Travis song) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Sing (Travis song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
13:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The article
Sing (Travis song) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Sing (Travis song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
08:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey! I just wanted to say first of all, thank you so much for all of your hard work in adding release dates. Your finds have been INCREDIBLE! That's pretty much all I do here on Wikipedia these days because it can be very difficult to source these things and a lot of users don't really bother putting energy into finding them, so it's so great to see another editor adding them as well! Secondly, I was wondering if you could find and add the release dates for Pink's I'm Not Dead singles in Australia. — Status ( talk · contribs) 17:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Nice to meet you. I do not understand why you reversed my edit. I was only trying to make the page look tidier (as well as adding some new information); I think that quotation marks should only be used for exactly that: quotations - and not to highlight or place emphasis on a word or title.
Anyway, I do not want to argue over something as ridiculous as this, so I wish you well and I hope you carry on being a good Wikipedia editor. Gregwholikestrains ( talk) 02:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
That's okay, but I disagree with you here on the use of quotation marks. I think that italicising the name of something places emphasis on it without making the page look untidy. I'm quite thorough with grammar and punctuation, and seeing quotation marks used for words and sentences that are not being quoted, really annoys me. Bold and/or italic font is enough.
I was not using the definite article (the) in the middle of the sentence, but using it as part of the band's title; so therefore it is a proper noun, e.g. The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Who, The Stone Roses, The Verve, The Seahorses etc.
Also, regarding my lack of a citation, well, I cannot see any other citations within that opening paragraph, so I do not know what the problem is. If you are a Stone Roses, Seahorses or John Squire fan (or indeed someone who appreciates good music), then you will know that what I have said is true and therefore I do not believe that a citation is necessary for such a trivial piece of information.
I just want to end this by saying that I have seen the front of your profile; I have Aspergers Syndrome too. I do not wish to cause a row or risk having my account blocked, but it clearlt seems that I have brought a knife to a gun fight here. If you don't want to accept my constructive changes then that's up to you, but I would not have made these changes if I did not think them necessary; I am not one of these people who vandalise pages just for a laugh. I can accept that you want to keep the page formatting as it is, but not the fact you will not accept my information without a citation.
Good day. Gregwholikestrains ( talk) 12:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
That is stupid. Gregwholikestrains ( talk) 21:04, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
On 28 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sing (Travis song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while performing their song " Sing" on Top of the Pops, Scottish band Travis engaged in a pie fight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sing (Travis song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Sing (Travis song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi RPM,
I'm not a regular Wikipedia contributor, but am a massive fan of your input to the UK chart sections of songs. I have been researching year-end singles charts and have found myself frustrated at the lack of available information for the 1990s: can I ask how many Music Week editions you have with 90s year-end charts, and if you could share the top 100 data for these years?
Kind regards,
Ben :) 83.244.233.102 ( talk) 03:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Oh wonderful, thanks so much! You and Richard3120 fight the good fight :)
Hi ResolutionsPerMinute, I saw that you removed the "Rock" genre I had tagged for this song--stating that a nomination for a Rock grammy, does not make the song a rock song. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, could you point me in the direction of some specific guidelines on genre? Being that the Grammy awards are governed by the RIAA, I would imagine that a major nomination would be enough of a governing body to suggest a style of music, particular since none was listed. Please advise me on how I can offer proof of genre. -- UnsungHeroWiki ( talk) 22:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
@ResolutionsPerMinute Gotcha! I see what you mean about genre. So I need to find a reference to that song's genre from one of the "Generally Reliable Sources" listed? Is it enough if a reliable source (that is on the list) refers to it as a general "rock" track--or do I need to find a source that cites one of the more specific sub-genres you mentioned (alternative rock, roots rock, etc)? From what you're saying I gather that is preferential to have a more descriptive sub-genre cited, but in cases where a citation to that sub-genre can't be found -- is it better to leave the Genre blank than cite such an over-encompassing genre like "Rock"? Thanks for your response and your help! UnsungHeroWiki ( talk) 23:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
reply to|Username}}
template or one of its redirects :).
