Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
William III of England. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Accurizer (
talk)
22:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Some of your recent to
Dutch Revolt, have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek
consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Objections have been raised about your rather one-sided editing with unsourced material distorting the article with religious bias. Please restore to the original version and engage in te discussion on the Talk page. Thank you ...
DonCalo (
talk)
14:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Dutch Revolt. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian ( talk) 19:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
The additions that I have made to the article on the Dutch Revolt are common knowledge in advanced levels of Reformation history, as I teach the subject at a Master's and Seminary level. I tried to be brief by including the most important reformers involved and the documents used to promote the Dutch Revolt. To leave them out is absurd. The article, without my brief additions, was terribly weak and superficial, and without proper context to the Reformation. There are a significant number of other additions that could be made in the future, as the article showed beforehand a mere high-school level of understanding of the Dutch Revolt. With my additions, there are now also links to the biographical articles, the Confessional documents, and to the larger context of the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century. Thanks
Hello, I'm
DonCalo. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
User talk:DonCalo#The_Dutch_Revolt that didn't seem very
civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please refrain from personal attacks.
DonCalo (
talk)
14:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Puritans under King Charles I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Elizabeth ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Orphan Wiki. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
History of the Puritans under King James I seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Orphan Wiki
19:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
History of the Puritans under King James I. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Melcous (
talk)
06:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
History of the Puritans under King James I, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
—SerialNumber54129
paranoia /
cheap sh*t room
19:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Melcous, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
This edit: I don't know who you were talking to, but you've been leaving similar remarks to editors in various places. The level of arrogance and uncollegiality is totally inappropriate in a collaborative project, and it is coupled by an obvious lack of understanding of what Wikipedia is and how it operates. What I see here is a page full of comments by other editors left over a period of a half a year, and the only kind of communication you offer is
this kind (a remark similar to the ones you are leaving now, but a half a year ago to
DonCalo), full of personal attacks and snide remarks.
I see no talk page communication, no edit summaries--nothing that indicates that you even understand that this is a collaborative project. Drmies ( talk) 21:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
01:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)