![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Star Trek Klingon stories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Trek Klingon stories until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DARTHBOTTO talk• cont 23:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Star Trek Vulcan stories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Trek Vulcan stories until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DARTHBOTTO talk• cont 00:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Maggard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Maggard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 14:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eddie Van Halen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pasadena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Splyce logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:CAMELCASE. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:CAMELCASE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 13:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alliance (eSports), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearthstone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on AXiomatic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix ( talk) 00:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Han Taiwanese, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yongding, Dapu and Wuhua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Aliiance esports.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The article British independence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mutt Lunker (
talk)
01:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British independence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British independence (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 20:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, friendly reminder that you placed an RfD tag on Taiwan Region, however, it was not listed at RfD, I have retargeted it to Taiwan (disambiguation) per the outcome of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_September_3#Taiwan_region. However, if you feel that this one needed to be handled differently, please let me know. - Champion ( talk) ( contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 07:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on British independence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 09:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on British independence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mutt Lunker ( talk) 06:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Damn you, I had three good goes at trying to !vote a delete that at RfD, every time an edit conflict. Glad that it has gone, been away for a few days and hadn't checked the discussions etc. This was my last. I don't quite do justice to Alf Garnett but I thought was quite good.
I am looking for some sources regarding Deathmatch Classic, one of the first Valve mods, the issue is that the term "Deathmatch Classic" often refers to a mode of FPS, do you have a better method of searching for source? Valoem talk contrib 07:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
The tag to use when you want one of your own sub-pages deleted is {{ db-user}} or {{ db-u1}} - more specific than {{ delete}}, and saves the admin a little work as he can see at once what's going on and does not need to check the history. JohnCD ( talk) 21:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AD Carry. Since you had some involvement with the AD Carry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DGG ( talk ) 00:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Krzysztof Szczygieł. Since you had some involvement with the Krzysztof Szczygieł redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
The article Angel Munos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Montanabw
(talk)
01:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 ( talk · contribs · email)
![]() Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time. The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to
our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
When proposing an article for deletion, please use the text {{subst:Proposed deletion|1=Your reason for deletion.}} That will produce a properly dated Proposed deletion tag on the article. For further guidance, see WP:Proposed deletion. Thanks. Safiel ( talk) 21:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry to see that after your derailing the speedy deletion nomination of the Boyz After Money Always article, you could not be arsed to get involved in the AfD, one way or another. It's really not very helpful of you, a sort of sociopathic and inconsiderate making of work for other people whilst you wander away. I'd be grateful if you'd put a little more thought into your actions before repeating this sort of trick: and on this article, I think you owe it to the community to get off the fence on whichever side your research suggests to you. -- Tagishsimon (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, would you be open to creating guidelines for Chinese surnames along with others?
I'd like all the Chinese surnames consistent but I don't really know how to establish a consistent pattern throughout Wikipedia Opacitatic ( talk) 23:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Infobox school. Since you had some involvement with the Infobox school redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Prisencolin. When categories are added, citations are always required in the text to show the same. For example, in the case of Carmit Bachar, where you added Category:American people of Hoklo descent, there are no citations to show that the subject is of Hoklo descent. We also cannot assume it simply because many Indonesian Chinese are of Hokkien descent - that would be WP:OR. The essential thing is that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and we hold stuff to an academic standard here. Before adding a category, try finding a citation. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 07:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dialect groups. Since you had some involvement with the Dialect groups redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 08:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindi version is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindi version until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 21:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Prisencolin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
There is already a list of foods that were exchanged at the main Columbian exchange article. This seems like the monumental undertaking, and I'm wondering if it gets into WP:NOTDIR territory. -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American occupation of the United States. Since you had some involvement with the American occupation of the United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Prisencolin. I have used the 'undo' function to revert your recent edit redirecting Chinese people to Han Chinese. If you think the article is unnecessary or harmful, deletion via AfD would be a more appropriate course of action, I think. From my point of view, the meaning of "Chinese people" only partially overlaps the meaning of Han, as the former term is used variously to refer to the ethnic group, citizens of China (PRC or ROC), or various other meanings. Happy editing, Cnilep ( talk) 23:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I have closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 September 14#Category:São Paulo (city). Please would you now nominate the sub-categories, tagging them with {{ cfr-speedy}} and listing them at WP:CFDS per C2C, citing the full CFD decision? – Fayenatic L ondon 13:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CompLexity Gaming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompLexity Gaming until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. {MordeKyle} ☢ 23:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that I've removed the WP:SPLIT nomination that you placed on Team SoloMid. It has been three months since the nomination, and there has been no discussion on the subject. If you want to re-add the split nomination, please feel free to do so. I only ask that you also start a discussion on the talk page for the article as well. Thanks! AlexEng( TALK) 02:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ninja (League of Legends player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja (League of Legends player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 11:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Emoey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty ( talk) 16:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.
For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):
Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address.
After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.
The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are Godot13 ( talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs), and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email).
Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Smashing...Live! cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 07:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect China (region). Since you had some involvement with the China (region) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 01:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Flusha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
21:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Teemo lantern.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 00:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flusha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flusha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
The article KRiMZ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
16:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of American writers of the Baby boomer generation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American writers of the Baby boomer generation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 ( talk) 15:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of American Baby Boomers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of American Baby Boomers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe ( talk) 15:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi you created a redirect from NORTH to FC Copenhagen which itself is a redirect page to F.C. Copenhagen but I could find nothing in the article that explains the connection between NORTH and this football club. Could you enlighten me? -- Domdeparis ( talk) 09:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Prisencolin, as an inclusionist, I oppose deletion of articles on the grounds of "non-notability". Wikipedia has unlimited shelfspace and if you are not interested in an article, you won't find it. As far as ships in particular are concerned, Wikiproject Ships has taken the stance that it welcomes ALL articles about ships ( scope). It does not impose a notability threshold. Regards, Acad Ronin ( talk) 20:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but why? Are you familiar with the notability guidelines for athletes? Drmies ( talk) 01:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Prisencolin, based on your RM proposals at Talk:Nice and Talk:Friendly, you have demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding about how articles are titled on WP and I request you stop making RM proposals until your understanding is greatly improved. If you have any questions, please let me know, or inquire at WT:AT. -- В²C ☎ 00:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The article List of dialects with official or recognized status has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
Uanfala (talk)
13:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Nice guy into
Kindness. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
23:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Greetings @ Prisencolin:, I'm Exemplo347. Can I ask why you've declined the PROD for Molecular Significance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Antibiotic Resistance Profiles? The article is clearly an Essay - meaning my PROD reason WP:NOTESSAY is valid. So why did you decline it? Exemplo347 ( talk) 12:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)