ResPM (
T🔈
🎵C)
00:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Thanks RPM, I appreciate you taking the time to help me out! I checked out your user page, and those useful links you have there will be helpful for me. My focus on Wiki is to improve some music articles for bands or songs. I'll be sure to tread lightly until I get the hang of things :) All the best! UnsungHeroWiki ( talk) 00:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, I was going through the charts for " Doctor Pressure" and noticed that the Finland template is broken. I attempted to fix it using the manually searched page as a reference but could not replicate it with the template parameters. If you are available, can you see if this can be resolved? Thanks. — Angryjoe1111 ( talk) 08:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi there- thanks for your edit, I found it very helpful and you had so much better info to add. I have a hard time interpreting instructions on Wikipedia (have also tried using YouTube for this) so I learn most through example (and clearly some trial and error). I used the next song on the album as my example when attempting to bulk it up. See here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girls_%26_Boys_(Good_Charlotte_song) Should the info about movie release be removed there as well? Thank you again. NuttMerg ( talk) 19:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Soak Up the Sun you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
14:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
The article
Soak Up the Sun you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Soak Up the Sun for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
20:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
I want to thank you for creating or expanding articles for songs I'm very fond of! I'm thinking songs like Bamboogie, Operation Blade, My Vision, Everybody Gonfi-Gon, Bring Me Edelweiss, You Were Right, Loco, Compliments on Your Kiss among others. I'm a fellow autistic Now UK fan (my collection mostly grew in the 2000s and I have each edition up to 85; very much a specialist interest of mine) and wish OB and BME had featured on them. -- TangoTizerWolfstone ( talk) 10:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC) |
The article
Soak Up the Sun you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Soak Up the Sun for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
19:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Regarding this edit of yours, the release date you indicated was Monday, May 1, 2006. Most major-label singles are released on Tuesday in the US. Also, there's one typo in the year, which brings me here to ask for another look at the source material which you cited but which is offline.
For " But It's Better If You Do", RIAA Gold and Platinum report the release date as May 16, a Tuesday. What do you think? Binksternet ( talk) 17:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know that I have replied to your request on my talk page. Nqr9 ( talk) 23:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I admire your work. I have just looked into the Billie Piper page, and was looking for information about the Poppets adverts she did circa 1998 (in TV and as the back cover Ad on Smash Hits) I can’t seem to find anything at all, I’d really love to know if you recall these, maybe I’m making it up? 😅 I’d really love to hear from you, will check back in a week or so 🙂 86.5.243.61 ( talk) 20:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
In several articles, you have removed genres from music templates on the grounds that they aren't sourced, but you never replace them with genres that are sourced. Why? 47.36.25.163 ( talk) 02:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
@resolutionsperminute Hello! I really want to addd a userbox list with scrolling like yours would you be yas with providing that code? ChromiumOverload ( talk) 16:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I think your user signiture is really cool and i was wondering if you could post it on my user page so i can make some changes and set it up for myself. ChromiumOverload ( talk) 04:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Run Away (I Wanna Be with U), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run Away (I Wanna Be with U) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I've just noticed that you added release history sections to several Bee Gees song articles last year, and perhaps a variety of other music artists' articles as well, and formatted dates using Template:Start date. Per the template's documentation, it is only for use inside infoboxes and other places where it emits microformats. Otherwise it is a misuse. If you've introduced it to a range of other articles, please consider removing it if you go back to edit those articles and notice it there. There are other templates that can format dates automatically, but this one should not be used outside of infoboxes. Thank you. Ss 112 06:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
I Wanna Be Bad you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
10:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
I Wanna Be Bad you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:I Wanna Be Bad for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
11:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
I Wanna Be Bad you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:I Wanna Be Bad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kyle Peake --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
08:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
|
Thanks, with the cover link the hampsterdance page makes sense now :) Dany0 ( talk) 16:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Imitation of Life (song) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GhostRiver --
GhostRiver (
talk)
21:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Imitation of Life (song) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Imitation of Life (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GhostRiver --
GhostRiver (
talk)
22:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
The article
Imitation of Life (song) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Imitation of Life (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GhostRiver --
GhostRiver (
talk)
17:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
why couldnt i edit nellys over and over to say that it a r&b track — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipf95 ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Brilliant work on the Shoop Shoop article! Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 18:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC) |
I just added content on their covers section when i found out about the song, i was wondering what it needed for it not to be removed. Tennisfanrf ( talk) 22:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I just noticed your post on HumanxAnthro's talk page late last month. You do realise that zobbel.de has both a Template:Single chart and Template:Album chart entry citing the site, right? Which certainly seems to indicate some users in the past have considered its data reliable enough to cite. I'm of the opinion that until you lobby to get that removed and zobbel.de placed on the websites to avoid list, it's not a binding consensus nor broadly considered unreliable. As noted in one of the discussions you linked to, it republished data only available to UKChartsPlus subscribers, which is helpful, "personal blog" or not. This discussion has no consensus, and this is the opinion of two editors, which is still not a consensus. I think you should start an RfC or neutrally worded discussion to get a consensus instead of instructing users not to use it before there is one. Thanks. Ss 112 20:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
A California-based live audio engineer called Michael "Bink" Knowles, known as Binksternet on Wikipedia, keeps taking out the Hale and Pace programme Oddbods from their article as he doesn't like the references from the BBC provided...can you find any better info/refs about this show? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.173.56 ( talk) 17:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)